Midterms
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
SCOTUS decision is huge for the midterms Republicans do what they should with it.
Are you wondering why the entire Left Wing of America is melting down over this Supreme Court decision right now?
Constitutional
lawyer here — Allow me.
Today, SCOTUS dropped a 6-3 reality check in Louisiana v. Callais that has the usual race-hustler brigade frothing at the mouth. Justice Alito’s majority opinion just ruled that Louisiana’s congressional map — with its extra majority-Black district snaking across the state like Michelle Obama on Cialis — was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Why? Because Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act didn’t require the state to play racial bean-counter and subordinate every traditional districting principle (compactness, communities of interest, you know, actual geography) to skin color. No compelling interest under strict scrutiny = GAME OVER. Boom. Equal Protection Clause wins again.
This isn’t “gutting” the VRA, you professional outrage farmers. It’s interpreting it correctly for the first time in decades. Alito laid it out crystal clear: The VRA is a SHIELD
against actual discrimination, not a sword
for engineering racial spoils systems or proportional representation by melanin quota.
You see, Louisiana’s map prioritized race above everything else without the required justification. That’s textbook reverse discrimination — treating non-Black voters as second-class citizens whose votes get diluted so Democrats can lock in “safe seats.” The 14th Amendment doesn’t do “equity” carve-outs; it demands equal protection for everyone. No more “but it’s for the minorities!” loopholes that just flip the racism script.
And yet, here come the usual suspects — the Congressional Black Caucus, their media megaphone, and every blue-check race baiter on X — screaming that this “dismantles Black voting power,” “revives Jim Crow,” and “ends democracy.”
Spare us the crocodile tears. These are the same folks who cheered on the race-based admissions, hiring quotas, and DEI hiring that screwed over Asians and whites… but suddenly “racism” is back on the menu when the Court says voters aren’t interchangeable racial pawns. Hypocrites. Your entire grift depends on keeping Americans sorted into victim blocs so you can harvest votes and donor cash.
NEWSFLASH: Treating people as individuals instead of skin-color commodities isn’t “suppressing” anyone — it’s the literal definition of civil rights.
This opinion is chef’s kiss well-reasoned constitutionalism. It flows straight from Shaw v. Reno-era precedents and the Framers’ vision: Race is the most suspect classification, not a magic wand for map-drawers. The VRA was born to crush poll taxes and literacy tests that kept Black Americans from the ballot box. It was never meant to mandate racial gerrymandering as a permanent feature of American elections. SCOTUS just slammed the door on that perversion, forcing states to draw maps based on people, not pigmentation. Result? More competitive districts, less racial polarization, and an actual shot at post-racial politics. The left can’t handle it because their power model collapses without the division.
Fun fact for the woke warriors clutching their pearls in the replies: The Constitution is colorblind by design. It doesn’t care about your feelings, your “disparate impact” spreadsheets, or your need for perpetual victim status to stay relevant. Real equality means one set of rules for all — no reverse-racism exceptions, no matter how loudly you cry “systemic!”
Cry harder, identity-politics vampires. The adults in the robe just reminded everyone why we have a Constitution: to protect US from YOU.🫵
America moves forward when we judge ballots by content of character, not color of district. Deal with it.
Are you wondering why the entire Left Wing of America is melting down over this Supreme Court decision right now?
Constitutional
lawyer here — Allow me.Today, SCOTUS dropped a 6-3 reality check in Louisiana v. Callais that has the usual race-hustler brigade frothing at the mouth. Justice Alito’s majority opinion just ruled that Louisiana’s congressional map — with its extra majority-Black district snaking across the state like Michelle Obama on Cialis — was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Why? Because Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act didn’t require the state to play racial bean-counter and subordinate every traditional districting principle (compactness, communities of interest, you know, actual geography) to skin color. No compelling interest under strict scrutiny = GAME OVER. Boom. Equal Protection Clause wins again.
This isn’t “gutting” the VRA, you professional outrage farmers. It’s interpreting it correctly for the first time in decades. Alito laid it out crystal clear: The VRA is a SHIELD
against actual discrimination, not a swordfor engineering racial spoils systems or proportional representation by melanin quota.You see, Louisiana’s map prioritized race above everything else without the required justification. That’s textbook reverse discrimination — treating non-Black voters as second-class citizens whose votes get diluted so Democrats can lock in “safe seats.” The 14th Amendment doesn’t do “equity” carve-outs; it demands equal protection for everyone. No more “but it’s for the minorities!” loopholes that just flip the racism script.
And yet, here come the usual suspects — the Congressional Black Caucus, their media megaphone, and every blue-check race baiter on X — screaming that this “dismantles Black voting power,” “revives Jim Crow,” and “ends democracy.”
Spare us the crocodile tears. These are the same folks who cheered on the race-based admissions, hiring quotas, and DEI hiring that screwed over Asians and whites… but suddenly “racism” is back on the menu when the Court says voters aren’t interchangeable racial pawns. Hypocrites. Your entire grift depends on keeping Americans sorted into victim blocs so you can harvest votes and donor cash.
NEWSFLASH: Treating people as individuals instead of skin-color commodities isn’t “suppressing” anyone — it’s the literal definition of civil rights.
This opinion is chef’s kiss well-reasoned constitutionalism. It flows straight from Shaw v. Reno-era precedents and the Framers’ vision: Race is the most suspect classification, not a magic wand for map-drawers. The VRA was born to crush poll taxes and literacy tests that kept Black Americans from the ballot box. It was never meant to mandate racial gerrymandering as a permanent feature of American elections. SCOTUS just slammed the door on that perversion, forcing states to draw maps based on people, not pigmentation. Result? More competitive districts, less racial polarization, and an actual shot at post-racial politics. The left can’t handle it because their power model collapses without the division.
Fun fact for the woke warriors clutching their pearls in the replies: The Constitution is colorblind by design. It doesn’t care about your feelings, your “disparate impact” spreadsheets, or your need for perpetual victim status to stay relevant. Real equality means one set of rules for all — no reverse-racism exceptions, no matter how loudly you cry “systemic!”
Cry harder, identity-politics vampires. The adults in the robe just reminded everyone why we have a Constitution: to protect US from YOU.🫵
America moves forward when we judge ballots by content of character, not color of district. Deal with it.
The midterms were just decided??? Very possibly yes.
NOBODY IS TELLING YOU THE REAL STORY OF THE SCOTUS VOTING RIGHTS RULING
Yes, the Court ruled 6-3.
Yes, race-based districting is now unconstitutional.
Yes, Louisiana's map got thrown out.
But here's the part everyone is missing:
Democrats don't have a House majority without those court-ordered maps.
→ A dozen of their current seats sit in districts that only exist because federal courts FORCED states to draw them
→ Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina — every one has at least one Democrat seat in a court-created black-majority district
→ Their House margin is FOUR seats
→ SCOTUS just made 12 of their 213 seats legally redrawable
→ Republican-led legislatures don't need new voters — they need a redistricting committee and a Tuesday afternoon
If race-based districts are unconstitutional, then Louisiana redraws.
If Louisiana redraws, then Alabama redraws.
If Alabama redraws, then every Southern state redraws.
If every Southern state redraws, the Democrat House majority was a 60-year courtroom artifact — not an election result.
That's what nobody is saying out loud.
The 2026 midterms were just decided 6-3 — six months before Election Day.
if you're not following me you're finding out about this 48 hours late from someone who read my post..
NOBODY IS TELLING YOU THE REAL STORY OF THE SCOTUS VOTING RIGHTS RULING
Yes, the Court ruled 6-3.
Yes, race-based districting is now unconstitutional.
Yes, Louisiana's map got thrown out.
But here's the part everyone is missing:
Democrats don't have a House majority without those court-ordered maps.
→ A dozen of their current seats sit in districts that only exist because federal courts FORCED states to draw them
→ Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina — every one has at least one Democrat seat in a court-created black-majority district
→ Their House margin is FOUR seats
→ SCOTUS just made 12 of their 213 seats legally redrawable
→ Republican-led legislatures don't need new voters — they need a redistricting committee and a Tuesday afternoon
If race-based districts are unconstitutional, then Louisiana redraws.
If Louisiana redraws, then Alabama redraws.
If Alabama redraws, then every Southern state redraws.
If every Southern state redraws, the Democrat House majority was a 60-year courtroom artifact — not an election result.
That's what nobody is saying out loud.
The 2026 midterms were just decided 6-3 — six months before Election Day.
if you're not following me you're finding out about this 48 hours late from someone who read my post..
This message and similar from Talarico and others should be the messaging from Dems.
Distance from the culture wars stuff, calm and clear messaging without insults and meaness.
I've been hopping around listening to different podcasts when I'm at the gym and even though the podcasts aren't about him, they all detour and rave about his messaging and how presidential he sounds.
While I'm sure that sen ossoff is a wonderful human being, I'd dig a little deeper into the facts of his work in passing/sponsoring legislation that allowed the government to negotiate Medicare prescription drug prices. He may have played a role, as all Democrat senators/representatives did, but this was just one part of the broader IRA in 2022.
Not implying that the whole thing didn't happen just as described, but one senator - Townsend - doesn't get to vote in a provision and another doesn't just get to vote it out.
I also thought it was slick how we went from citizens not being able to afford bread, groceries, rent, gas to a provision in a much larger bill that affects none of the young people pictured in the ad.
This is a campaign ad...maybe someone should ask him why, if he's a member of the corrupt organization, 47 of whose members are in his party, he doesn't take steps to end the corruption. And, if as he might have you to believe, one person can end the restriction on Medicare drugs, the same person can't do something to end the corruption.
And finally, what is he doing to lower the prices of bread. groceries, gas and rent?
All valid comments and suggestions. I am sure that you held members of the Republican party to the same standards with their campaign pledges as well.
Yes Ned, it's a campaign ad that doesn't obligate me to sort through his five-year legislative history to see if I can find flaws but he's spent his entire career fighting corruption, including before he became a Senator. > Ossoff History
But I'm going to be upfront and tell you that I'm very biased as I met him in person at a private fundraiser a few weeks ago and I think he's an outstanding person and politician. Keep your eye on him because there's been a tremendous amount of buzz about his presidential chances if he decides to run.
Here's his own 5 year legislative report
Five-Year Report – U.S. Senator for Georgia Jon Ossoff
www.ossoff.senate.gov
He's been calling out corruption regularly and has stated in one of his stump speeches that if the SEC doesn't investigate the market manipulation that's been going on, then the new Congress will.
Yes Ned, it's a campaign ad that doesn't obligate me to sort through his five-year legislative history to see if I can find flaws but he's spent his entire career fighting corruption, including before he became a Senator. > Ossoff History
But I'm going to be upfront and tell you that I'm very biased as I met him in person at a private fundraiser a few weeks ago and I think he's an outstanding person and politician. Keep your eye on him because there's been a tremendous amount of buzz about his presidential chances if he decides to run.
Here's his own 5 year legislative report
Five-Year Report – U.S. Senator for Georgia Jon Ossoff
He's been calling out corruption regularly and has stated in one of his stump speeches that if the SEC doesn't investigate the market manipulation that's been going on, then the new Congress will.
I imagine you may be right, that he's a great candidate. For myself, I'd like to see the next presidential candidates get away from J6, the 2020 election, the corruption of the trump family, transgenderism, gays and all those things which right now, IMO, are just distractions from the real issues. So, we all know that people are struggling...what is the candidate going to do to ease that struggle? Don't just tell me "I'm going to lower food prices on day 1"...great, can't wait! Now how exactly are you going to do that? Same with healthcare, same with immigration. Prosecuting trump, Biden, Comey and anybody else isn't going to solve the American's problems
All valid comments and suggestions. I am sure that you held members of the Republican party to the same standards with their campaign pledges as well.
Also, the trans,gays etc isn't coming from the left, that's RW talking points to create fear and division. The Left is defending rights that are trying to be taken away.
Trump corruptly does a lot of things at the same time that don't solve American's problems but they do make him filthy rich. The next president cannot turn a blind eye to the mountain of corruption happening right under everyone's noses while republicans look the other way, because we can't allow it to become precedent. If a democrat wins the presidency, that will be the DOJ's job, not the president's, so he will have plenty of time to address all the other issues. .
we can only hope. I have great confidence that the Democrat elected president in 2028 is going to solve all the problems that we are complaining about today. No rationalizations, no what about Trump's..I can't wait for my grocery prices to get back to pre pandemic levels, my healthcare costs to decrease, mortgage rates back to under 4% yielding a housing boom, with housing available for all, no crime, immigration totally under control, gas prices back to under $3/ gal.
it's going to be semi utopia.