Matt Jones Periscope

WonderBraa

All-Conference
Feb 19, 2012
4,317
1,247
0
I don't think scoring was our problem in the UCLA game. We put up something in the 80's. Our defense sucked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: icrase

WildMoon

Heisman
Apr 7, 2009
78,693
11,120
0
Most of you don't get it.

It's not about whether you are or aren't playing good defense it's whether you have or not and see if players who have shown to see if they can play through the difficulties.

Milder didn't play because he isn't good at defense AND it was opportunity for our key guys to figure it out. Well we didn't.

Only loser and panicky coaching would randomly swap players around like an idiot. Mulder wil need to slowly earn it through the season.
 

yoshukai

Heisman
Dec 21, 2002
29,935
42,499
102
I love great shooters. There I said it. We've had our share.

Ask UCLA what they think of shooters.

I think we have 2-3 on this team in Monk, Willis and Mulder. (Of course, you actually have to play to be a shooter so maybe we have 2.) The key is getting the ball to those guys in the right situation to shoot it. And make sure guys like Willis actually shoot the ball instead of picking their nose or passing up shots.

I know Cal is all about defense. I get it and having a great defense can cause harm. But you still have to have those really good shooters to win it all, IMO. We have them. Just have to get them going, IMO.
I'm going to wash my mouth out after saying this but here goes .....The most successful active coach right now recruits shooters AND plays them . Even when they are somewhat lacking on defense . I hate the SOB but that's a fact .
 

MegaBlue05

Heisman
Mar 8, 2014
11,061
22,415
66
Can't rebound , need shooters
Don't box out , put a shooter in
Slow of foot , recruit more shooters
Whatever goes here , shooters we need more
So pretty much shooter under any circumstance , draw your own conclusions on what that says

I'm glad I'm not the only one who understands there's a lot more to successful team basketball than spot-up 3-point shooting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: icrase and Xception

mustnotsleepnow

All-Conference
May 18, 2011
1,921
1,322
0
You think Cal is playing NBA prospects over good players, yet he played Hawkins and Humphries over SKJ?

Some of you are too transparent.

If you can't tell that John Calipari is maniacal about winning, and a complete psychopath of a competitor, then you're willfully ignorant. He says the things he says to get the best players, and he lets those elite players grow because he's trying to win a national title.

The stuff he says is lip service. You can't take 10 McD's AA's and tell them to sacrifice for each other's dreams (read: build loaded teams capable of title runs) and then not have their backs or sacrifice for them. It's why he fell on the sword for Skal. It's why he protected Ryan Harrow. It's why he punishes in house.

But taking his words, twisting them, and then trying to use them literally with stuff like "NBA draft picks are more important than titles," shows you have the critical thinking skills of a middle schooler, at best. They're means to and end, and anyone who hasn't caught on to that yet clearly doesn't want to understand because it doesn't fit their argument.

Can't like this post enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clive Gollings

treyforuk

All-Conference
May 21, 2002
8,250
2,912
0
The same group of posters who had watched enough of Stoops and wanted to buy him out and get another coach now want us to believe that Cal doesn't play some of his team because they aren't going to get drafted .
Take this to.the fb board. Ur being silly with this. Crap
 

Clive Gollings

All-Conference
Nov 10, 2014
6,004
4,725
0
You think Cal is playing NBA prospects over good players, yet he played Hawkins and Humphries over SKJ?

Some of you are too transparent.

If you can't tell that John Calipari is maniacal about winning, and a complete psychopath of a competitor, then you're willfully ignorant. He says the things he says to get the best players, and he lets those elite players grow because he's trying to win a national title.

The stuff he says is lip service. You can't take 10 McD's AA's and tell them to sacrifice for each other's dreams (read: build loaded teams capable of title runs) and then not have their backs or sacrifice for them. It's why he fell on the sword for Skal. It's why he protected Ryan Harrow. It's why he punishes in house.

But taking his words, twisting them, and then trying to use them literally with stuff like "NBA draft picks are more important than titles," shows you have the critical thinking skills of a middle schooler, at best. They're means to and end, and anyone who hasn't caught on to that yet clearly doesn't want to understand because it doesn't fit their argument.

This is spot on. Well said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: icrase

yoshukai

Heisman
Dec 21, 2002
29,935
42,499
102
I'm glad I'm not the only one who understands there's a lot more to successful team basketball than spot-up 3-point shooting.
I think everyone understands it , but you have to have it if you want to win a championship . You HAVE to have balance .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Primedfor9
Jan 29, 2003
18,120
12,185
0
cal makes perfect decisions always. Never makes a wrong call. I love cal but some really tend to worship the man as a deity
this isn't about "making a wrong call." it's being said on here that Cal is intentionally putting an inferior lineup on the floor for some nefarious reason, that he prefers getting kids drafted than winning games.

IOW, losing on purpose.

Which, if true, is treasonous and grounds for immediate execution. And, if not true, is an idiotic allegation.

Hint: it's not true.
 
Apr 1, 2013
16,636
16,620
0
this isn't about "making a wrong call." it's being said on here that Cal is intentionally putting an inferior lineup on the floor for some nefarious reason, that he prefers getting kids drafted than winning games.

IOW, losing on purpose.

Which, if true, is treasonous and grounds for immediate execution. And, if not true, is an idiotic allegation.

Hint: it's not true.
To be fair, Cal did say it's more important to him to put players in the NBA than winning NCAA titles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ashleys handfull

wildcatdon

Heisman
Oct 17, 2012
10,498
13,405
113
this isn't about "making a wrong call." it's being said on here that Cal is intentionally putting an inferior lineup on the floor for some nefarious reason, that he prefers getting kids drafted than winning games.

IOW, losing on purpose.

Which, if true, is treasonous and grounds for immediate execution. And, if not true, is an idiotic allegation.

Hint: it's not true.
That is not what anyone is saying..think about what you said for a minute. If he was putting an inferior lineup on the floor, none of the 4 and 5 star kids that start would be in it. It would be Pullion and that other walk-on kid if anyone inferior was playing. Cal has stated he wants to get kids drafted and that is his first priority. No one said he is losing on purpose..But many are saying guys like Mulder should get a chance because he has proved himself to be a valuable contributor this season. Cal needs to give him a chance with the first group. Maybe sub Briscoe out and put Mulder in and then put Briscoe back in to relieve Fox later on. Mulder can shoot and is athletic enough to do other things offensively. He guards better than Willis or Gabriel..In the game the other day we could have used his scoring because no one was guarding anyone in either team. We just don't shoot that well at this time. You Cal worshipers just read and interpret things the way you want to apparently but no one else is saying they hate Cal or anything of the sort. But there are a few of us that disagree with his methods sometime and there is nothing wrong with that. This board is for discussion isn't it?
 

Primedfor9

Senior
Oct 1, 2015
1,094
601
0
I'm constantly amazed that we have so many people here that think theres some conspiracy here with Mulder or that Cal is the only person alive that doesn't know he has this hidden Larry Bird caliber player waisting away on his bench.
Mulder was a 4 star player with a grade of 90 coming out of the juco ranks..that's equivalent to a top 30 guy coming out of high school..so while he may not be bird, his ranking suggests that big things was expected of Mulder from scouts.
 

KMKAT

All-Conference
Sep 17, 2003
94,731
2,957
50
Never saw the tweet from the 38-1 team, but a Harrison comes to mind. I guess Matt doesn't want to address it and stir things up.
Anyway, we got killed at the 4, as we had zero answer for Leaf and Welsh. I was totally surprised by our deficiency there, but we'll learn and we better not look like this come March.
Lots of great points here, and its never one area. The only complaint I have was 3 Briscoe miscues and I don't believe he lost any time on the court for it. But the fact is, others have a much shorter rope to get minutes, namely, Humphries and Mulder have little room for error.

I'm still all in, and while I want another shot at UCLA, that will be very unlikely come tourney time.

Now let's go get UNC and UL and smack them around!
 

Rhavic

Heisman
Dec 15, 2014
33,418
23,865
68
To be fair, Cal did say it's more important to him to put players in the NBA than winning NCAA titles.

No, he said he would be disappointed if he won a title and nobody was drafted, which is vastly different from what you're saying.
He said he very clearly wants to win titles.

You make it sound as if he's content with losing, and in his press conference just yesterday, he made it abundantly clear that losing disgusts him.
 
Apr 1, 2013
16,636
16,620
0
No, he said he would be disappointed if he won a title and nobody was drafted, which is vastly different from what you're saying.
He said he very clearly wants to win titles.

You make it sound as if he's content with losing, and in his press conference just yesterday, he made it abundantly clear that losing disgusts him.

"Last year we started the season with a goal. You may think that goal was to win the national title and win all the games. It was to get eight players drafted ..."

That's a direct quote after the 38-1 season. I don't doubt he hates losing but a lot of you refuse to believe that it's not his primary objective to win. I'm sure he won't deny that he's players first.
 

Dirk2Bowie

Senior
Mar 2, 2008
993
821
58
To be fair, Cal did say it's more important to him to put players in the NBA than winning NCAA titles.
He has also followed that up with the explanation that if those guys are good enough to make the NBA then they will "drag us along" to championships. I think he's onto something. It's just an incredibly difficult task.