Matt Bevin on Jurich

katwest

Heisman
Feb 16, 2003
39,983
13,992
113
Bevin has the people second guessing him now, saying such a thing, Jurich is rotten to the core and his tolerance of wrong doing in the program and lack of morals as a leader has caused all of this. One term governor is going to be the result of his backing jurich.
 
  • Like
Reactions: skullnbonesdiss

BlueRattie_rivals

All-Conference
Feb 6, 2014
1,052
1,943
0
Sounds like standard political drivel to me. What's he supposed to say on the Louisville show? "Yea, TJ screwed the university up and I hope he goes down in flames"?

We all think TJ is dirty as can be. I'd bet money he is. But to this point he isn't accused of anything other than manning a dirty ship. The Governer can't go on public radio and say things to the contrary.

And your first sentence proved the point I was making. The word "Bevin" had your mind made up on this before you read another word. Also, I never inferred Bevin was the one with common sense.

Bingo.

Reading most responses on this thread, I get the feeling that unless the governor says exactly what they would say in the same position then he's "an idiot". Of course the fact that Bevin measured his words carefully is one reason why he's in a position of power whereas people who speak without considering who they are speaking to are not in power.
 

ZenCatFan73

All-Conference
Dec 19, 2015
3,879
4,626
0
Sounds like standard political drivel to me. What's he supposed to say on the Louisville show? "Yea, TJ screwed the university up and I hope he goes down in flames"?

We all think TJ is dirty as can be. I'd bet money he is. But to this point he isn't accused of anything other than manning a dirty ship. The Governer can't go on public radio and say things to the contrary.

And your first sentence proved the point I was making. The word "Bevin" had your mind made up on this before you read another word. Also, I never inferred Bevin was the one with common sense.

Please. How bout maintaining a sense of neutrality? I don't feel like he did. Second, you are correct, I don't like Bevin. I disagree with his position on a number of issues. By saying he likes Jurich, (and he did say that), he his going to be criticized.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf

BlueRattie_rivals

All-Conference
Feb 6, 2014
1,052
1,943
0
Fair enough; however, it does sound like he is trying to appeal to his constituents. With respect, your post reads like you're a republican (which is fine), despite your claim that you aren't. It certainly seems biased.

I'm not a member of the GOP. I am, however, a member of a minority party. I don't think he's appealing to constituents as much as he is playing in safe in front of an audience that is already against him (the city of Louisville).
 
  • Like
Reactions: sefus12

Big John Stud

All-American
Jan 14, 2003
23,281
8,876
0
Bevin lost Jefferson County by 38,000 votes. For a republican, that's not "loosing badly". In fact, it's the best any republican (I, myself, am not a republican) has done there in decades, even better than Fletcher, who won the governorship. Remember, the vast majority of the state is rural or semi-rural. Those counties will go red and go red big. Bevin doesn't have to win Lexington and Louisville, he just needs to stay within 50,000 votes or so and he'll be fine. Of course, Bevin doesn't win anything if not for the utter failure of Obama to hold his party together. The former president may have racked up his own electoral victories, but his policies were the death knell to democrat governors and legislators across the country.

Per Clare Malone @ 538.com: "At the beginning of Obama’s term, Democrats controlled 59 percent of state legislatures, while now they control only 31 percent, the lowest percentage for the party since the turn of the 20th century. They held 29 governor’s offices and now have only 16, the party’s lowest number since 1920." Obama's personal appeal was good for him, but he fractured his constituency, most notably, rural blue-collar workers. In the wake of this new electoral map, Kentucky went from purple to blood red very quickly. When I look at the county map of Kentucky (outside of Jefferson and Fayette counties), I see an ocean of people who either love Trumpism, hate democrats, or both. Unless the Dem's run a classic Dixiecrat, someone who can reforge ties to rural voters, I don't see how they can win.

It's still a bogus excuse for a governor supporting a corrupt athletics director. He lost Jefferson County close to 60-40 and it would have been worse if Jack Conway and family didn't try to railroad Hezzie Boone. A very small percentage of the state supports corrupt Tom Jurich.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZenCatFan73

awf

Heisman
May 31, 2006
10,411
20,774
0
This. Let's not forget that paper companies paid politicians to make hemp, and by association, marijuana illegal so that paper would have a monopoly in the market (hemp is like paper but better).

In addition, with all the greed and bribery at U of L it's not a far reach to suggest that TJ could be paying Bevin to support him.

Not saying this is happening (I have no evidence other than historical corruption from the US government and people with money) but we can't rule it out either.

How much is a multi million dollar a year job worth?