Male Contempt
- Thread starter Nittering Nabob
- Start date
Not to worry Harry,
The Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 is declaring open war on women and will strip those intruding, meddling, troublemaking females from their constitutional rights that encompass voting, equal protection under law, and freedom from sex-based discrimination in employment, education, and other areas and have those felines off the streets and back in the home where they belong.
they probably will shortly ...........I am so happy this thread survived.. Thought the mods would take it down.
The OP's original source article is not a factual source. It's full of misinformation. Never should have been put in a thread.Not to worry Harry,
The Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 is declaring open war on women and will strip those intruding, meddling, troublemaking females from their constitutional rights that encompass voting, equal protection under law, and freedom from sex-based discrimination in employment, education, and other areas and have those felines off the streets and back in the home where they belong.
Last edited:
There is something that only women own and a lot of men would like to get...
yeah but that was after they dragged them back to their cave by their hair.
Yeah at least when they are at home they can make me a sandwich.Not to worry Harry,
The Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 is declaring open war on women and will strip those intruding, meddling, troublemaking females from their constitutional rights that encompass voting, equal protection under law, and freedom from sex-based discrimination in employment, education, and other areas and have those felines off the streets and back in the home where they belong.
Oh, the good old days circa the 1960s. Happy domesticated women were over-medicated on uppers so they could cook, clean, shop, take care of the kids, etc. Meanwhile hubby came home from work, put his feet up, had a few beers, and watched television. OTOH, women who rebelled against a domestic life were diagnosed with behavioral problems and prescribed tranquilizers. So then women on both ends of the spectrum were popping pills. One to keep them hyper, the other to mellow them out. Even the Rolling Stones recorded a song (Mother's Little Helper) about the trend of women popping pills. I'm glad we've evolved since then. Or have we??
I believe a joke from around that era was something like.... How can you tell a hippie chick from a suburban housewife?? The hippie chick gets her drugs from a street corner while the housewife gets hers from a pharmacist.
I didn’t raise my daughter to put up with men who think and say the things I see being written on here. Sorry/not sorry. Perhaps you should Blame the good fathers of the world for your troubles navigating modern women.
So says the modern version of shrunken gonads Willie Loman.
I don’t think you have the courage to share your academic and professional credentials with this board so that we can rightfully compare them with the author of the article.
She is allegedly an internationally famous sexual relations professional.
Figuratively speaking, can you hold a candle to her?
Last edited:
And the stalker doxer just can’t help himself…..So says the modern version of shrunken gonads Willie Loman.
I don’t think you have the courage to share your academic and professional credentials with this board so that we can rightfully compare them with the author of the article.
She is allegedly an internationally famous sexual relations professional.
Figuratively speaking, can you hold a candle to her?
Because someone is famous doesn’t mean they are right. She makes huge leaps all over this article. It’s trash and an attempt to pacify insecure men.So says the modern version of shrunken gonads Willie Loman.
I don’t think you have the courage to share your academic and professional credentials with this board so that we can rightfully compare them with the author of the article.
She is allegedly an internationally famous sexual relations professional.
Figuratively speaking, can you hold a candle to her?
Oh so now you are evaluating my courage and my credentials. How wonderful of you. My opinion is flawed because I don’t have the right degree? If that’s the case 99% of peoples opinions on this board don’t count. Just because someone is famous doesn’t make them right.So says the modern version of shrunken gonads Willie Loman.
I don’t think you have the courage to share your academic and professional credentials with this board so that we can rightfully compare them with the author of the article.
She is allegedly an internationally famous sexual relations professional.
Figuratively speaking, can you hold a candle to her?
The idea that men are being exploited is hilarious. How about men make better choices with their jobs, partners, money etc and quit feeling sorry for themselves.
Justices Roberts, Thomas and Alito - Hold Our Beers!
Justice Kavanaugh - Uhhh.....I already drank my beer.
Last edited:
You ever go down the rabbit hole on Parkinson's law?
Parkinson's conjecture that membership exceeding a number "between 19.9 and 22.4" makes a committee manifestly inefficient seems well justified by the evidence proposed. Less certain is the optimal number of members, which must lie between three (a logical minimum) and 20. (Within a group of 20, factions or various individual discussions may occur, some of which may substitute for or displace the working of the whole committee, thus diluting the power of the leader, the chair of the committee proper.
And then remember, our own BOT has 38 members. Laugh, or cry?
