Make Arlington Great Again

Oct 29, 2003
408
721
93
Curious to get peoples thoughts on Bears bid on the racetrack. I would be all for it-attract NCAA tourney, host SB, roof for cold weather, etc. Only issue would be traffic.....but I am sure IDOT would figure something out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kkhawk

sporthog_9er

All-Conference
Jun 9, 2001
1,333
1,183
113
I have 2008-Chicago bids for Olympics- type of nightmares brewing already with this. Traffic, infrastructure, taxes, public for/against back and forth. Not sure if I'm excited or not. Something kind of nice of going to Soldier on the lake. Wish they could just add a roof there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lookoutforliam

ClownBaby

Heisman
Oct 26, 2006
23,491
80,217
113
I have 2008-Chicago bids for Olympics- type of nightmares brewing already with this. Traffic, infrastructure, taxes, public for/against back and forth. Not sure if I'm excited or not. Something kind of nice of going to Soldier on the lake. Wish they could just add a roof there.
Soldier Field is a dump easily the worst NFL stadium I’ve been to.
 

greatgig13

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2014
2,369
2,754
0
I see nothing but traffic jams on 53. I know we have Metra but ideally you’d want the CTA nearby too. Maybe Elon’s Hyper Loop will be ready by then.
 

greatgig13

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2014
2,369
2,754
0
Traffic is a non-issue to me, and I say this as a guy who hates being in a car. You’re talking about possibly 80,000 people in one area. There’s going to be traffic.
And traffic is why I stay away from SF. That on top of it being a crappy venue.
 

LTHSALUM76

All-Conference
Aug 27, 2014
2,509
1,955
0
I am Ok with a stadium going up out there as long as the infrastructure will handle it. But NO ROOF, NO ROOF, NO EFFING ROOF you softies!! Baseball and football are meant to be played outside in the elements. If you want some basketball tournament build another stadium somewhere else.

The minute they put a roof on the place the Bears lose any edge cold weather gives. And don't start that Super Bowl crap. More of them are still played in warm weather cities anyway and we won't see New York get another.
 

SOUTHSIDECFD

Senior
Oct 1, 2009
1,876
767
0
I am Ok with a stadium going up out there as long as the infrastructure will handle it. But NO ROOF, NO ROOF, NO EFFING ROOF you softies!! Baseball and football are meant to be played outside in the elements. If you want some basketball tournament build another stadium somewhere else.

The minute they put a roof on the place the Bears lose any edge cold weather gives. And don't start that Super Bowl crap. More of them are still played in warm weather cities anyway and we won't see New York get another.
NO ROOF, but they need to consider the latest version of field turf.
 

ClownBaby

Heisman
Oct 26, 2006
23,491
80,217
113
I am Ok with a stadium going up out there as long as the infrastructure will handle it. But NO ROOF, NO ROOF, NO EFFING ROOF you softies!! Baseball and football are meant to be played outside in the elements. If you want some basketball tournament build another stadium somewhere else.

The minute they put a roof on the place the Bears lose any edge cold weather gives. And don't start that Super Bowl crap. More of them are still played in warm weather cities anyway and we won't see New York get another.
Since they won the Super Bowl they are 5-8 in home playoff games, so what is the advantage the cold offers? If you are going to put garbage on the field at least give the fans a good experience.
 

colin2229

All-Conference
Jul 23, 2005
2,642
1,852
0
The only reason to move, IMO, is for a better stadium with a better playing surface. Playing surface is a joke. At this point, they need to go field turf with all the play that field gets from HS football and college games. As well as other events.

Don't care about the other reason being talked about around town (hosting big 10 hoops, NCAA tourny, super bowl, etc....) Why does any of that matter other than "it sounds cool".

We have the UC to host Big 10 and tourney games. They have done it before.

Patriots, Packers, Jets, Giants, etc all have similar climates and play outdoors. I personally like football outside as opposed to in a dome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LTHSALUM76

McCaravan

All-American
Feb 1, 2016
4,886
7,657
113
The only reason to move, IMO, is for a better stadium with a better playing surface. Playing surface is a joke. At this point, they need to go field turf with all the play that field gets from HS football and college games. As well as other events.

Don't care about the other reason being talked about around town (hosting big 10 hoops, NCAA tourny, super bowl, etc....) Why does any of that matter other than "it sounds cool".

We have the UC to host Big 10 and tourney games. They have done it before.

Patriots, Packers, Jets, Giants, etc all have similar climates and play outdoors. I personally like football outside as opposed to in a dome.
I was told Solider Field keeps grass so they can have major Soccer events...when does that happen once every 8 years?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SOUTHSIDECFD

Still Missing34

All-Conference
Jul 12, 2005
2,529
2,091
113
"Don't care about the other reason being talked about around town (hosting big 10 hoops, NCAA tourny, super bowl, etc....) Why does any of that matter other than "it sounds cool"."

Like everything else, additional revenue.
 

SOUTHSIDECFD

Senior
Oct 1, 2009
1,876
767
0
The only reason to move, IMO, is for a better stadium with a better playing surface. Playing surface is a joke. At this point, they need to go field turf with all the play that field gets from HS football and college games. As well as other events.

Don't care about the other reason being talked about around town (hosting big 10 hoops, NCAA tourny, super bowl, etc....) Why does any of that matter other than "it sounds cool".

We have the UC to host Big 10 and tourney games. They have done it before.

Patriots, Packers, Jets, Giants, etc all have similar climates and play outdoors. I personally like football outside as opposed to in a dome.
If you remember Chicago hosted several prelim games in the world cup some time ago. The Chicago Park District hired a lot of new kids and interns for that event. Many of those people are now the people running the park district. They have fought installing field turf for years. They would much rather see two Latin American countries play soccer than American football.

The city should have built a new stadium just to the west over the railroad.
 

LTHSALUM76

All-Conference
Aug 27, 2014
2,509
1,955
0
Since they won the Super Bowl they are 5-8 in home playoff games, so what is the advantage the cold offers? If you are going to put garbage on the field at least give the fans a good experience.
I get that and you make a good point. But why even things up on purpose? They might gain an advantage with crowd noise under a dome. So, there's that.
 

USD24

All-American
May 29, 2001
5,526
5,372
113
And traffic is why I stay away from SF. That on top of it being a crappy venue.
Just out of curiosity, do you attend any large events? There is traffic at every major event. Soldier Field traffic isnt as bad as most major college football venues I have been to.
 
Last edited:

greatgig13

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2014
2,369
2,754
0
Just out of curiosity, do you attend any large events? There is traffic at every major event. Soldier Field traffic isnt as bad like most major college football venues I have been to.
Not much anymore. The last time I went to SF it took me 3 hours from Deerfield on a Monday night game. I’m just getting to be a grumpy old man and prefer television.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USD24

Still Missing34

All-Conference
Jul 12, 2005
2,529
2,091
113
Not much anymore. The last time I went to SF it took me 3 hours from Deerfield on a Monday night game. I’m just getting to be a grumpy old man and prefer television.
Getting to and from a Sox game has become increasingly aggravating.
 

Still Missing34

All-Conference
Jul 12, 2005
2,529
2,091
113
How does that increase traffic times heading into a game?

Disregard the above, I realized after re-reading you referring to the added aggravation. Good Times!!!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: USD24

Quags22

Senior
Aug 15, 2006
2,280
918
113
I am Ok with a stadium going up out there as long as the infrastructure will handle it. But NO ROOF, NO ROOF, NO EFFING ROOF you softies!! Baseball and football are meant to be played outside in the elements. If you want some basketball tournament build another stadium somewhere else.

The minute they put a roof on the place the Bears lose any edge cold weather gives. And don't start that Super Bowl crap. More of them are still played in warm weather cities anyway and we won't see New York get another.
Bear weather is a myth

Do you have tickets and go to the games?