Livingston really hurt his draft stock by doing the little things and playing better the last couple months. That gave him more opportunities and his shooting percentages plummeted. There was a time when he was 85+% from the line and about 40% from 3. Albeit on limited attempts. But he finished at 72% from the line and 30% from 3 while averaging 6 and 4 a game.
Now he still could pull the Peyton Watson, wing top 15 player, underwhelm in college, go pro and get drafted plan. Problem for Chris is Watson was long and lanky which the NBA loves. Maybe someone drafts him latter part of day 2 on athleticism and high school pedigree but that’s far from a guarantee.
He’s a 6’6 tweener with limited perimeter skills that showed nothing in the post this past season. Him not being a bona fide player as a top 15 recruit was one of the top factors in our disappointing year.
I think this is very hard for Cal. Do you pencil him in at the 4 for next year? However, you are not getting a top PF transfer if Chris is still here. They will see the pedigree and expect Cal to give them the spot.
Does Chris event want to play the 4? Justin will be the 3 man. Chris contrary to his own opinion can’t play the 2. Chris needs an open transition play style. We ranked 258 in Kenpom in tempo. He’s a downhill transition player at this point in time for a team that didn’t run.
I’ll use a very limited sample of last year, but for next year would you prefer sophomore Livingston or a PF transfer the like of Pete Nance, Matt Mayer, Trevon Brazile, etc? Those are the non plodding post options that were the highest ranked PF transfer options last year and for my question we’ll presume similar level this year.