Liberalism in 2017
- Thread starter wvu2007
- Start date
No Pedo bashing? So grown ups who prey on kids should be "understood" according to these sickos?
Life on the Left. Like like living in a hyberbolic plastic chamber inhaling your own poision under the delusion it's fresh clean air.
How do they defend pedophiles? What does that sign mean?
My God!
How's that reflect my priorities? The point, which you missed, is that folks who are so screwed up that they defend pedos still understand that white supremacists are bad people.I gotta say man, your priorities arekay:.
[eyeroll]
And the people who prey on children for sex are better?
You confirm my suspicion that life on the Left defending them leads to dimentia followed by rheumatoid arthritis of your moral functioning.
Just because I think their analysis of white supremacists is correct doesn't mean I think they are good people. Good Lord, why is that hard to comprehend? A broken clock is right twice a day.
As another example, I bet most white supremacists would say that the sky is blue. That doesn't mean I agree with them on much else.
Logic really isn't your strong suit. The point was simple, but apparently simple people don't get it.
White Supremacists aren't advocating for sex with Children. Still they are as sick as pedophiles but singling them out as somehow more perverse than adults who prefer sex with kids is like nymphos calling hookers whores!
I condem all of them equally and do not consider one form of debauchery and evil any better or less than the other. That's like asking which creep is less creepy? Child molesters or racist segregationists?
Is there really a difference?
No, I understand just fine, you tried to move the conversation from antifa and there pedo sympathies over to the right not denouncing the KKK sufficiently enough for you. I can only assume the point hits a little to close to home for you and you felt the need to deflect.
Can you show me where I said one was better or worse than the other? I simply said that pedos - disgusting people for sure - understood that white supremacists are bad people.
And pedos think white supremacists are worse creeps. Guess they would know?
They hold joint conventions and compare notes on who is more disgusting to the other.
Wait. So if someone protests with people who are bad people, NAMBLA with Antifa in your example, then they all fall into the same category? Is that the stance you took in Charlotte when 1 from the alt right committed an act of terror? I'm pretty certain it isn't.
My God mule_eer what kind of twisted logic are you trying to argue here?
Let me try and simplify it for you.
Pedophiles and white supremacists are sick evil people who prey on innocent Children and hate people because of their skin color. Their sickness is exceeded only by their depravity and absence of any moral conscience that justifies their evil. One is no better or worse than the other and all of them are hopeless Sinners in need of repentance.
I know you can't say that but I just did with ease and isn't that the point?
What is so hard to comprehend? One group of disgusting humans can think another group of disgusting humans is bad. I'm not endorsing either group or ranking them on relative scales of evil.
It was a joke, poking fun of the good people on both sides of the Charlotte situation. I thought it was self explanatory.
Why do you try to have logical discussion with liberals. They cannot understand what you are saying, the portion of their brain for reasoning things out is dead.
It seems you are doing that. Care to answer the question, like I don't already know the answer to that.
I've already explained what happened in C-ville, multiple times over many weeks. I'm not rehashing it for you in a thread about PEDOs you pedo enabling jackass.
Where is my comment that ranks them on relative levels of evilness? Quote it. I've already said exactly what you are saying in the quote above, so I can't see how you are missing this, unless you're just trolling. I alrwady know that Bill's game.
You don't want to rehash the indefensible. You're trolling, and I took the bait with a joke. Now when you get called out, you dodge the question.
I don't understand the politics of hate. It goes no where. I find it sort of strange that someone who wants to live in a Christian theocracy would tout the politics of hate. It seems contradictory to me.
I read you essentially arguing mule_eer that one sick group recognizes the other sick group's sickness is not as bad as the one they are pointing out.
It's a ridiculous argument. Sick depraved people can't point out other sick depraved people no matter how much more sick or depraved they believe the other sick and depraved folks to be!
Child molesters calling out racists is like Roaches dissing Rats for being filthy.
You don't see that? Is there some moral superiority to child molesters that allows them to call out racists as being more depraved than they are?
Really?
I don't tout the politics of hate. I tout the politics of separation. You hedonistic, Satan worshipping Marxists can do whatever you want in your own country. But if you guys want to force me to live in the same country as you I'm going to work to crush your ideology until it's dead, dead, dead.
That would be a ridiculous argument, and I've explained that it wasn't my argument. I'm not going to rehash it a thousand times over. I'm sure the pedos are disgusted by the racists, and the racists are distgusted by the pedos. That doesn't make either better or worse than the other. They are both equally evil in my eyes.
The issue here to me brushy is calling ALL of it out as miserable sin.
One cannot excuse or compare either as more or less. It is all equally Evil and all equally bad. I'm surprised it's even arguable.
No one's forcing you to transform America into another Marxist hellhole either, but here we are. You realize that I'm willing to divide the land amicably and you want it all and if I decide I want to stay it has to be by your rules. GFY
All I'm doing is participating in the democratic process. Sometimes a candidate I vote for wins. Sometimes they lose. I have yet to see the candidate for any office whose political stances match mine exactly.
And all through this process, I realize how rare it is in human history where a nation of people have had the opportunity to live freely and participate voluntarily in their government like this. While I see things that I believe should change or things that could be done more efficiently, I have the right to voice those opinions in public or to my representatives without fear of oppression from my government. If I don't like the outcomes I'm getting from those actions, I can run for office to try to effect those changes, regardless whether my parents were dirt farmers or captains of industry.
You have those same rights. Hopefully you are exercising them. I fail to see how splitting up a nation like this helps. The last attempt at that failed miserably.
That's how a democracy is supposed to work. It's relatively rare that people who don't come from money in one way or another rise to high office, but plenty of regular people serve in lower offices - city councils, state houses, etc. Some of those folks gain enough political momentum to seek higher offices.
Also, I'm not saying this is a perfect system. It isn't. It takes time for things to go through the process. The process stalls sometimes. You still get to have input. I'll grant that input plus a campaign donation gets you more time with your rep, and that's a problem. It's still better than any other system that I know.
