Let's draft a suitable compensation plan

CalipariCapo

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2018
1,609
2,824
0
*Lengthy but PLEASE read*

Hello fellow wildcat fans! I have been a long time reader of this board for many years (since the fast paste days lmao) and have finally broke down, bit the bullet and created an account. Part of the reason is because there is so much talk these days of compensation for athletes and doing away with "amateurism" at the collegiate level (the other reason is because I love my fellow cats fans and live to talk good, knowledgeable basketball).

I am a recent graduate of a university (to remain nameless). During my time on campus, I had many classes with multiple football, basketball, and baseball players. During these classes, many of the athletes would not attend class. If they did attend class, they often would act very immature and cause disruption in the classroom. Some were lucky to even spell their own names. It would never fail though that these same players would pass the classes and be in the more advanced class the next semester.

I understand that not every student athlete is the same and there are some that do take their education seriously, but the majority of the ones that I have met, seen, and interacted with do not. THIS is the reason why an academic scholarship plus free room,board,meals,etc. are not enough for these players anymore (that do not see a free education as a monetary value). I am under the belief that if universities start paying athletes to play certain sports, our society will prove that Darwinism has completely taken over. That sends the message to the future generations that you don't have to try at school or become more knowledgeable about the world, as long as you have a unique body type that can dribble,throw, or catch, you will have far more advantages than the "normal" student/human being. This will give way to the phasing out of the mid major along with many other unintended consequences that come with putting a plan into action such as education around the country plummeting and being replaced by practicing a sport that will pay to go to college.

I am of the mindset that just because something has been done a certain way for so long, it does not mean that it can not be changed and made better. Saying it can not be changed only closes the door for discussion. I am completely OPPOSED to flat out paying of players/students to play a sport. However, I am not oblivious to the money the NCAA is racking in at these players expense. A great paradox indeed.

As stated previously, I am a recent college graduate and my gf has an accounting degree with an economics masters from the same university. We have been talking about the recent FBI scandal and wanted to come up with a plan that would compensate the players fairly, but also not send the message that just because you're not 6'8", and can't dunk or tackle, you, your interests, and your contribution to this world isn't any less important.

I understand this plan is not perfect and I am not claiming to be a financial wizard. I am looking for discussion as to how this plan could be made better and I know there is no other place better to do achieve that goal then on Rupp Rafters so here it goes:

1. The respective player files for an alternative financial aid agreement before arriving to university
2. The respective player is qualified to receive full or part tuition, room, board, meals, etc. (basically how a scholarship works currently)
3. If the respective player is a full scholarship athlete, the respective player will receive 1% of the profits generated through their respective sport PER YEAR. (Would have to work out what a part scholarship player receives).
4. The amount the student athlete receives would then go into an interest bearing account the student athlete sets up on their behalf (mutual fund, IRA, etc.). The student athlete could also choose to let the athletic program keep the money as a loan. Student will receive a fixed interest rate during the time the school retains the loan.
5. If the student athlete GRADUATES, they will receive the compensation from the athletic department as services to the school while also receiving a free education, meals, clothing, room and board, big man on campus status, etc.
6. If the player leaves college early and signs a contract for athletic services of any kind OR the athlete/family/anyone related to their recruitment is proven to have colluded with sports agents or received any kind of impermissible benefit, they are required to convey the compensation they have received from the athletic department back to the university or to a charity of their choice. TAX BENEFITS included. (If player leaves early and signs a professional contract AND caught colliding with agents/ taking extra benefits, the student athlete is required to pay back the compensation he/she has received PLUS matching that amount as a fine that must be paid back to the school or a charity of their choice).
7. In order for the student athlete or university to be required to partake in this plan, the respective universities athletic department must be generating profits well over the national average (certain percentages would have to be ratified).
8. The respective player may receive a loan from a university/financial institution for "living expenses" but loan must be repaid within a certain time. (Payment plan can be worked out)
9. If the student athlete graduates from the respective university, the student athlete is eligible to receive their compensation ONLY if they have complied with all the previous guidelines AND they have taken at least 6 credit hours of an investment/ financial management course. (Student must maintain at least a 2.5 GPA throughout the entirety of their career).

This is all I have at the moment but I know their are a lot of great minds on this board that can help tweak this out, point out the flaws, or just flat out shred it to pieces lol. I know @irishcat1965 is a lawyer and may be able to add some insight to whether or not something along these lines could be a viable plan. For those of you that read all the way through, I thank you! GO CATS and I feel like we have a real shot to bring home #9 this year as we can guard and score from all 5 positions when we are hot.

P.S. Duke and Carolina can suck a ****
 
Nov 15, 2008
38,645
57,515
0
 

CELTICAT

Heisman
May 21, 2002
19,232
18,803
113
Jesus, two separate “Long time lurker, finally made an account” threads in one night. It’s Rupp’s Raftards, its not that serious.
 

JLK83

Senior
Apr 14, 2005
4,669
479
0
It's not a bad first cut at a plan, but if you give the player 1% they are going to get paid more at some schools than others. That would make it hard to implement.
 

CalipariCapo

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2018
1,609
2,824
0
It's not a bad first cut at a plan, but if you give the player 1% they are going to get paid more at some schools than others. That would make it hard to implement.
I agree, that is true and there would be an outcry that some are getting paid more than others, but at the same time, wouldn't the student athletes at U.K. deserve to make more than Murray State. They bring in more money so therefore they should be compensated justly. That is the way of the world
 
  • Like
Reactions: MbergCat and CGblue

JLK83

Senior
Apr 14, 2005
4,669
479
0
I agree, that is true and there would be an outcry that some are getting paid more than others, but at the same time, wouldn't the student athletes at U.K. deserve to make more than Murray State. They bring in more money so therefore they should be compensated justly. That is the way of the world

They would, but it isn't going to win many votes in the NCAA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CGblue

CalipariCapo

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2018
1,609
2,824
0
They would, but it isn't going to win many votes in the NCAA.
The NCAA is now in a position where their hand has been forced. Something will have to change or else the people behind the recruiting underworld will realize that they are the ones running things (like they already are). The people will see the NCAA as nothing more than a paper tiger with no claws (as we already do) and the paying for players/ extra benefits will get worse and worse in time. Even if this certain plan isn't viable, the NCAA has to do SOMETHING/ANYTHING to prove they still have enforcement in the matter of collegiate athletics. Given the NCAA's history though, I have given up all hope that they will do anything that makes sense to try and rectify this situation.
 

CalipariCapo

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2018
1,609
2,824
0
You're over thinking it. All it needs to be is a kid can make money with his own name, image, and autograph. Vanderbilt can do a Cane's commercial and Knox a radio add for Malones steaks. Easy.
I don't believe this will fix the complaint of how much the players ar bringing in for their respective universities and the NCAA. The compensation the NCAA would allow players to receive under this plan would be pennies on the dollar compared to what they could make through a percentage of the profits generated. I love the discussion though. Let's keep going!
 

JLK83

Senior
Apr 14, 2005
4,669
479
0
The NCAA is now in a position where their hand has been forced.

I wouldn't say that. The NCAA athlete compensation issue is separable from the actions of shoe companies and dirty agents like Andy Miller. More will certainly come out, and the NCAA may end up sanctioning a few schools and coaches, but they'll fight tooth and nail not to share revenue with the players.

For 99% of NCAA athletes room, board and a scholarship is a pretty good deal. For the other one percent, most aren't sticking around for more than a year anyway.
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
The NCAA is now in a position where their hand has been forced. Something will have to change or else the people behind the recruiting underworld will realize that they are the ones running things (like they already are). The people will see the NCAA as nothing more than a paper tiger with no claws (as we already do) and the paying for players/ extra benefits will get worse and worse in time. Even if this certain plan isn't viable, the NCAA has to do SOMETHING/ANYTHING to prove they still have enforcement in the matter of collegiate athletics. Given the NCAA's history though, I have given up all hope that they will do anything that makes sense to try and rectify this situation.
First, why do you think every scholarship player needs to be compensated?
 

CalipariCapo

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2018
1,609
2,824
0
First, why do you think every scholarship player needs to be compensated?
I do not think every scholarship player should be compensated. Only those athletes that are at major universities that bring in multi millions of dollars per year and are in the media every day should be compensated. Under the plan I provided, it provides incentive for the student athlete to stay in school and work towards a degree knowing that they will have money waiting for them when they get out. If the athletic department brings in 1 million per year, the athlete will receive 10,000 per year. That is enough to pay off a loan they take out from the university or financial institution to cover living expenses. That's why there is the stipulation that the athletic department must be making a profit well over the national average in order to implement this plan. Besides, let's be honest, this is only an issue in regards to schools that have major athletic departments and make a crap ton of money ever year because that is where the market for these athletes are.
 

Elliott Tim

All-American
Dec 10, 2005
10,122
6,290
0
*Lengthy but PLEASE read*

Hello fellow wildcat fans! I have been a long time reader of this board for many years (since the fast paste days lmao) and have finally broke down, bit the bullet and created an account. Part of the reason is because there is so much talk these days of compensation for athletes and doing away with "amateurism" at the collegiate level (the other reason is because I love my fellow cats fans and live to talk good, knowledgeable basketball).

I am a recent graduate of a university (to remain nameless). During my time on campus, I had many classes with multiple football, basketball, and baseball players. During these classes, many of the athletes would not attend class. If they did attend class, they often would act very immature and cause disruption in the classroom. Some were lucky to even spell their own names. It would never fail though that these same players would pass the classes and be in the more advanced class the next semester.

I understand that not every student athlete is the same and there are some that do take their education seriously, but the majority of the ones that I have met, seen, and interacted with do not. THIS is the reason why an academic scholarship plus free room,board,meals,etc. are not enough for these players anymore (that do not see a free education as a monetary value). I am under the belief that if universities start paying athletes to play certain sports, our society will prove that Darwinism has completely taken over. That sends the message to the future generations that you don't have to try at school or become more knowledgeable about the world, as long as you have a unique body type that can dribble,throw, or catch, you will have far more advantages than the "normal" student/human being. This will give way to the phasing out of the mid major along with many other unintended consequences that come with putting a plan into action such as education around the country plummeting and being replaced by practicing a sport that will pay to go to college.

I am of the mindset that just because something has been done a certain way for so long, it does not mean that it can not be changed and made better. Saying it can not be changed only closes the door for discussion. I am completely OPPOSED to flat out paying of players/students to play a sport. However, I am not oblivious to the money the NCAA is racking in at these players expense. A great paradox indeed.

As stated previously, I am a recent college graduate and my gf has an accounting degree with an economics masters from the same university. We have been talking about the recent FBI scandal and wanted to come up with a plan that would compensate the players fairly, but also not send the message that just because you're not 6'8", and can't dunk or tackle, you, your interests, and your contribution to this world isn't any less important.

I understand this plan is not perfect and I am not claiming to be a financial wizard. I am looking for discussion as to how this plan could be made better and I know there is no other place better to do achieve that goal then on Rupp Rafters so here it goes:

1. The respective player files for an alternative financial aid agreement before arriving to university
2. The respective player is qualified to receive full or part tuition, room, board, meals, etc. (basically how a scholarship works currently)
3. If the respective player is a full scholarship athlete, the respective player will receive 1% of the profits generated through their respective sport PER YEAR. (Would have to work out what a part scholarship player receives).
4. The amount the student athlete receives would then go into an interest bearing account the student athlete sets up on their behalf (mutual fund, IRA, etc.). The student athlete could also choose to let the athletic program keep the money as a loan. Student will receive a fixed interest rate during the time the school retains the loan.
5. If the student athlete GRADUATES, they will receive the compensation from the athletic department as services to the school while also receiving a free education, meals, clothing, room and board, big man on campus status, etc.
6. If the player leaves college early and signs a contract for athletic services of any kind OR the athlete/family/anyone related to their recruitment is proven to have colluded with sports agents or received any kind of impermissible benefit, they are required to convey the compensation they have received from the athletic department back to the university or to a charity of their choice. TAX BENEFITS included. (If player leaves early and signs a professional contract AND caught colliding with agents/ taking extra benefits, the student athlete is required to pay back the compensation he/she has received PLUS matching that amount as a fine that must be paid back to the school or a charity of their choice).
7. In order for the student athlete or university to be required to partake in this plan, the respective universities athletic department must be generating profits well over the national average (certain percentages would have to be ratified).
8. The respective player may receive a loan from a university/financial institution for "living expenses" but loan must be repaid within a certain time. (Payment plan can be worked out)
9. If the student athlete graduates from the respective university, the student athlete is eligible to receive their compensation ONLY if they have complied with all the previous guidelines AND they have taken at least 6 credit hours of an investment/ financial management course. (Student must maintain at least a 2.5 GPA throughout the entirety of their career).

This is all I have at the moment but I know their are a lot of great minds on this board that can help tweak this out, point out the flaws, or just flat out shred it to pieces lol. I know @irishcat1965 is a lawyer and may be able to add some insight to whether or not something along these lines could be a viable plan. For those of you that read all the way through, I thank you! GO CATS and I feel like we have a real shot to bring home #9 this year as we can guard and score from all 5 positions when we are hot.

P.S. Duke and Carolina can suck a ****
The " Never Met A Long Sentence I Didn't Like" award goes to you.
 

CalipariCapo

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2018
1,609
2,824
0
Ending 1nDone will remove a lot of pressure. Agents and shoe companies are not clamoring to sign players in the 20 and up rankings.
I don't think this will fix the issue with agents looking to get in on athletes while they are in high school (which leads to parents/handlers getting paid in order to influence the player to go to a certain school). There are only around 10 players per class that are good enough to jump straight from high school to the NBA. Limiting their options of the players they go after would be bad for business. The players that leave school after two years will still need agents. You can bet agencies like ASM will be all over these kids and their families during the time they are in school trying to pressure them to sign with their agency when they are eventually eligible to leave (after 2 years or whatever it may be).
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
I do not think every scholarship player should be compensated. Only those athletes that are at major universities that bring in multi millions of dollars per year and are in the media every day should be compensated. Under the plan I provided, it provides incentive for the student athlete to stay in school and work towards a degree knowing that they will have money waiting for them when they get out. If the athletic department brings in 1 million per year, the athlete will receive 10,000 per year. That is enough to pay off a loan they take out from the university or financial institution to cover living expenses. That's why there is the stipulation that the athletic department must be making a profit well over the national average in order to implement this plan. Besides, let's be honest, this is only an issue in regards to schools that have major athletic departments and make a crap ton of money ever year because that is where the market for these athletes are.
Ok, so you do realize that schools categorize revenue and expenses differently. Not to mention, very few athletic departments show a profit. Take Villanova as an example. There is no profit. You would instantly relegate them to mid major status, along with most universities, if top players couldn't make their 1%. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cb...lanova-gets-its-moneys-worth-from-basketball/
 
  • Like
Reactions: CalipariCapo

Bkocats

Heisman
Jan 2, 2011
80,845
69,725
67
It's not a bad first cut at a plan, but if you give the player 1% they are going to get paid more at some schools than others. That would make it hard to implement.
Not to mention the outcry from other universities because those players would only attend the ones with the highest revenue
 

CalipariCapo

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2018
1,609
2,824
0
Ok, so you do realize that schools categorize revenue and expenses differently. Not to mention, very few athletic departments show a profit. Take Villanova as an example. There is no profit. You would instantly relegate them to mid major status, along with most universities, if top players couldn't make their 1%. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cb...lanova-gets-its-moneys-worth-from-basketball/
From what I gathered in that article Villanova is using the profits that it is being generated in the major sports (basketball, football) to fund non-revenue generating sports at the university. Under the plan I presented, the respective athletic program would have to be generating a profit well above national average in order to achieve the compensation for the players at years end. Also, in a situation like Villanova they would be forced to make the decision whether or not to keep the sports that are losing money and roll with the sports that are generating money for the university/NCAA. And under all circumstances, I consider Villanova to be a mid major. They are not in a power 5 conference, athletic department does not generate a profit, and is a private school that only accepts a certain amount of students. This is an interesting topic though. This is definitely a situation that would have to get ironed out. Good catch
 

Bluesnky

All-American
Jan 24, 2013
6,363
9,715
0
I don't think the NCAA setting up take it or leave it compensation terms is workable. I'm not even sure it would be legal.
 

CalipariCapo

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2018
1,609
2,824
0
Not to mention the outcry from other universities because those players would only attend the ones with the highest revenue
That is where the big time players end up anyways @Bkocats. If a 5* player ends up at Florida Gulf Coast or Western Kentucky, there is probably something fishy going on behind the scenes in that recruitment.
 

JLK83

Senior
Apr 14, 2005
4,669
479
0
The big money in college sports is generated by football. BigBlueFanGA is right that a lot of the money gets consumed by funding the non-revenue sports (every sport except football and MBB). Title IX requires that a lot of money gets spread around to women's sports.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CalipariCapo

CalipariCapo

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2018
1,609
2,824
0
I don't think the NCAA setting up take it or leave it compensation terms is workable. I'm not even sure it would be legal.
What do you mean in regards to take it or leave it? The only way the player can not receive their compensation is if they violate the NCAA eligibility rules or leave early and sign a professional contract. Otherwise, they are fully entitled to the money they have earned while being a student athlete.
 

irishcat1965

Heisman
Apr 22, 2012
20,478
43,334
113
*Lengthy but PLEASE read*

Hello fellow wildcat fans! I have been a long time reader of this board for many years (since the fast paste days lmao) and have finally broke down, bit the bullet and created an account. Part of the reason is because there is so much talk these days of compensation for athletes and doing away with "amateurism" at the collegiate level (the other reason is because I love my fellow cats fans and live to talk good, knowledgeable basketball).

I am a recent graduate of a university (to remain nameless). During my time on campus, I had many classes with multiple football, basketball, and baseball players. During these classes, many of the athletes would not attend class. If they did attend class, they often would act very immature and cause disruption in the classroom. Some were lucky to even spell their own names. It would never fail though that these same players would pass the classes and be in the more advanced class the next semester.

I understand that not every student athlete is the same and there are some that do take their education seriously, but the majority of the ones that I have met, seen, and interacted with do not. THIS is the reason why an academic scholarship plus free room,board,meals,etc. are not enough for these players anymore (that do not see a free education as a monetary value). I am under the belief that if universities start paying athletes to play certain sports, our society will prove that Darwinism has completely taken over. That sends the message to the future generations that you don't have to try at school or become more knowledgeable about the world, as long as you have a unique body type that can dribble,throw, or catch, you will have far more advantages than the "normal" student/human being. This will give way to the phasing out of the mid major along with many other unintended consequences that come with putting a plan into action such as education around the country plummeting and being replaced by practicing a sport that will pay to go to college.

I am of the mindset that just because something has been done a certain way for so long, it does not mean that it can not be changed and made better. Saying it can not be changed only closes the door for discussion. I am completely OPPOSED to flat out paying of players/students to play a sport. However, I am not oblivious to the money the NCAA is racking in at these players expense. A great paradox indeed.

As stated previously, I am a recent college graduate and my gf has an accounting degree with an economics masters from the same university. We have been talking about the recent FBI scandal and wanted to come up with a plan that would compensate the players fairly, but also not send the message that just because you're not 6'8", and can't dunk or tackle, you, your interests, and your contribution to this world isn't any less important.

I understand this plan is not perfect and I am not claiming to be a financial wizard. I am looking for discussion as to how this plan could be made better and I know there is no other place better to do achieve that goal then on Rupp Rafters so here it goes:

1. The respective player files for an alternative financial aid agreement before arriving to university
2. The respective player is qualified to receive full or part tuition, room, board, meals, etc. (basically how a scholarship works currently)
3. If the respective player is a full scholarship athlete, the respective player will receive 1% of the profits generated through their respective sport PER YEAR. (Would have to work out what a part scholarship player receives).
4. The amount the student athlete receives would then go into an interest bearing account the student athlete sets up on their behalf (mutual fund, IRA, etc.). The student athlete could also choose to let the athletic program keep the money as a loan. Student will receive a fixed interest rate during the time the school retains the loan.
5. If the student athlete GRADUATES, they will receive the compensation from the athletic department as services to the school while also receiving a free education, meals, clothing, room and board, big man on campus status, etc.
6. If the player leaves college early and signs a contract for athletic services of any kind OR the athlete/family/anyone related to their recruitment is proven to have colluded with sports agents or received any kind of impermissible benefit, they are required to convey the compensation they have received from the athletic department back to the university or to a charity of their choice. TAX BENEFITS included. (If player leaves early and signs a professional contract AND caught colliding with agents/ taking extra benefits, the student athlete is required to pay back the compensation he/she has received PLUS matching that amount as a fine that must be paid back to the school or a charity of their choice).
7. In order for the student athlete or university to be required to partake in this plan, the respective universities athletic department must be generating profits well over the national average (certain percentages would have to be ratified).
8. The respective player may receive a loan from a university/financial institution for "living expenses" but loan must be repaid within a certain time. (Payment plan can be worked out)
9. If the student athlete graduates from the respective university, the student athlete is eligible to receive their compensation ONLY if they have complied with all the previous guidelines AND they have taken at least 6 credit hours of an investment/ financial management course. (Student must maintain at least a 2.5 GPA throughout the entirety of their career).

This is all I have at the moment but I know their are a lot of great minds on this board that can help tweak this out, point out the flaws, or just flat out shred it to pieces lol. I know @irishcat1965 is a lawyer and may be able to add some insight to whether or not something along these lines could be a viable plan. For those of you that read all the way through, I thank you! GO CATS and I feel like we have a real shot to bring home #9 this year as we can guard and score from all 5 positions when we are hot.

P.S. Duke and Carolina can suck a ****
I have no idea what the answer is. I know the current system is broken. What exactly is fair to the players and the universities is difficult to figure out since any solution seems open to manipulation and exploitation.
 

CalipariCapo

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2018
1,609
2,824
0
I have no idea what the answer is. I know the current system is broken. What exactly is fair to the players and the universities is difficult to figure out since any solution seems open to manipulation and exploitation.
It is a great paradox that would take a board of 50-100 of the countries most prominent coaches, NCAA regulators, lawyers, AAU coaches, former recruits, anybody related to college sports in any way.
 

Bkocats

Heisman
Jan 2, 2011
80,845
69,725
67
That is where the big time players end up anyways @Bkocats. If a 5* player ends up at Florida Gulf Coast or Western Kentucky, there is probably something fishy going on behind the scenes in that recruitment.
Not always
But the disparity would be even worse than it is now. Then, too, in the interest of sportsmanship, unfair advantage would
How many schools (and I’m only talking basketball here) generate enough of a profit to pay each scholarship player that amount, anyway?
FWIW I do appreciate the thought you put into this. I hope the powers that be put as much consideration
 

Bkocats

Heisman
Jan 2, 2011
80,845
69,725
67
Some very good discussions but i am just not in favor of paying athletes. A lot of people who are not athletes do not get the opportunity to get a free education like those who are gifted to play sports. JMO
I don’t mind the idea of them making money for their likenesses used in media. As long as there are ground rules for it. Doesn’t seem like that would give any school an unfair advantage. not autographs though
 
  • Like
Reactions: westerncat

CalipariCapo

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2018
1,609
2,824
0
Some very good discussions but i am just not in favor of paying athletes. A lot of people who are not athletes do not get the opportunity to get a free education like those who are gifted to play sports. JMO
I whole heartedly agree. Just like I am now going through the process of figuring out how to pay back my student loans, I would have LOVED to have a full ride to play a sport. I would have saw that as monetary value enough but unfortunately a lot of the big time athletes do not see this as fair compensation (which you can't blame them with the amount of money being drawn in). In the grand scheme of things, it is unfortunate that as a people/ society, we put this much value on sports more so than true academic caricular. I believe straight up paying players to come to a university to play a sport (when they're already being given countless more opportunities than the regular student) will open up a can of worms that we will never come back from.
 

CalipariCapo

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2018
1,609
2,824
0
I don’t mind the idea of them making money for their likenesses used in media. As long as there are ground rules for it. Doesn’t seem like that would give any school an unfair advantage. not autographs though
I also thought of this while coming up with the proposed plan but then I thought "well how do they differentiate between what Johnny David should receive compared to Kevin Knox even though they are both putting in the same amount of work and time? (Honestly johnny is putting in more work being an IT/math major whereas Kevin is skating in his gen ed classes until he enters the draft). There are so many variables to account for it is ridiculous.
 
Feb 21, 2006
8,403
9,162
0
The NCAA cannot pay every student athlete...very much anyway...so folks need to stop with the "NCAA makes billions and should players argument..."...if NCAA pays players it won't be enough, and they'd eventually run out of money...

There are roughly 460,000 student athletes. The NCAA makes about 1 billion in revenue a year. That comes out to about $2,173 per player.

Texas A&M athletic department makes the most money at about 190 million. Enough to pay players right?

Well let's think about all the expenses without additional pay to players on top of everything else they get. Major projects (renovations, new facilities, etc), coaches salaries, employee salaries, scholarships, money spent on pampering athletes (chefs, nutritionists, massage therapists, gear, etc), travel for all, recruiting budgets, marketing, etc...

I'm not entirely sure what all that adds up to be but I'm sure it's a pretty penny.

Now, that's not to say I'm totally against paying players a bit more, but I would like to know exactly how much money people think athletic departments can spare. Sure they make a lot of money, but they are not pro franchises ran by billionaires.

I would also like to point out that the "free market" argument is a can of worms people will eventually have issues with.

The second the revenue sports have to start bidding and paying for top talent, will be the second budgets of non rev sports get slashed...I mean "free market" right?

It's all fun to "stand with" the players and lock arms until women's sports start to go by way of the dodo.

What happens when players feel they're not getting paid enough? What happens when football starts to take all the money because they make all the money and have an additional 53 checks to write, at least...the big football schools will be writing checks to a hundred kids and pissing on their volleyball, gymnastics, soccer, golf, softball, and probably even baseball programs.

Also, some of that additional player cost will be passed on to us...ticket prices, merchandise, autographs, etc...

Real red pill and rabbit hole situation folks, that I'm not sure people really want to embark on...
 
Last edited: