Kickoff

PBRME

All-Conference
Feb 12, 2004
10,950
4,692
113
The call was he made a fair catch after the ball hit the ground, which would put the ball down where it’s caught like a punt. My problem is I’ve never seen a fair catch enforced after a live ball hits the ground.
 

ZombieKissinger

All-American
May 29, 2013
4,953
8,244
113
The call was he made a fair catch after the ball hit the ground, which would put the ball down where it’s caught like a punt. My problem is I’ve never seen a fair catch enforced after a live ball hits the ground.

Is that same approach allowed for onside kicks?
 

IBleedMaroonDawg

All-American
Nov 12, 2007
25,571
9,781
113
I have a feeling though if he caught it on the bounce and was hit then fumbled it was still would've been a fumble in their eyes.
 

Go Budaw

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
7,321
0
36
The call was he made a fair catch after the ball hit the ground, which would put the ball down where it’s caught like a punt. My problem is I’ve never seen a fair catch enforced after a live ball hits the ground.

That’s something I don’t even think you can do on a kickoff. Otherwise, why wouldn’t you just wave the arm as soon as an onside kick hits the ground and never give the kicking team a chance at it?
 

PBRME

All-Conference
Feb 12, 2004
10,950
4,692
113
That’s something I don’t even think you can do on a kickoff. Otherwise, why wouldn’t you just wave the arm as soon as an onside kick hits the ground and never give the kicking team a chance at it?

I agree. If he made no attempt to catch the ball and KY covered I guarantee they would’ve awarded it to KY.
 

PirateDawg

Redshirt
Jan 9, 2020
1,751
0
0
I think if you advance the ball after making a fair catch it is a penalty. He was actually calling his blockers over but his arm went over his shoulder pads.
 

Chesusdog

All-Conference
May 2, 2006
4,810
4,792
113
I think if you advance the ball after making a fair catch it is a penalty. He was actually calling his blockers over but his arm went over his shoulder pads.

I have never seen anything like it in my life. His arms were churning while he was running and may have extended upwards a bit but that's not what a fair catch signal is. Just sticking your arm up doesn't count. You have to raise your arm over your head and do a crossing motion. I think replay has made the refs stupid/lazy. The number of ****** calls, a rare few of which we've benefited from, is inexcusable and there needs to be accountability.
 

dog12

Senior
Sep 15, 2016
1,944
580
113
The call was he made a fair catch after the ball hit the ground, which would put the ball down where it’s caught like a punt. My problem is I’ve never seen a fair catch enforced after a live ball hits the ground.

Fat-fingered a down vote.
 

PineGroveBully

Redshirt
Nov 13, 2007
8,508
2
0
I had never seen it on a kickoff until last weekend, can’t remember if it was college or pro. Seems it was the SNF game, waved for fair catch at around the 15, ball was placed at 25.
 

Lawdawg.sixpack

All-Conference
Jul 22, 2012
5,337
1,161
113
^^^ he had to adjust slightly while in full stride after the ball bounced. That’s why his arm went up.

But i think the fair catch rule is that any movement above the shoulders counts as a fair catch signal.

GARBAGE call though.
 

PineGroveBully

Redshirt
Nov 13, 2007
8,508
2
0
They only did it to honor the baseball team, you’re probably not going to see it again until our next natty
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
57,079
26,679
113
How can you even have a fair catch if the ball hits the ground? There's no such thing. And, as you point out in your other post in the thread, he never signaled for a fair catch in the first place. He was trying to grab the damn football.