Khalil Davis

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
I believe he led cfb with eight sacks at tackle. And being 3-4, sometimes he just ate blocks.
Carlos doesn't have the footwork like Khalil.
Not surprising, now,can we get some damn LBs?
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
8 sacks for Khalil, 4 for Carlos, they led the team, Domann and Tannor tied for fourth with 2.5 each.
Alex Davis, nada
 

Suhrreal

All-Conference
Jun 1, 2009
7,380
1,049
0
Been saying this for the past year...K. Davis was our best player on defense, and his DL mates were right behind him. Like the guy in the Twitter responses said, some clowns in Husker Nation were saying it would be addition by subtraction on the DL next season. That is not likely...
 
Jan 24, 2004
56,014
17,313
113
Been saying this for the past year...K. Davis was our best player on defense, and his DL mates were right behind him. Like the guy in the Twitter responses said, some clowns in Husker Nation were saying it would be addition by subtraction on the DL next season. That is not likely...
D line will take a step back but their is a bunch of talent to build with. LBs will be light years better. Secondary will improve with more talent and depth as well.
 

huskerssalts

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2014
7,213
2,216
0
D line will take a step back but their is a bunch of talent to build with. LBs will be light years better. Secondary will improve with more talent and depth as well.

our Dline was a strength. I had it out with a few on here about that. Our secondary and Dline should continue improve with the LBs slowly catching up.
 

huskerssalts

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2014
7,213
2,216
0
Some guys think our dline sucked. That's how bad our linebackers were.

agreed, our Dline wasn’t the issue. They held their ground and got pressure...it was our LBs that weren’t any good or very good. Give us some legit LBs back there this past season and we see a completely different defense...GBR
 

NorthwoodHusker

Sophomore
Jun 20, 2019
3,526
156
0
agreed, our Dline wasn’t the issue. They held their ground and got pressure...it was our LBs that weren’t any good or very good. Give us some legit LBs back there this past season and we see a completely different defense...GBR
Plus some healthy safeties for pass defense packages for three or four wide sets.
 

Clemke32

Freshman
Sep 29, 2017
970
99
18
our Dline was a strength. I had it out with a few on here about that. Our secondary and Dline should continue improve with the LBs slowly catching up.
I think a lot of people that took issue with our Dline were people who did not/ do not understand the responsibilities of the DL in the 3-4.... our LBers where seriously that bad that we had d linemen in a 3-4 playing the role of d-linemen in a 4-3... you seen our line get more aggressive and try to rush the passer instead of staying in their gaps to eat blocks to free up the LBers... once you have that the 3-4 turns very ineffective
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,458
2,000
113
I think a lot of people that took issue with our Dline were people who did not/ do not understand the responsibilities of the DL in the 3-4.... our LBers where seriously that bad that we had d linemen in a 3-4 playing the role of d-linemen in a 4-3... you seen our line get more aggressive and try to rush the passer instead of staying in their gaps to eat blocks to free up the LBers... once you have that the 3-4 turns very ineffective
Our Dline didn't do a good job at eating blocks. Our linebackers were worse, but our Dline absolutely was a problem last year.
 

GeorgeFlippin

Heisman
May 29, 2001
38,548
35,531
113
In games against like or lesser talent, the D-Line was fair to good, but against tOSU, Minnesota, Indiana, Wisconsin, Purdue, they were handled for the most part.

The effort in just about all games was there, hopefully the staff can make inroads the next few years with a defense that is more athletic, opportunistic, and wreaks a bit more havoc.

Hopefully the Davis boys will have some long term success at the next level.
 

Clemke32

Freshman
Sep 29, 2017
970
99
18
Our Dline didn't do a good job at eating blocks. Our linebackers were worse, but our Dline absolutely was a problem last year.
yes our Dline was a problem, in the manor like I expressed, they were trying to get some pressure on the QB which made them lose gap control/ not eat up blocks, so the line not only didn’t have to double team like they should have to do to a 3-4 they were able to use our DL’s aggression to free up two more of their OL to block LBers...as they’ll just use the big bodies momentum to over run the pocket and step up into it...
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,458
2,000
113
In games against like or lesser talent, the D-Line was fair to good, but against tOSU, Minnesota, Indiana, Wisconsin, Purdue, they were handled for the most part.

The effort in just about all games was there, hopefully the staff can make inroads the next few years with a defense that is more athletic, opportunistic, and wreaks a bit more havoc.

Hopefully the Davis boys will have some long term success at the next level.
I think that's a good way to sum it up. Any offense with a pulse and our defensive line was gashed, but they did hold up well to lower competition.
 

HCHTown

Freshman
Oct 21, 2012
137
84
0
The OHio State running backs had a hard time catching up to their offensive line as they drive our DL back. Their OL got three yards at least before the backs got there.
 

huskerssalts

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2014
7,213
2,216
0
The OHio State running backs had a hard time catching up to their offensive line as they drive our DL back. Their OL got three yards at least before the backs got there.

You’re bringing up the OSU game, who didn’t OSU make look silly? Maybe Clemson that played LSU close in the National Title game. OSU even beat down Wisconsin twice. And I disagree, our Dline did okay against them. Our LBs looked like a joke.
 
Last edited:

huskerssalts

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2014
7,213
2,216
0
I think that's a good way to sum it up. Any offense with a pulse and our defensive line was gashed, but they did hold up well to lower competition.

they held up fairly well against Wisconsin and Iowa both. Again our LBs didn’t but our Dline usually did solid. Hell Khalil Davis is showing his skills now against some elite talent. He didn’t suddenly get solid to good.
 

USNHusker

Junior
Jan 12, 2018
237
249
43
Getting D Williams back will be huge. Him and Dismuke will lay the wood in some fools.

I don't think you're in the right forum. I hope our guys aren't laying wood IN our opponent's Laughing Laughing Could make for an interesting pornhub video, if you're into that sort of thing...SmokinSmokin
 

little a

Senior
Jul 4, 2001
2,134
705
0
Getting D Williams back will be huge. Him and Dismuke will lay the wood in some fools.

Dismuke wiffed A LOT .......just want sure tacklers in the back line. The game is past “laying the wood”- you do that your ejected. See last nights game with Clemson LB
 

Huskers_Rule

Senior
Jul 11, 2001
4,092
463
0
Been saying this for the past year...K. Davis was our best player on defense, and his DL mates were right behind him. Like the guy in the Twitter responses said, some clowns in Husker Nation were saying it would be addition by subtraction on the DL next season. That is not likely...

We'll miss the Davis boys for sure.
 

daddy mack

Senior
Jan 19, 2002
1,924
506
0
I think a lot of people that took issue with our Dline were people who did not/ do not understand the responsibilities of the DL in the 3-4.... our LBers where seriously that bad that we had d linemen in a 3-4 playing the role of d-linemen in a 4-3... you seen our line get more aggressive and try to rush the passer instead of staying in their gaps to eat blocks to free up the LBers... once you have that the 3-4 turns very ineffective
Let’s not get carried away, because one talent scout is raving about him. Doesn’t make him right. How often do these guys get it wrong? It the Eagles too. So let’s not anoint him the best DL in the country just yet. Why do Nebraska fans always take the ball and try to advance it further up the field.
 

Clemke32

Freshman
Sep 29, 2017
970
99
18
Let’s not get carried away, because one talent scout is raving about him. Doesn’t make him right. How often do these guys get it wrong? It the Eagles too. So let’s not anoint him the best DL in the country just yet. Why do Nebraska fans always take the ball and try to advance it further up the field.
it’s kind of ironic that you’re asking that question... seeming as how In absolutely none of my posts I anointed any of our DL the best in the world... I think the just of my points and the point of the op was that our DL was not as bad as what people thought and I tried outlining why people may have thought that way... Now it does say something to his credit that he was one of the better ones out there on day one, but you are correct right now that means very little... it just helps him in the possibility of getting drafted... he won’t be the first DL off the board he won’t be a day one pick or day 2 pick but a good performance here may get him a shot at day 3 and roster spot for training camp and a chance to prove himself... I think you’re the one that took the ball and ran with it there
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,458
2,000
113
they held up fairly well against Wisconsin and Iowa both. Again our LBs didn’t but our Dline usually did solid. Hell Khalil Davis is showing his skills now against some elite talent. He didn’t suddenly get solid to good.
I wouldn't consider the Shrine bowl elite talent. Khalil Davis is a decent player and I don't think the coaching or schemes he had while playing here helped him out much.
 

TheBeav815

All-American
Feb 19, 2007
18,955
5,101
0
If they had gotten to stay as 4-3 DTs it likely would have been a lot more evident how good the twins are.
 

Kakdawg

Heisman
Sep 8, 2004
35,377
15,512
113



Not suprised at all. Funny i just had discussions a few weeks ago with a guy saying he or the Davis twins werent that good at all. One even said they were "they were the slowest 3-4 DEs in the country".

That said both those guys played outta position because of need. Carlos was beefed up a bit much last year to play NG when they had noone. Both those guys have NFL talent as 4-3 DGs. I also think Daniels has a chance.But Kahlil especially was pretty damn good this year.


Holla
 

inWV

All-Conference
Sep 22, 2007
14,188
4,836
91
Not suprised at all. Funny i just had discussions a few weeks ago with a guy saying he or the Davis twins werent that good at all. One even said they were "they were the slowest 3-4 DEs in the country".

That said both those guys played outta position because of need. Carlos was beefed up a bit much last year to play NG when they had noone. Both those guys have NFL talent as 4-3 DGs. I also think Daniels has a chance.But Kahlil especially was pretty damn good this year.


Holla
This. The Davis twins were recruited as DTs in a 4-3, not DEs in a 3-4. And it's very possible that whatever level Carlos could have produced at as a 3-4 DE was hampered by the year of having to take reps at NT. Carlos was the twin that produced early (42 tackles as a sophomore vs. 15 for Khalil in 2017, 24 vs. 5 in 2016).