Keep an Eye Out For a Nice Article in Two Weeks
- Thread starter ArcherSPS
- Start date
Nice. Although I wish you hadn't said anything. Now I'm like a kid waiting on Christmas morning. But 2 weeks? I've seen UM pull some pretty desperate stuff out of their asses in less time than that. Once they catch wind of this I can see them stopping it somehow.
So basically the NCAA just sits back and let's the media uncover ****---then the NCAA reads the article---then he the NCAA comes and does an "investigation"---then at the end of the "investigation" the NCAA types up / copies exactly what the article said, prints it on their NCAA Letterhead, and calls it a "Notice Of Allegations".
Don't get me wrong I am happy for Ole Miss to FINALLY get what they deserve. I just think that the NCAA should share some of their salary and health care benefits with members of the Press---since the Press seems to do a lot of "leg work" for the NCAA.
View attachment 4313
Don't get me wrong I am happy for Ole Miss to FINALLY get what they deserve. I just think that the NCAA should share some of their salary and health care benefits with members of the Press---since the Press seems to do a lot of "leg work" for the NCAA.
View attachment 4313
The best part of the Tunsil fiasco is that he was answering a question from an OM beat writer. What a clown show they are.
I am skeptical the NCAA would even do that much. Remember in 2011, right after the Cam Newton deal, four former Auburn players appeared on HBO's Real Sports and claimed they were given various amounts of cash? Nothing ever came from that. Their stories could not be corroborated, and the Auburn family had all sorts of ways to trash the players' credibility.
I look forward to seeing whatever gets published, but until I see it I find it hard to speculate on it having any impact other than more bad PR.
I look forward to seeing whatever gets published, but until I see it I find it hard to speculate on it having any impact other than more bad PR.
Big difference in Auburn 2011 and Mississippi today. The NCAA shut down an Auburn investigation before it even got started. They spent next to nothing looking into the Auburn allegations. They've spent a lot of time, effort and money investigating Mississippi. It's rare for them to spend that much money and then just walk away.
The landscape changed dramatically in 2013.....after the NCAA ended up scandalized by the U of Miami investigation they cleaned house and the rules/regs changed. A head coach can no longer get by with 'plausible deniability'....he/she is responsible for what goes on with their recruiting. Also, a better/clearer category of charges and related punishment for those charges.
I'm just talking about the impact the article might have. The current NOA and follow-up investigation will take care of themselves. I am just skeptical that any upcoming article will have much impact on the outcome, or cause the NCAA to further extend their investigation. Remains to be seen what is in the article, but if its just some former players making allegations I doubt it will go very far.
Nothing new in that. Great encapsulation of events, but the only thing new-ish is a little more detail of what Miller already told the NCAA.
Latest
-
01
Maroon and White Football
Lopsided analytics illustrate Mississippi State's collapse against Auburn
-
02
Maroon and White Football
"Not good enough": Jeff Lebby answers questions of performance and job security following blowout loss to Auburn
-
03
Maroon and White Football
Rapid Recap: Auburn 41-9 Mississippi State
-
04
Maroon and White Football
Last Call Predictions for Mississippi State vs. Auburn
-
05
Maroon and White Football
Mississippi State vs. Auburn: How, where and when to watch the Bulldogs