Also, in the NIT that juggernaut we all know as Oakland beats Clemson. Woowee that mighty ACC.by a final of 95-88, already one of the mighty ACC teams knocked out ! Some analysts had WF going as far as the Sweet 16 ..... Guess NOT !
Most people aren't denying they have 3 legit teams and another 2 really solid teams at a minimum but it's bogus the hype they get too to bottom to the point that excuses are made for losing to NC State at home and Clemson had a real shot at gettin in the tournament. They didn't deserve 9 bids.Yes, because the ACC's reputation comes from its bottom feeders... Not guaranteeing the ACC will dominate the tournament, but let's wait until the legit teams start playing. Was it not a few years back that they had 3 teams in the elite 8?
Oh sure, the pundits love blowing some manure flavored ACC smoke but a lot of people on here swing wildly in the opposite direction. They're not the be all, end all that Bilas would have you believe but they're still the best BB conference by a wide margin imo (a lot like SEC FB).Well I would hope the higher seeds would be harder to beat but I think everyone's point is maybe the ACC isn't as strong as the media wanted folks to believe.
Their reputation comes from fake classes, jewelry purchases, buying whores for minors, and diddling children.Yes, because the ACC's reputation comes from its bottom feeders... Not guaranteeing the ACC will dominate the tournament, but let's wait until the legit teams start playing. Was it not a few years back that they had 3 teams in the elite 8?
Well I would hope the higher seeds would be harder to beat but I think everyone's point is maybe the ACC isn't as strong as the media wanted folks to believe.
To be fair, KSU was in 6th place in the Big 12 and Wake was in 10th place in the ACC