You are the one with no sense of logic.......certain guns have no purpose in general population other than military purposes. Civilians have no expectations to these type of weapons, thus it is time for the Supreme Court to state what is and is not allowed under the 2nd Amendment.
They have. Numerous times. You all just don’t like their answer apparently as we keep having these stupid debates that you all don’t win and don’t accept.You are the one with no sense of logic.......certain guns have no purpose in general population other than military purposes. Civilians have no expectations to these type of weapons, thus it is time for the Supreme Court to state what is and is not allowed under the 2nd Amendment.
That article is about a GVRO. I think in most states a restraining order by the school sytem against him would be sufficient.
That is how it is in WV now. If your ex gets a restraining order against you in WV they will take your guns. You can get them back but you have to go through a process.So you piss off an ex, she gets a restraining order and you could lose your rights?
That article is about a GVRO. I think in most states a restraining order by the school sytem against him would be sufficient.
Thanks for the article.
In WV and most states I think it is a state law.I'm not so sure it would apply much differently since federal laws deal specifically with domestic violence restraining orders.
In WV and most states I think it is a state law.
Florida has four types of orders, the only potential order would be the "repeated violence" order which is harder to get than a DV one. I doubt anything he had done rises to that level, especially considering the two incident rule. Even then it would have taken an additional court order to remove the guns, it's not automatic like in a DV order.
https://www.floridabar.org/news/tfb-journal/?durl=/DIVCOM/JN/JNJournal01.nsf/Articles/E113E62B111CA2E585256DF300631EE7