I think you are talking about different things. Frost’s talk of following the Osborne path has to do with S&C, nutrition, life skills, academic support, the walk on program. Klatt was talking about recruiting a bunch speedy players and playing an up tempo pace. Under Kelly/ Helfrich (before Frost left for UCF) Oregon typically finished anywhere from 15-25 in the recruiting rankings, with a year or 2 near 10.
I think he is dead on with what he is saying.
Well if this is a semantics battle over the meaning of 'path' count me out but I will just say that offensive X&Os do not a path make and Frost has repeatedly said he is here to install an Osborne v2.0 plan not an Oregon v2.0 deal. Either Klatt doesn't know this or he ignored it.
Klatt placed his emphasis on Frost's adaptations of Kelly's offensive schemes and that is thin stuff. For one thing, there is a whole other side of the football - defense. Frost has no interest in Oregon's less than stellar defensive results.
Klatt:
“I do think there’s a path for Nebraska,” he said. “It might be a more narrow path, which is fine, but again this is why Scott is so uniquely suited for Nebraska. Whether he had played there or not, his coaching background and blueprint, stems largely from what happened at Oregon. The Ducks were a perennial football power for a better part of a decade, and they did that without a natural, local recruiting base. That’s very rare in college football. Because of that Nebraska is going to employ that model. Can they get back to the top? Yes. Is it more narrow? Absolutely. Is he the perfect fit for that model? Absolutely.”
So Klatt thinks Nebraska has a narrow path to success and it is to put the Oregon stamp on Lincoln? That's nonsense and I'm pretty sure Frost would argue against both those assertions. Osborne carved a wide path to success and did it earlier and much longer than did Bellotti, Kelly, Helfrich.
Did you notice where Klatt coupled Oregon's decade of success with the fact that Eugene has no
natural, local recruiting base? Called it
rare and implied that Frost learned a valuable lesson there. No acknowledgment of Osborne's
decades of even greater success with an even smaller local recruiting base. Nebraska doesn't have a PAC 12 connection and a shared border with California and all those Cali kids.
Didn't Nebraska write the book on national recruiting and succeeding w/o a natural, local recruiting base? Klatt missed that.
No, I don't think Klatt is dead on, I think he missed the big picture and doesn't understand where Frost is coming from and where he is going.
It's always nice to read a positive article about Husker prospects but Klatt's summation missed the big picture.