To each his own, but I tend to believe Hayward makes a very small difference in what I believe is a very large gap between Cleveland and Boston. I'll be interested to see how Hayward does since he will no longer be flying under the radar: he is now expected to be an annual all-star, expected to tighten the gap between Boston and Cleveland etc.Would a trade of someone like Marc Gasol or Anthony Davis to Boston to go along with the core already in place change that in your view? I actually think Boston getting Hayward closes the gap a good deal. He is a legit threat every night. Boston had one legit offensive threat every night last year and Cleveland took full advantage of that for sure.
I do believe it has been smart of Boston to not go "all in" with George or Butler. Sure, it would have increased their odds in the East, but still wouldn't put them on the same planet as the Warriors. Seems like Boston is doing the smart thing- staying relevant now while still keeping all there future assets to pounce once Lebron gets old/ the Warriors slow down.
To answer your original question, Marc Gasol does nothing to get the Celtics closer to the Cavs in a shooting league IMO (he also couldn't be on the floor with Al Horford IMO, too slow) Anthony Davis makes all the difference in the world but I'd assume that means Boston mortgaged their whole future to get him.
Last edited: