You really don't understand that expression, do you?Correct. They had talented players with nothing to lose the last 2 weeks and still lost to "lesser" teams
Now, what does this mean for Iowa next Saturday? Ped State is now without a head coach or their starting QB.
Exactly.Doubtful.
Save this energy for after the game next week.............People are worried because a team that was ranked #2 preseason, had national title hopes and filled with 5 star talent is going to be jacked to play with a freshman QB and a interim head coach to get to 4-3? Listen to yourselves. Already making excuses. No, PSU is going to be down, not saying Iowa wins because PSU has more talent but there is no “rallying” around like you saw at UCLA. UCLA has one of the best QBs in the country that was ignrorantly used incorrectly. They’ve been in rebuilding mode for a decade, they’re still developing. PSU is not the same thing. I wouldn’t be surprised if you hear of guys sitting this week before bolting for the portal.
No. Your question was, "WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR IOWA?" It can clearly be seen in post #1 of this thread.This is exactly why we call him Eyes of Retard. The question is about how will the loss of their head coach and starting QB affect the game? Does this give Iowa a better chance to win? The loss of a head coach and a starting QB are vital components to how a game will play out. And I ask that question to the Hawkeye fanbase to get their take on it, as Penn State was a favorite last night, but the line has now moved towards Iowa.
More indisputable proof that Eyes of Retard isn't a Hawkeye fan. Just another worthless troll. Everything he says is disingenuous and in bad faith. He always beelines to my threads to troll, but always embarrasses himself. But when Iowa wins, he loses, so it's been a good weekend!
So an unknown at QB and a different coach won't change the way the defense preps for the game? Definitely not since Iowa doesn't emphasize defense during practice since Lester became the OC.No. Your question was, "WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR IOWA?" It can clearly be seen in post #1 of this thread.
You post a lot of stupid stuff that is easily called out. That is not my fault.
As for your question in the OP, I'm still trying to figure out what on earth you could be asking. What PSU's new qb and coach "mean for Iowa", is the Hawks have to prepare to try to win a ballgame. Just like every other game.
One wouldn't think the prep changes much, as if PSU makes changes, Iowa won't know until it happens in the game anyway. If anything, I guess Iowa might be more prepared to sell out against the run. But that's the way the Hawks play anyway. Perhaps take a few less chances on offense. But again, that's Iowa's DNA anyway.
As for your amended question, "how do PSU's losses affect the game?", of course it gives Iowa a better chance to win. There's a reason Allar was their starter. I don't know why a thread was needed to establish this.
How is any of this proof that I'm not a Hawkeye fan? Sometimes I seriously worry about you. Anyone that knows me would laugh in your face uncontrollably for saying I'm not a Hawkeye fan. I've watched every Iowa men's basketball and football game over the last 40 years at least twice.
Yes, it certainly has been a good weekend. Had my largest day of sports betting profit of the year yesterday. Won very big on Iowa after telling everyone in the pointspread thread that it was a great spot to bet Iowa. Heavily involved on the money line pregame. Also had Iowa-10 on an alternate line, and in-game wagers on Iowa 1st half, Iowa 3rd Q ml, and Iowa 4th Q ml. Yes definitely a good weekend for this Hawk.
Try again
Still a worthless, pathetic retard arguing in bad faith, huh? I get it. I've eviscerated you in so many threads on the other website that you have to derail any thread I post with garbage nonsense that makes no logical sense to anyone with an IQ above 12.No. Your question was, "WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR IOWA?" It can clearly be seen in post #1 of this thread.
You post a lot of stupid stuff that is easily called out. That is not my fault.
As for your question in the OP, I'm still trying to figure out what on earth you could be asking. What PSU's new qb and coach "mean for Iowa", is the Hawks have to prepare to try to win a ballgame. Just like every other game.
One wouldn't think the prep changes much, as if PSU makes changes, Iowa won't know until it happens in the game anyway. If anything, I guess Iowa might be more prepared to sell out against the run. But that's the way the Hawks play anyway. Perhaps take a few less chances on offense. But again, that's Iowa's DNA anyway.
As for your amended question, "how do PSU's losses affect the game?", of course it gives Iowa a better chance to win. There's a reason Allar was their starter. I don't know why a thread was needed to establish this.
How is any of this proof that I'm not a Hawkeye fan? Sometimes I seriously worry about you. Anyone that knows me would laugh in your face uncontrollably for saying I'm not a Hawkeye fan. I've watched every Iowa men's basketball and football game over the last 40 years at least twice.
Yes, it certainly has been a good weekend. Had my largest day of sports betting profit of the year yesterday. Won very big on Iowa after telling everyone in the pointspread thread that it was a great spot to bet Iowa. Heavily involved on the money line pregame. Also had Iowa-10 on an alternate line, and in-game wagers on Iowa 1st half, Iowa 3rd Q ml, and Iowa 4th Q ml. Yes definitely a good weekend for this Hawk.
Try again
No need for the mischaracterization. Have never said anything close to what you've implied in your last sentence.So an unknown at QB and a different coach won't change the way the defense preps for the game? Definitely not since Iowa doesn't emphasize defense during practice since Lester became the OC.
So you never said the defense wasn't getting the same emphasis in practice because a new offense was being installed?No need for the mischaracterization. Have never said anything close to what you've implied in your last sentence.
Yes, very little change in prep, as there is very little info on the new guys to prep for. As explained in the last post, Iowa's best guess is PSU will largely remain PSU. If PSU makes changes, Iowa won't find out until they see it on the field
The only thing you did on the last board was embarrass yourself by losing your mind a few times, like you just did here, and claimed to have blocked me, but chose rather to continue to complain about having to read my posts, like you just did here.Still a worthless, pathetic retard arguing in bad faith, huh? I get it. I've eviscerated you in so many threads on the other website that you have to derail any thread I post with garbage nonsense that makes no logical sense to anyone with an IQ above 12.
No. If you weren't such a retard, you would understand from the get go what my question meant. The question is about the game. It wasn't amended, I had to break it down to its most basic form so you could understand it. Or because you continue to post in bad faith because you hate Iowa and its fans. Losing a coach and a QB will affect how the game plays out. Fact. Thus the question, what does this mean for Iowa in the upcoming game. And the entire point of a board is to discuss news, predict game outcomes, debate strategies, and more. But then again, this requires you to not huff your own farts and think for once. Read better, fuckboy.
It absolutely sucks that we have to deal with such a worthless punk *** like you every week. You're not an Iowa fan, that's for sure. But I'll do whatever it takes to beat your pathetic nonsense into the ground. Settle in, retard. I'll destroy you like I did on the last board.
I said part of last season's decline on D was due to concessions that had to be made, at a program level, for the purpose off installing a new offense.So you never said the defense wasn't getting the same emphasis in practice because a new offense was being installed?
I ignored you because I knew it bothered you, specifically. Anytime I know you're suffering is a good thing. I always was able to easily deconstruct the garbage you posted, along with everyone else, actually. Calling out your unethical, often contradicting, nonsense is one of the board's longest standing past times.The only thing you did on the last board was embarrass yourself by losing your mind a few times, like you just did here, and claimed to have blocked me, but chose rather to continue to complain about having to read my posts, like you just did here.
As for this board, from the jump you announced to everyone that you were done interacting with me. But continued to post about me and respond to my posts through 3rd parties' posts, lmao. Glad to see you have manned up enough to interact with me directly.
Everyone can read that you amended your question after not liking the answer I gave to your actual question.
Again, how is it that you arrive at me not being an Iowa fan? Do you have a answer for that, or is it just more name calling? It's different, that's for sure. Everyone else calls me a homer because I tend to give the benefit of the doubt to one of the most consistent football coaches of all time.
And you sure use the word "retard" a lot. Is that really necessary? I know I'm not the only one that's mentioned this to you
EmbarrassingI ignored you because I knew it bothered you, specifically. Anytime I know you're suffering is a good thing. I always was able to easily deconstruct the garbage you posted, along with everyone else, actually. Calling out your unethical, often contradicting, nonsense is one of the board's longest standing past times.
I finally decided to respond because all you do is lie and argue in bad faith. But like I said, settle in, I'll destroy you for as long as I have to in any thread. Can't wait to make you my ***** again. I just can't imagine being such a worthless loser that you actually derail a thread about another team's coach.
Again, more lies. Nothing was amended. I just had to explain it because you're openly acting retarded about a simple question. It's understanding the greater context of the situation. You either lied by saying you didn't understand what is being asked, or you're retarded. Now I've called you out on your garbage and now you have to lie more. Read better.
I just call them as I see them. You're a retard, through and through. But you target me because of how often I give you a spanking. Can't wait for your next post so I can spank you again, retard.
Just like it's embarrassing that I have to explain a question to you. Is it a valid question to ask if the loss of a head coach will affect Iowa, who is playing said team, and how this will possibly affect the outcome of the game this week? Of course it is. You just don't like that I posted. Admit it and we can all move on.Embarrassing
So what would those imaginary concessions have been?I said part of last season's decline on D was due to concessions that had to be made, at a program level, for the purpose off installing a new offense.
And you know darn well that your claims in posts #49 and #52 are quite different
I answered your question, you didn't have to explain anything.Just like it's embarrassing that I have to explain a question to you. Is it a valid question to ask if the loss of a head coach will affect Iowa, who is playing said team, and how this will possibly affect the outcome of the game this week? Of course it is. You just don't like that I posted. Admit it and we can all move on.
Not going to take the time repeating them so you can spend another year mischaracterizingSo what would those imaginary concessions have been?
You sure about that? All the question marks in your original post say otherwise, dumbass. It sounds as though you knew what I meant by my question, but you were upset that I asked it. Maybe it's time to grow up? Or just not respond at all?I answered your question, you didn't have to explain anything.
If yours was a valid question, then mine most certainly was a valid answer.
Do you honestly think anyone is going to say the changes increase PSU's chances of winning? It's a poser-*** question that was given an honest and relevant answer
The question marks were from not understanding the reason for your question.You sure about that? All the question marks in your original post say otherwise, dumbass. It sounds as though you knew what I meant by my question, but you were upset that I asked it. Maybe it's time to grow up? Or just not respond at all?
This is a thread about the loss of Franklin, it also happens to be the week Iowa plays them. It's a legitimate question that anyone who is an Iowa fan, media member, or even a fan of football will be thinking about. And yes, I have seen people say this may actually give Penn State a little confidence now that the root of the problem has been removed from the team. It only took me calling you out to actually answer it honestly. Which is sad, but not unexpected.
Never said I did, you idiot. The question is meant to bring the firing of Franklin back to an Iowa centric topic, which is the upcoming game. Penn State is a more talented team than us, on nearly every level. But the program is spiraling, they lost their HC, and their QB is out for the year. Now, a game that was seen as a likely loss, is looking more and more like something Iowa can win. It's an important and relevant question to ask. The reasoning is clear and obvious. Stop getting so upset that people you don't like ask a question.The question marks were from not understanding the reason for your question.
Do you, at all, believe PSU's chances to win have increased?
So someone repeating what you say is mischaracterizing? Are you Al Gore?Not going to take the time repeating them so you can spend another year mischaracterizing
It was a question. Read better.Never said I did, you idiot. The question is meant to bring the firing of Franklin back to an Iowa centric topic, which is the upcoming game. Penn State is a more talented team than us, on nearly every level. But the program is spiraling, they lost their HC, and their QB is out for the year. Now, a game that was seen as a likely loss, is looking more and more like something Iowa can win. It's an important and relevant question to ask. The reasoning is clear and obvious. Stop getting so upset that people you don't like ask a question.
I've called you out, pretty much every time you've done it, for almost a year straight. So, read better.So someone repeating what you say is mischaracterizing? Are you Al Gore?
Read better, I answered your question in my previous post. The question is something posed to the entire forum for them to discuss, along with commenting on the firing of Franklin. Do you not understand what a forum is? A discussion thread? Are you confirming your old nickname is as true as everyone knows it is? Again, time to grow up.It was a question. Read better.
I'll ask it again. Do you, at all believe PSU's chances of winning have increased?
It seems you have answered that in your latest post. "An Iowa loss looking more and more like a possible win." No ****
Again, educate us on what concessions were made in practice last season. Surely you were there, right? I mean it couldn't have been that those 6th year guys weren't really as great as everyone promoted them to be? Like Castro getting smoked by ISU to lose the game?I've called you out, pretty much every time you've done it, for almost a year straight. So, read better.
And yeah, I've pretty much lost faith in your comprehension level at this point
Now, what does this mean for Iowa next Saturday? Ped State is now without a head coach or their starting QB.
Now, what does this mean for Iowa next Saturday? Ped State is now without a head coach or their starting QB.
I'm sorry, maybe my reading ability is poor. But can you please direct me to the material that answers my question?Read better, I answered your question in my previous post. The question is something posed to the entire forum for them to discuss, along with commenting on the firing of Franklin. Do you not understand what a forum is? A discussion thread? Are you confirming your old nickname is as true as everyone knows it is? Again, time to grow up.
Pick a better word. I'm not quoting the plethora of posts you've made in this thread because there's no reason to repeat it. Take your own advice and grow up as well.Read better, I answered your question in my previous post. The question is something posed to the entire forum for them to discuss, along with commenting on the firing of Franklin. Do you not understand what a forum is? A discussion thread? Are you confirming your old nickname is as true as everyone knows it is? Again, time to grow up.
Holy **** that'd be hilarious.its going to be Rhule they hire right? Isn't he bff with the AD?
I've already told you you aren't worth the time.Again, educate us on what concessions were made in practice last season. Surely you were there, right? I mean it couldn't have been that those 6th year guys weren't really as great as everyone promoted them to be? Like Castro getting smoked by ISU to lose the game?
It is. Thank you for acknowledging it.I'm sorry, maybe my reading ability is poor.
But can you please direct me to the material that answers my question?
I'll repeat it again. Do you, at all, believe PSU's chances of winning have increased?
Eyes of Retard, of course!Old nickname?
The AD and Rhule are buddies and have a working history.Holy **** that'd be hilarious.