Jamal Murray

PL

Redshirt
Dec 3, 2006
949
7
0
Will Jamal Murray ever be put in the 2015 Rivals rankings? Thon Maker isn't even in 2015 anymore and he is still ranked.
 

akaukswoosh

Hall of Famer
Jan 14, 2006
80,473
123,460
93
Current rakings: Last updated on 5/13/14
I'd say he'll have a prominent spot in the final rankings.
 

Fadhi

All-Conference
Jan 11, 2013
907
1,293
0
I would top 5. He is the most mentally advanced (in terms of how to play the game of basketball) player in the class.

The fact that we have him along with two other point guards is almost silly
 

Son_Of_Saul

Heisman
Dec 7, 2007
45,128
97,975
113
What a sad state of recruiting. Three top 10 guys (including arguably the top freshman) a JUCO-All-American and an incarnation of DeAndre Liggins with a better jump shot? What the hell is happening, Cal?!?!
 

Son_Of_Saul

Heisman
Dec 7, 2007
45,128
97,975
113
I don't think Top Five is realistic. I'd say Top Six. Maybe Top Seven.

Probably true, but only because the guys ahead of him project as more NBA-impactful due to their athleticism and length (Brown, Ingram, Skal, Simmons). I think Murray has a top 5 freshman impact on the college game next year. He's a late bloomer for the most part, and guys like Newman will come in ranked higher because they're more recognized and have been legitimized for a longer period of time. I expect Murray to dominate the discussion over the other freshman guards come March, and more importantly for him, come June.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kentucky_wildcat_#1

UKallDay

Senior
Dec 15, 2006
3,779
489
0
After Skal and Ben Simmons, there are no other players in this class I would take over Jamal Murray. Have seen most of the top 30 guys play a decent amount, and Murray is in the top 3. The kid gets buckets from all over the floor. He's like a sick Archie Goodwin/Devin Booker/Drake hybrid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Panthur
Mar 13, 2004
14,745
12,925
0
ESPN is also slow to the punch. They haven't made the update either.

ESPN, though, does give him a 92 grade which would put him at 12 or 13 in their rankings. Zimmerman is currently 12th with a 92 grade, one spot ahead of Briscoe. Murray is 10th by 24/7 and the 24/7 national composite. 12th by Scout. Seems most services are putting him around the same spot, 10-12.
 

KyFord

Senior
Sep 21, 2006
863
624
0
It's funny that Yahoo and ESPN haven't updated the rankings yet continue to post articles about Duke's recruiting dominance. If they update the rankings then Jamal Murray puts us at #1 IMO.
 

BigKari

All-American
Apr 15, 2014
5,062
9,549
53
After Skal and Ben Simmons, there are no other players in this class I would take over Jamal Murray. Have seen most of the top 30 guys play a decent amount, and Murray is in the top 3. The kid gets buckets from all over the floor. He's like a sick Archie Goodwin/Devin Booker/Drake hybrid.

Who is Drake?
 

Hoskins91_rivals

All-Conference
Jun 12, 2011
6,750
1,619
50
It's funny that Yahoo and ESPN haven't updated the rankings yet continue to post articles about Duke's recruiting dominance. If they update the rankings then Jamal Murray puts us at #1 IMO.
Duke's lowest recruit on rsci is 21, so probably not.
 

LineSkiCat

Sophomore
Nov 28, 2011
5,300
163
0
It's funny that Yahoo and ESPN haven't updated the rankings yet continue to post articles about Duke's recruiting dominance. If they update the rankings then Jamal Murray puts us at #1 IMO.

In a composite rating, we wouldn't quite top Duke. Like the guy above said about Kennard being 21. Matthews, our 4th recruit is down in the 30's-40's. Otherwise, top3 compared (Skal, Briscoe, Murray/Thornton, Jeter, Ingram) would give us the edge. Give me our 3 any day, with Skal having the highest ceiling and an absolute show stopper. Thornton and Jeter? I see them as 2 year guys, maybe 3 if they get recruited over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

Rhavic

Heisman
Dec 15, 2014
33,319
23,526
68
I'm glad I'm not the only one here who thought Jeter was very overrated. I can't see a single transcendent skill that he possesses, and it certainly doesn't look like he does a lot of everything very well.
 

wcc31

Heisman
Mar 18, 2002
26,929
88,372
98
My opinion:

1. Labissiere
2. Simmons
3. Ingram
4. Murray
5. Brown

I understand Ingram's longterm potential, but think he'll struggle with the physicality of college much like Tayshaun and Justin Jackson. He'll be good, but I don't see a freshman star- especially if K plays him at PF. Give me Murray over him all day.
 

PL

Redshirt
Dec 3, 2006
949
7
0
uk_fan_02 composite rankings (composition of all the rankings I've done in my head)

1. Labissiere
2. Simmons
3. Ingram
4. Diallo
5. Brown
6. Murray
7. Newman
8. Rabb
9. Briscoe
10. Stone
 

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
I understand Ingram's longterm potential, but think he'll struggle with the physicality of college much like Tayshaun and Justin Jackson. He'll be good, but I don't see a freshman star- especially if K plays him at PF. Give me Murray over him all day.

Ingram is a perfect 4 in Duke's system. I think he will flourish. He might struggle initially, especially on the defensive end, but ultimately he will be a stud, IMHO.
 

wcc31

Heisman
Mar 18, 2002
26,929
88,372
98
Ingram is a perfect 4 in Duke's system. I think he will flourish. He might struggle initially, especially on the defensive end, but ultimately he will be a stud, IMHO.

Disagree. He'll get pushed around and won't be able to check anyone. There's a reason these really skinny lengthy frontcourt guys rarely set the world on fire right away.
 

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
Disagree. He'll get pushed around and won't be able to check anyone. There's a reason these really skinny lengthy frontcourt guys rarely set the world on fire right away.

On defense, maybe.

Offesnively, he will do fine. Duke won't post him up much. He's a perimeter player.
 

kyblue22

Senior
Mar 6, 2007
35,947
887
0
uk_fan_02 composite rankings (composition of all the rankings I've done in my head)

1. Labissiere
2. Simmons
3. Ingram
4. Diallo
5. Brown
6. Murray
7. Newman
8. Rabb
9. Briscoe
10. Stone

You are putting Briscoe to low should be 7.
 

BlueBlood66_rivals34314

All-Conference
Aug 2, 2012
3,469
1,233
0
Yep. Same thing with Justin Jackson last year.

Ingram is a little more athletic, a little taller, and a lot more aggressive than Jackson. I do think he will have his struggles early on but once he finds his groove he is going to be a stud.

Justin Jackson is the kind of kid you let take your daughter out and tell him it's okay if they're out past curfew because you know nothing is going to happen.
 

wcc31

Heisman
Mar 18, 2002
26,929
88,372
98
Ingram is a little more athletic, a little taller, and a lot more aggressive than Jackson. I do think he will have his struggles early on but once he finds his groove he is going to be a stud.

Justin Jackson is the kind of kid you let take your daughter out and tell him it's okay if they're out past curfew because you know nothing is going to happen.

I'm not saying they're the same exact player. I'm saying they'll have similar issues. Name me a super-slight forward who took CBB by storm? Guess we'll have to wait and see.
 

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
I'm not saying they're the same exact player. I'm saying they'll have similar issues. Name me a super-slight forward who took CBB by storm? Guess we'll have to wait and see.

Just based on your description, Anthony Davis comes to mind.

Not saying Ingram is Davis, just that Davis was said to be too skinny coming out of HS by a lot of people on this board.

He turned out to be pretty good.
 

wcc31

Heisman
Mar 18, 2002
26,929
88,372
98
Just based on your description, Anthony Davis comes to mind.

Not saying Ingram is Davis, just that Davis was said to be too skinny coming out of HS by a lot of people on this board.

He turned out to be pretty good.

Yeah, the best player of his generation, and Davis actually had some shoulders and legs on him. Strong comparison!

People also expected John Henson to be a stud right off the bat- yet another example.
 

LineSkiCat

Sophomore
Nov 28, 2011
5,300
163
0
AD23 is not only a once-in-a-decade talent, he might be a once-in-a-lifetime basketball specimen. He was a guard in a big man's body who developed the post moves and somehow retained almost all of his guard abilities.

Can't compare a skinny SF to him. Actually, I think it's safe to say there is no longer a comparison to Davis. The combination of late growth spurt, transition from a 1 to a 5, and basketball IQ just won't happen again for years, maybe ever. He's his own Half-man Half-God basketball creature.
 

Stonewall12

Heisman
Nov 15, 2009
24,517
13,388
66
I'm not saying they're the same exact player. I'm saying they'll have similar issues. Name me a super-slight forward who took CBB by storm? Guess we'll have to wait and see.
I agree with your point Chad. The only one I can think of offhand is Durant.
 

GonzoCat90

Heisman
Mar 30, 2009
32,377
34,559
0
I'm not saying they're the same exact player. I'm saying they'll have similar issues. Name me a super-slight forward who took CBB by storm? Guess we'll have to wait and see.

Aside from Davis and Durant, you'd definitely have to stretch the definition of "by storm" to include guys like Hakim Warrick, Josh Childress, Julius Hodge, Ronnie and Corey Brewer, and both Zellers in the last 10 years, and virtually none of those guys did it as freshmen.