Chances are he won’t come, but you should always shoot your shot before going for realistic options. Problem is, Mitch Barnhart went from Scott Drew and Hurley to freaking Pope without ever going after guys like Ozelberger or Lloyd. Just complete laziness.
I actually think it's far more likely than Hurley, Lloyd, McCasland, and even Donovan.
For a multitude of reasons, I believe Scott Drew had told Mitch he would take the Kentucky job well in advance of Calipari leaving. Then when the time came, Scott couldn't/wouldn't do it. We actually lucked out getting Pope instead of Drew. I'm not certain of why Baylor has fallen off, but I question how much has to do with Alvin Brooks III leaving.
Mitch panicked. Hurley was never going to say yes. And I said that all along. The problem with Hurley was we had nothing to offer him. UCONN has forced itself into the blue blood conversation. He had everything he needed to win at the highest level (FFS, he was coming off of back to back national championships). And people love to say "GIVE HIM ALL THE MONEY. MAKE AN OFFER HE CAN'T SAY NO TO." But, when you already make a ton of money, or you can make a ton of money staying where you prefer to be--more of it isn't that great of a selling point. I get it. 12 million is a TON of money. But if you WANT to be at UCONN, and they're giving you 8 million--is your life THAT much better with another 4 million? To the point you'd give up your established and already happy life? I also don't think Hurley wanted to deal with Mitch. Hurley is a far bigger A-hole than Cal. And Cal couldn't get along with Mitch.
KSR has said over and over that a lot of the "good" candidates couldn't get past the board. I believe that's probably the case. But it's stupid, if so. We're not running a church or teaching ethics. Nate Oats hasn't done anything THAT bad. Pearl had some previous NCAA violations that wouldn't be violations. I don't even begin to understand why we didn't go after Otzelberger.
The new AD needs to have feelers out through back channels knowing who would truly be open to interviewing and taking the job. If the feedback isn't positive, don't waste time.
But assuming they're open to it, I'd cast a net that includes:
Golden
Oats
May
Oztelberger
I honestly don't think Pearl, Lloyd, McCasland, or Donovan are in play. I'm not against checking on them. Keep in mind, Bruce is 66 years old this month. Donovan is 60. You don't have a long tenure with either. And I think there's a ton of value in getting a coach 10+ years younger.
If Pearl had the desire to coach, he'd have a top 10 team at Auburn right now. I know they've struggled, but they have very talented basketball players. Bruce Pearl would do a lot better than nepotism hire Steven Pearl. We kind of went through the "Can Kentucky get Jay Wright?!" We couldn't.
Lloyd is a West coast guy. He's competing at Arizona.
McCasland is a Texas guy. He's doing very well at a Texas school. Maybe he'd move up to the University of Texas. But given his connections and history in Texas schools, I worry he's not looking to leave the state.
Donovan wants to be in the NBA. Donovan could have easily communicated his desire to take the Kentucky job during the coaching search.
People keep saying "Make them say no." "Make them an offer they can't refuse." I think the only offer Billy Donovan "can't refuse" involves an NBA job. McCasland involves a Texas job. Lloyd involves a West Coast job.