Jacob Young Article

hiwater

All-Conference
Aug 1, 2001
9,569
3,123
113
Apparently, like Johnson and Mathis, he doesn’t want to. It would be a kick in the teeth if he plays college ball elsewhere.
Just like the kick in the teeth that he got by being benched ahead of players that struggled more than he did. When you are in what you thought was going to be your last year and you have Pro asperations, being given singled out for such a long stretch of the season hurts. Despite his turnovers in those couple of games (ONE GAME IN PARTICULAR) , he was our most productive guard at both ends of the court.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUsojo

nukem

All-Conference
Feb 3, 2003
2,153
4,736
113
Just like the kick in the teeth that he got by being benched ahead of players that struggled more than he did. When you are in what you thought was going to be your last year and you have Pro asperations, being given singled out for such a long stretch of the season hurts. Despite his turnovers in those couple of games (ONE GAME IN PARTICULAR) , he was our most productive guard at both ends of the court.

When you say he got benched that's not technically true considering he played 30.1 minutes per game which was only behind Harper at 32.0 and Baker at 31.2. The next closest guy was Mulcahey at 27.3. So him being in the top 3 of minutes per game is a better characterization of his playing time. Not whether he actually started a game or not. Maybe he didn't like how Pike utilized him or Pike's substitution patterns, but to say he was benched when he was at the top of minutes per game on this team is a stretch.

Now if you want to tell me Mathis got benched, I could buy that. He only played 21.2 minutes per game. But I think that topic has been beaten to death.
 

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,477
16,325
113
Just like the kick in the teeth that he got by being benched ahead of players that struggled more than he did. When you are in what you thought was going to be your last year and you have Pro asperations, being given singled out for such a long stretch of the season hurts. Despite his turnovers in those couple of games (ONE GAME IN PARTICULAR) , he was our most productive guard at both ends of the court.
Pike is definitely a player’s coach so I give him the benefit of the doubt when he actually does bench a player. Most coaches would have benched some of our players long before Pike did. I agree with you that Young was the most productive guard but he would also make some of the most head-scratching plays on the team, and usually in bunches. I just think he is a high-energy skilled guard who had trouble disciplining his own energy when it was necessary. As far a benching goes, my only complaint this year was that Geo and Mathis weren’t benched enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hiwater

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,856
25,542
113
Apparently, like Johnson and Mathis, he doesn’t want to. It would be a kick in the teeth if he plays college ball elsewhere.
I agree.... perfectly willing to accept the idea of him going to Europe or somewhere for pro ball.....this would sting and indicate he was not happy here.....

edit:... the article did seem like pure speculation and did not indicate that Young was interested
 

RUSwagger

All-Conference
Dec 2, 2019
573
1,049
0
He has spoken about wanting to get his MBA. It makes sense that he may seek the best basketball/MBA program balance.
 

hiwater

All-Conference
Aug 1, 2001
9,569
3,123
113
Pike is definitely a player’s coach so I give him the benefit of the doubt when he actually does bench a player. Most coaches would have benched some of our players long before Pike did. I agree with you that Young was the most productive guard but he would also make some of the most head-scratching plays on the team, and usually in bunches. I just think he is a high-energy skilled guard who had trouble disciplining his own energy when it was necessary. As far a benching goes, my only complaint this year was that Geo and Mathis weren’t benched enough.
I would add Harper to that too. He was great in the tourny, but there were too many times that he did not hustle on D during the season as well as just not contributing on O.
 

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,477
16,325
113
I would add Harper to that too. He was great in the tourny, but there were too many times that he did not hustle on D during the season as well as just not contributing on O.
Good point. I thought maybe he was just badly out of shape after his injury.
 

RUsojo

Heisman
Dec 17, 2010
29,438
28,582
113
When you say he got benched that's not technically true considering he played 30.1 minutes per game which was only behind Harper at 32.0 and Baker at 31.2. The next closest guy was Mulcahey at 27.3. So him being in the top 3 of minutes per game is a better characterization of his playing time. Not whether he actually started a game or not. Maybe he didn't like how Pike utilized him or Pike's substitution patterns, but to say he was benched when he was at the top of minutes per game on this team is a stretch.

Now if you want to tell me Mathis got benched, I could buy that. He only played 21.2 minutes per game. But I think that topic has been beaten to death.
He did get pulled from the starting lineup.

I know Pike has repeatedly stated he doesn’t care who starts. And obviously, playing more minutes regardless of starting is very important. But, let’s be honest, the kids care who starts. It’s always been that way and always will be. And this decision had an impact on the team for sure.

We will see if Pikiell continues not caring who starts or if he starts to consider it more as it relates to roster management.