Toggle sidebar

J6

dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,892
21,121
113
TigerGrowls said:


🚨 BREAKING: New J6 Bombshell Exposes “Ghost Bus” Fed Operation — Surveillance Footage CONFIRMS It All 🚨

🔥 Newly released Capitol Police surveillance cam #0903 — Jan 6, 5:18 A.M. —
CONFIRMS the arrival of the all-white “Ghost Bus” escorted to the Capitol, packed with FBI informants, CHS, and undercover agitators dressed as Trump supporters.
🎥 Pelosi’s own official Jan 6 footage shows the camera tracking the vehicle as it arrives under police escort, hours before the chaos began.

AND IT GETS WORSE ⬇️

📱 Cell phone footage from that same day captures a D.C. officer admitting:

“We go undercover as Antifa in the crowd.”

🚌 FOUR unmarked, unnumbered FBI shuttle buses were seen arriving early that morning — now CONFIRMED by GOP Rep. Clay Higgins in sworn testimony before Congress.

🎙️ Rep. Higgins asked FBI Director Wray POINT-BLANK if the Bureau sent informants disguised as Trump supporters to stage the event.
Democrats immediately tried to cut his mic.

💣 Video also shows rows of propane tanks & stacks of 2x4s mysteriously placed outside the Capitol — staged weapons?
Who put them there? Who knew? Who gave the order?
📢 This is the most damning evidence yet that J6 was not an organic riot — it was a Fed-surrection.

This wasn’t about justice —
It was a setup to smear Trump, silence patriots, and give the Deep State its next weapon: political persecution.
🧩 The pieces are all coming together:

Surveillance tapes ✅

Undercover admissions ✅
Staged weapons ✅

Congressional confirmation ✅

NO accountability ❌

🗣️ We The People DEMAND the full release of all 14,000+ hours of Jan 6 footage.
We demand transparency. We demand the truth.
Click to expand...

No, the claim of "ghost buses" filled with FBI informants dressed as Trump supporters on January 6, 2021, has not been proven.The theory, primarily pushed by Rep. Clay Higgins during a 2023 House hearing, alleges that unmarked white buses transported FBI operatives to incite the Capitol riot. However, multiple sources, including FBI Director Christopher Wray, have explicitly denied any FBI operation orchestrating the violence, with Wray stating, “If you are asking whether the violence at the Capitol on January 6 was part of some operation orchestrated by FBI sources or agents, the answer is emphatically no.”

Higgins cited a photo of two white buses at Union Station as evidence, claiming they were "nefarious" and carried informants. No credible evidence has been presented to substantiate this. Investigations, including the House Select Committee on January 6 and federal cases involving over 1,200 defendants, found the attack was driven by Trump supporters motivated by false election fraud claims, not FBI operatives. Experts note the term "ghost bus" is unfamiliar in law enforcement, and the scenario of busing informants is logistically implausible.

Recent X posts, like one from @ProjectConstitution on August 4, 2025, claim Capitol Police footage at 5:18 A.M. confirms a "ghost bus" with FBI operatives, but these remain unverified and lack corroboration from official sources. Without concrete evidence, the claim remains a conspiracy theory, debunked by extensive investigations.





 
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,884
32,848
113
dpic73 said:
No, the claim of "ghost buses" filled with FBI informants dressed as Trump supporters on January 6, 2021, has not been proven.The theory, primarily pushed by Rep. Clay Higgins during a 2023 House hearing, alleges that unmarked white buses transported FBI operatives to incite the Capitol riot. However, multiple sources, including FBI Director Christopher Wray, have explicitly denied any FBI operation orchestrating the violence, with Wray stating, “If you are asking whether the violence at the Capitol on January 6 was part of some operation orchestrated by FBI sources or agents, the answer is emphatically no.”

Higgins cited a photo of two white buses at Union Station as evidence, claiming they were "nefarious" and carried informants. No credible evidence has been presented to substantiate this. Investigations, including the House Select Committee on January 6 and federal cases involving over 1,200 defendants, found the attack was driven by Trump supporters motivated by false election fraud claims, not FBI operatives. Experts note the term "ghost bus" is unfamiliar in law enforcement, and the scenario of busing informants is logistically implausible.

Recent X posts, like one from @ProjectConstitution on August 4, 2025, claim Capitol Police footage at 5:18 A.M. confirms a "ghost bus" with FBI operatives, but these remain unverified and lack corroboration from official sources. Without concrete evidence, the claim remains a conspiracy theory, debunked by extensive investigations.
Click to expand...
Grok is a calculator with a big processor. Nothing g more.
 
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,892
21,121
113
TigerGrowls said:
Grok is a calculator with a big processor. Nothing g more.
Click to expand...
TRUMP is the ONLY person responsible for what happened on January 6th so it's time to come back to reality and accept the fact that the man you support more than our own country is a corrupt, treasonous sociopath, no matter how many conspiracies you concoct about people who had nothing to do with his gross criminality. Buses, Nancy nor the FBI had a damn thing to do with pathologically lying about the election and inviting his enraged hillybilly supporters to the capitol to illegally shut down the counting of the electoral votes. That was Donald, he did that all by himself. He's the criminal
 
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,884
32,848
113
Dis crazy yall.




Attorney Ed Martin says the January 6 Committee is in Deep **** — “Pam Bondi let us loose..” 👀

Q: They destroyed evidence.. is there criminality there?

Ed: Of course… we’re all in that too, and trust me, a-lot of people DID NOT get a pardon, and they ought to be keeping an eye on their mail-box.

Q: The pardons that were given, it was done by Auto-Pen. Are they legitimate?

Ed: I’m the pardon attorney. I’m investigating how they were given. This is like nothing we’ve seen in history. Pam Bondi let us loose… and when this comes out, it will take their hoaxes down.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,884
32,848
113


This should make you furious

Judge who sentenced January 6 prisoners only allowed doctored video to present the narratives they wanted

January 6th prisoner spent 4 years in prison designated as a domestic terrorist because he was trying to save a women’s life. Police footage showed due to the crowd he fell on an officer, the officer saw he was just trying to save a life, so the officer helped him up and thanked him

The judge only allowed an edited video where they removed the audio to frame it as if he was fighting with the officer

The judge then didn’t allow testimony or the original video

They rigged the court hearings to only preset the narrative they wanted, not what actually happened
 
  • Angry
Reactions: ANEW and Allornothing
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,884
32,848
113
BOMBSHELL!!! The lies are being exposed.


Jeremy Bertino, once the centerpiece of the prosecution’s case, has now signed an affidavit revealing how federal prosecutors coached, pressured, and manipulated him into testifying the way they wanted.


BREAKING: Biden DOJ’s Star J6 Witness Recants


A key witness used by @JoeBiden’s DOJ to secure “seditious conspiracy” convictions against the Proud Boys has officially recanted.


Jeremy Bertino, once the centerpiece of the prosecution’s case, has now signed an affidavit revealing how federal prosecutors coached, pressured, and manipulated him into testifying the way they wanted.


This was never about justice. It was about the Biden regime weaponizing @TheJusticeDept to crush political opponents and send a message to anyone who dared challenge them.


Bertino was not even at the Capitol on January 6. Yet his coerced testimony was used to lock away men like Enrique Tarrio for decades.


The truth is coming out and it exposes one of the most corrupt political prosecutions in American history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,892
21,121
113
TigerGrowls said:
@dpic73

Us conspiracy theorists are undefeated.

Click to expand...

Magas are so dumb, so gullible and will do or say anything to whitewash one of the worst days in our history, triggered by the worst human being ever elected to any office. DJT is the ONLY reason this happened, no one else.


"No, the FBI did not send 274 agents to the Capitol on January 6, 2021, in the sense implied by the viral claim—that is, as undercover operatives embedded in the crowds to instigate or participate in the riot. This narrative stems from a misrepresentation of a newly disclosed internal FBI after-action report, which tallies a total personnel count of 274 across all FBI activities that day. These included:
  • Responding to pipe bombs near the Republican and Democratic National Committee headquarters.
  • Investigating a suspicious truck believed to contain explosives.
  • Assisting U.S. Capitol Police and other law enforcement on the grounds and inside the Capitol after the breach.
  • General coordination from command posts and intelligence sharing.
The report does not indicate these agents were "sent to" or embedded in the crowds as provocateurs. Many were in uniform or tactical gear, deployed reactively as violence escalated, and the operation was described as disorganized, leading to internal frustrations about being treated as "political pawns" due to perceived liberal bias and overreach in post-riot investigations (e.g., pursuing misdemeanor cases aggressively).'

Key Facts on FBI Presence
A December 2024 Justice Department Inspector General (OIG) report—based on a comprehensive review of FBI records, interviews, and testimony—provides the most authoritative breakdown:
  • No undercover FBI employees were present in the protest crowds or at the Capitol. FBI policy prohibits undercover agents at First Amendment-protected events without specific investigative authority, and a request for such was denied.
  • 26 confidential human sources (informants) were in Washington, D.C., that day:
    • 3 were tasked by FBI field offices to monitor specific domestic terrorism suspects potentially attending events (1 entered the Capitol; the others stayed outside).
    • 23 attended on their own initiative.
    • Of the 26: 4 entered the Capitol, 13 entered the restricted perimeter around it, and 9 neither entered restricted areas nor engaged in illegal activity.
  • None were authorized to break the law, enter restricted areas, or encourage others to do so. Some proactively reported crimes during the riot.
  • No informants have been prosecuted, consistent with DOJ policy not charging simple trespass (hundreds of non-informants were also not charged for that alone).
Context and Debunking the Claim
  • The "274 agents" figure comes from the after-action report, obtained by new FBI Director Kash Patel and shared with Congress on September 25, 2025. It fueled "FEDSURRECTION" memes on X, but conflates response personnel with undercover instigators. Earlier claims (e.g., Rep. Clay Higgins alleging "over 200 FBI assets" dressed as Trump supporters) have been repeatedly debunked as lacking evidence.
  • The OIG criticized the FBI for not doing enough pre-event intelligence (e.g., failing to canvass all field offices for informant tips), which could have better prepared law enforcement. However, it praised the FBI's surge of resources after the breach to secure the Capitol and pursue over 1,500 arrests.
  • Separate from the FBI, Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) undercover officers were in crowds (admitted in court docs), and some defense attorneys allege they encouraged protesters (e.g., helping climb barriers). This is distinct from FBI actions.
  • Conspiracy theories alleging FBI orchestration (e.g., "ghost buses" of agents) persist among Trump allies but lack substantiation. FBI Director Christopher Wray has called them "ludicrous," and no credible evidence supports agents inciting violence.
In short, the FBI's role was supportive and reactive, not provocative. The 274 figure reflects a chaotic all-hands response to an unfolding crisis, not a setup. For full details, see the OIG report or the after-action document via House Judiciary Committee releases.

 
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,884
32,848
113
dpic73 said:
Magas are so dumb, so gullible and will do or say anything to whitewash one of the worst days in our history, triggered by the worst human being ever elected to any office. DJT is the ONLY reason this happened, no one else.


"No, the FBI did not send 274 agents to the Capitol on January 6, 2021, in the sense implied by the viral claim—that is, as undercover operatives embedded in the crowds to instigate or participate in the riot. This narrative stems from a misrepresentation of a newly disclosed internal FBI after-action report, which tallies a total personnel count of 274 across all FBI activities that day. These included:
  • Responding to pipe bombs near the Republican and Democratic National Committee headquarters.
  • Investigating a suspicious truck believed to contain explosives.
  • Assisting U.S. Capitol Police and other law enforcement on the grounds and inside the Capitol after the breach.
  • General coordination from command posts and intelligence sharing.
The report does not indicate these agents were "sent to" or embedded in the crowds as provocateurs. Many were in uniform or tactical gear, deployed reactively as violence escalated, and the operation was described as disorganized, leading to internal frustrations about being treated as "political pawns" due to perceived liberal bias and overreach in post-riot investigations (e.g., pursuing misdemeanor cases aggressively).'

Key Facts on FBI Presence
A December 2024 Justice Department Inspector General (OIG) report—based on a comprehensive review of FBI records, interviews, and testimony—provides the most authoritative breakdown:
  • No undercover FBI employees were present in the protest crowds or at the Capitol. FBI policy prohibits undercover agents at First Amendment-protected events without specific investigative authority, and a request for such was denied.
  • 26 confidential human sources (informants) were in Washington, D.C., that day:
    • 3 were tasked by FBI field offices to monitor specific domestic terrorism suspects potentially attending events (1 entered the Capitol; the others stayed outside).
    • 23 attended on their own initiative.
    • Of the 26: 4 entered the Capitol, 13 entered the restricted perimeter around it, and 9 neither entered restricted areas nor engaged in illegal activity.
  • None were authorized to break the law, enter restricted areas, or encourage others to do so. Some proactively reported crimes during the riot.
  • No informants have been prosecuted, consistent with DOJ policy not charging simple trespass (hundreds of non-informants were also not charged for that alone).
Context and Debunking the Claim
  • The "274 agents" figure comes from the after-action report, obtained by new FBI Director Kash Patel and shared with Congress on September 25, 2025. It fueled "FEDSURRECTION" memes on X, but conflates response personnel with undercover instigators. Earlier claims (e.g., Rep. Clay Higgins alleging "over 200 FBI assets" dressed as Trump supporters) have been repeatedly debunked as lacking evidence.
  • The OIG criticized the FBI for not doing enough pre-event intelligence (e.g., failing to canvass all field offices for informant tips), which could have better prepared law enforcement. However, it praised the FBI's surge of resources after the breach to secure the Capitol and pursue over 1,500 arrests.
  • Separate from the FBI, Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) undercover officers were in crowds (admitted in court docs), and some defense attorneys allege they encouraged protesters (e.g., helping climb barriers). This is distinct from FBI actions.
  • Conspiracy theories alleging FBI orchestration (e.g., "ghost buses" of agents) persist among Trump allies but lack substantiation. FBI Director Christopher Wray has called them "ludicrous," and no credible evidence supports agents inciting violence.
In short, the FBI's role was supportive and reactive, not provocative. The 274 figure reflects a chaotic all-hands response to an unfolding crisis, not a setup. For full details, see the OIG report or the after-action document via House Judiciary Committee releases.

Click to expand...
Dpic using grok to print half truths is unbecoming. This is new information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing and MTTiger19
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,892
21,121
113
TigerGrowls said:
Dpic using grok to print half truths is unbecoming. This is new information.
Click to expand...
TigerGrowls spreading misinformation in an attempt to absolve himself of the guilt he feels for supporting a democracy hating dictator who has made us the world's laughing stock.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TigerGrowls
MTTiger19

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
5,368
8,462
113
Imagine that, almost 300 feds stoking the crowd. Wasn’t this the theory from the right all along. Someone post the conspiracy graphic with all the other shenanigans the left has pulled in the last 5 years. Russia, covid, BLM, Floyd, now J6. Unbelievable what they’re willing to do to impose their beliefs.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Allornothing and dpic73
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,892
21,121
113
TigerGrowls said:
Click to expand...




 
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,892
21,121
113
MTTiger19 said:
Imagine that, almost 300 feds stoking the crowd. Wasn’t this the theory from the right all along. Someone post the conspiracy graphic with all the other shenanigans the left has pulled in the last 5 years. Russia, covid, BLM, Floyd, now J6. Unbelievable what they’re willing to do to impose their beliefs.
Click to expand...
That's your fabricated version that doesn't match the reality but I always find it rich that you gullible enablers of corruption find it wrong that there may have been law enforcement in the crowd of one of the most criminal events in our history. It's never the pathologically lying, election denying tyrant who invited them there's fault, it's always someone else.
 
MTTiger19

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
5,368
8,462
113
dpic73 said:
Magas are so dumb, so gullible and will do or say anything to whitewash one of the worst days in our history, triggered by the worst human being ever elected to any office. DJT is the ONLY reason this happened, no one else.


"No, the FBI did not send 274 agents to the Capitol on January 6, 2021, in the sense implied by the viral claim—that is, as undercover operatives embedded in the crowds to instigate or participate in the riot. This narrative stems from a misrepresentation of a newly disclosed internal FBI after-action report, which tallies a total personnel count of 274 across all FBI activities that day. These included:
  • Responding to pipe bombs near the Republican and Democratic National Committee headquarters.
  • Investigating a suspicious truck believed to contain explosives.
  • Assisting U.S. Capitol Police and other law enforcement on the grounds and inside the Capitol after the breach.
  • General coordination from command posts and intelligence sharing.
The report does not indicate these agents were "sent to" or embedded in the crowds as provocateurs. Many were in uniform or tactical gear, deployed reactively as violence escalated, and the operation was described as disorganized, leading to internal frustrations about being treated as "political pawns" due to perceived liberal bias and overreach in post-riot investigations (e.g., pursuing misdemeanor cases aggressively).'

Key Facts on FBI Presence
A December 2024 Justice Department Inspector General (OIG) report—based on a comprehensive review of FBI records, interviews, and testimony—provides the most authoritative breakdown:
  • No undercover FBI employees were present in the protest crowds or at the Capitol. FBI policy prohibits undercover agents at First Amendment-protected events without specific investigative authority, and a request for such was denied.
  • 26 confidential human sources (informants) were in Washington, D.C., that day:
    • 3 were tasked by FBI field offices to monitor specific domestic terrorism suspects potentially attending events (1 entered the Capitol; the others stayed outside).
    • 23 attended on their own initiative.
    • Of the 26: 4 entered the Capitol, 13 entered the restricted perimeter around it, and 9 neither entered restricted areas nor engaged in illegal activity.
  • None were authorized to break the law, enter restricted areas, or encourage others to do so. Some proactively reported crimes during the riot.
  • No informants have been prosecuted, consistent with DOJ policy not charging simple trespass (hundreds of non-informants were also not charged for that alone).
Context and Debunking the Claim
  • The "274 agents" figure comes from the after-action report, obtained by new FBI Director Kash Patel and shared with Congress on September 25, 2025. It fueled "FEDSURRECTION" memes on X, but conflates response personnel with undercover instigators. Earlier claims (e.g., Rep. Clay Higgins alleging "over 200 FBI assets" dressed as Trump supporters) have been repeatedly debunked as lacking evidence.
  • The OIG criticized the FBI for not doing enough pre-event intelligence (e.g., failing to canvass all field offices for informant tips), which could have better prepared law enforcement. However, it praised the FBI's surge of resources after the breach to secure the Capitol and pursue over 1,500 arrests.
  • Separate from the FBI, Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) undercover officers were in crowds (admitted in court docs), and some defense attorneys allege they encouraged protesters (e.g., helping climb barriers). This is distinct from FBI actions.
  • Conspiracy theories alleging FBI orchestration (e.g., "ghost buses" of agents) persist among Trump allies but lack substantiation. FBI Director Christopher Wray has called them "ludicrous," and no credible evidence supports agents inciting violence.
In short, the FBI's role was supportive and reactive, not provocative. The 274 figure reflects a chaotic all-hands response to an unfolding crisis, not a setup. For full details, see the OIG report or the after-action document via House Judiciary Committee releases.

Click to expand...
In short, the FBI's role was supportive and reactive, not provocative. The 274 figure reflects a chaotic all-hands response to an unfolding crisis, not a setup. For full details, see the OIG report or the after-action document via House Judiciary Committee releases.

Ahhh, interesting. They needed undercover FBI support for a “crisis” but not NG. Hmmm. When did the FBI become our riot police? Shouldn’t an insurrection be squashed by the NG, not plain clothes FBI agents. Didn’t Pelosi refuse the NG?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing and TigerGrowls
MTTiger19

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
5,368
8,462
113
dpic73 said:
That's your fabricated version that doesn't match the reality but I always find it rich that you gullible enablers of corruption find it wrong that there may have been law enforcement in the crowd of one of the most criminal events in our history. It's never the pathologically lying, election denying tyrant who invited them there's fault, it's always someone else.
Click to expand...
“pathologically lying, election denying tyrant”

“by the worst human being ever elected to any office. DJT is the ONLY reason this happened,”

It’s so funny to see how much DJT has spun you all into a frenzy. I can’t imagine allowing one person to impact my life like you all do with Trump. It’s pathetic. Go outside. Get laid. Find a hobby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing, AugTig and TigerGrowls
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,892
21,121
113
MTTiger19 said:
In short, the FBI's role was supportive and reactive, not provocative. The 274 figure reflects a chaotic all-hands response to an unfolding crisis, not a setup. For full details, see the OIG report or the after-action document via House Judiciary Committee releases.

Ahhh, interesting. They needed undercover FBI support for a “crisis” but not NG. Hmmm. When did the FBI become our riot police? Shouldn’t an insurrection be squashed by the NG, not plain clothes FBI agents. Didn’t Pelosi refuse the NG?
Click to expand...
I'm not going to engage in a back and forth with someone who places none of the blame on the pathologically lying dementia patient who created this event - but has a revolving door of never-ending conspiracies that attempts to blame anyone and everything except the perpetrator. We've heard these tired theories for almost five years now and none of them hold up to scrutiny, yet you keep peddling every new impossibly stupid conspiracy that comes down the line. This will never end until Trump is anointed sainthood for trying to overturn our democracy. It's absurd.
 
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,884
32,848
113


Keep in mind, @RealDonaldTrump was still the @POTUS


The question this begs is; was there sedition or conspiracy committed on the part of the DOJ & FBI at the time?


Who gave the orders?


When was this planned and who was part of the planning process?


You don’t just have 274 FBI agents or employees show up to execute this massive of a “fedsurrection.” This required foreknowledge (intent).


@AGPamBondi , @SusieWiles , @FBIDirectorKash get the names of every one and have them questioned under oath and put it all down on the infamous 302s!


J6 was not right and it was a set up and destroyed many families and lives. People committed suicide, others were murdered by federal officials and no one has been held accountable.


This was every bit an effort to take down @RealDonaldTrump


It was part of the coup, a coup that is still ongoing!!!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73 and Allornothing
TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,884
32,848
113


THIS IS:


Steven Sund, the Chief of Capitol Police who oversaw the entirety of January 6th,


@ChiefSund: “Ask yourself why the January 6 Committee never requested that I come in to publicly testify. Think about that—I am the Chief of Capitol Police.”


📝 A forensic exam confirms that convicted felons of the January 6 Committee deleted over 100 encrypted files just days before Republicans gained the majority.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom