It's clearly 25th Amendment time

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
33,196
8,449
113
I have far more concern for the youth in this country. Upwards of 50% believe positively regarding Socialism. They are by far, the most ignorant of history. Far worse than the last two. They have been indoctrinated into hating America, hating Capitalism, and fully believe 1619 lies and that America is a racist country.

See, the problem is, that sh&t makes a country lose their culture. When you lose your culture, you lose your country. When you're taught to hate your country, you lose your country.
Captain Houseboat: I believe positively regarding your retardation, as you are, by far, the most ignorant of history. (The folks at ASU have got to be shaking their heads at ever having admitted you.)
 

m.knox

All-Conference
Aug 20, 2003
2,675
2,691
113
Captain Houseboat: I believe positively regarding your retardation, as you are, by far, the most ignorant of history. (The folks at ASU have got to be shaking their heads at ever having admitted you.)

LOL..... Go down to the SF bath houses and blow off some steam....
 

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
33,196
8,449
113
Bear, all the military issued underwear have crotches included.
Good to hear that, but I'm guessing the Captain Houseboat shops elsewhere for his panties. Wonder if he has one of those ginormous bras that Kristi Noem's husband owned. Marty Feldman for days ...

 

Hotshoe

All-Conference
Feb 15, 2012
24,897
4,922
113
Good to hear that, but I'm guessing the Captain Houseboat shops elsewhere for his panties. Wonder if he has one of those ginormous bras that Kristi Noem's husband owned. Marty Feldman for days ...

This is why you're a pathetic hypocrite. You mock people's sexuality, yet claim to be a liberal. You're just like Schumer and the rest. Gutless hypocrites. You don't believe in a single thing you supposedly preach about. Quite the opposite, you mock it.

If you did this sh&t in the Castro District, you'd get your fat a$$ kicked by an LGBTQ person.

The real question is, why do you care so much about the sexuality of others? You're constantly mocking others for being gay. What if they are? Who fking cares? It's as stupid as your worn out gravel road and tomato comments. You're just a washed up pathetic ambulance chaser. You actually believe you're somebody. You're a nobody just like everyone else.
 

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
33,196
8,449
113
This is why you're a pathetic hypocrite. You mock people's sexuality, yet claim to be a liberal. You're just like Schumer and the rest. Gutless hypocrites. You don't believe in a single thing you supposedly preach about. Quite the opposite, you mock it.

If you did this sh&t in the Castro District, you'd get your fat a$$ kicked by an LGBTQ person.

The real question is, why do you care so much about the sexuality of others? You're constantly mocking others for being gay. What if they are? Who fking cares? It's as stupid as your worn out gravel road and tomato comments. You're just a washed up pathetic ambulance chaser. You actually believe you're somebody. You're a nobody just like everyone else.
Captain Houseboat, you WOUND me. I've never chased an ambulance in my life. I swear it. That's for personal injury attorneys. I'm an estate planning and probate attorney. If I was to chase a vehicle, it would more likely be a hearse.

It appears from your post that you have some familiarity with the Castro District. And possibly with having your a$$ kicked by an LGBTQ person. Was it a tranny? DAMN, those trannies!! That can't do that to my friend Captain Houseboat!
 

JohnHughsPartner

All-American
Nov 19, 2016
3,996
6,271
113
This is why you're a pathetic hypocrite. You mock people's sexuality, yet claim to be a liberal. You're just like Schumer and the rest. Gutless hypocrites. You don't believe in a single thing you supposedly preach about. Quite the opposite, you mock it.

If you did this sh&t in the Castro District, you'd get your fat a$$ kicked by an LGBTQ person.

The real question is, why do you care so much about the sexuality of others? You're constantly mocking others for being gay. What if they are? Who fking cares? It's as stupid as your worn out gravel road and tomato comments. You're just a washed up pathetic ambulance chaser. You actually believe you're somebody. You're a nobody just like everyone else.
“ ambulance chaser”
??
Was the ambulance full of cheeseburgers or dicks?
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,050
3,673
113
Captain Houseboat, you WOUND me. I've never chased an ambulance in my life. I swear it. That's for personal injury attorneys. I'm an estate planning and probate attorney. If I was to chase a vehicle, it would more likely be a hearse.

It appears from your post that you have some familiarity with the Castro District. And possibly with having your a$$ kicked by an LGBTQ person. Was it a tranny? DAMN, those trannies!! That can't do that to my friend Captain Houseboat!
I was going to ask you something, But I think I found the answer. I'm leaving my grandchildren a sizeable amount of money, and I was going to ask them to sign a contract that they would protect that money via a contract requiring a pre nup. I just read a story though about a Vanderbilt heir who had a similar contract. So I would assume that it's legal
 

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
33,196
8,449
113
I was going to ask you something, But I think I found the answer. I'm leaving my grandchildren a sizeable amount of money, and I was going to ask them to sign a contract that they would protect that money via a contract requiring a pre nup. I just read a story though about a Vanderbilt heir who had a similar contract. So I would assume that it's legal
I practice law in California, which is a community property state. You live in Florida, which is a common law state. Common law states are often referred to as "title holding states" by estate planning attorneys, because the mere form in which title is held is frequently determinative of: (i) how assets are divided up and allocated to the spouses in the event of a divorce; and (ii) the amount of freedom each spouse has in making testamentary dispositions (i.e., bequests) of such assets. By comparison, property held by a married resident of a community property state may be community property or quasi-community property notwithstanding that fact that it is held in the name of one spouse alone, and the characterization of spousal property as either community or separate has a profound impact on how it is divided upon divorce and distributed upon death of a spouse.

Moreover, although property received by one spouse via gift or inheritance is deemed to be that spouse's separate property, it is relatively easy to "transmute" (legalese for convert) separate property into community property. Depositing inherited money into a joint spousal bank account that also holds their salary income would transmute the inherited money from separate to community.

The bottom line is that a prenup or postnup is generally more useful (i.e. needed) in a community property state in order to preserve gifted or inherited assets from the claims of the recipient's spouse. But most common law states have "dower and curtesy" laws that provide some protection for surviving, non-title holding spouses. They vary from state to state. But, just as the operation of California's community and separate property laws can be varied by agreement of the spouses, my guess is that the relevant laws in a title holding jurisdiction like Florida can also be altered by agreement of the spouses.

While it is clear to me that your granddaughter and her future husband could enter into an enforceable prenup or postnup, it is not at all clear to me whether you could contractually bind your granddaughter to enter into a prenup or postnup at some future point as a condition precedent to receiving her gift or inheritance. Contracts pertaining to marriage and marriage rights generally receive closer scrutiny, and are occasionally deemed unenforceable on public policy grounds. It sounds like you have multiple grandchildren whom you would like to see enter into a future prenup. I think this is an occasion where you should seek the advice of a Florida attorney. And if a given child resides in some other state, then perhaps an attorney from that state as well. You should seek to minimize the application of any other state's laws by inserting a "Governing Law" clause in the trust agreement specifying that Florida law governs any disputes or legal actions concerning your trust.

You could put all of the money into a single "pot" trust for your grandchildren and structure that trust as a "discretionary" trust that gives the Trustee absolute discretion over whom to distribute to and how much to distribute. And then instruct that Trustee verbally as to your wishes concerning grandchild prenups, so that it would hopefully be taken into account by the Trustee when making later trust distributions, rather than risk putting express verbiage in the Trust agreement that might later be deemed unenforceable. But you had better be careful in selecting a Trustee. You would need to feel very confident that the Trustee will use his or her discretion in a way that carries out your testamentary intent.
 
Last edited:

Chumpsky

All-American
Oct 19, 2025
3,300
5,129
113
And just like that, you bring up the worst governor in America. What a good little sheep you are. Can you think for yourself? Only Newsom could take such a beautiful and wealthy state and create massive debt, horrible infrastructure, and the worst homeless problem in America. And yet, he's your champion. He cares, he cares so much for people. Meanwhile, while everyone is forced to be home, he's out partying with friends during Covid.
California's economy just surpassed Japan's you colossal moron.
 

TigerRagRob

Heisman
Sep 23, 2001
22,572
13,656
113
Liberal youth are 1,000x more American than the average Trump supporters. Trump supporters are worthless traitors. Trump supporters are not people.
Lmao right after they were marching in NY carrying Soviet Communist flags. Nothing says American like marching with a Soviet Communist flags....
 

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
33,196
8,449
113
California's economy just surpassed Japan's you colossal moron.
It gets better. Captain Houseboat has previously disclosed, via one or more posts on the Penn State politics board, that he lives and works part of the year in California. Who knows if that is still true, but it was funny to read those posts.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Chumpsky

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,050
3,673
113
I practice law in California, which is a community property state. You live in Florida, which is a common law state. Common law states are often referred to as "title holding states" by estate planning attorneys, because the mere form in which title is held is frequently determinative of: (i) how assets are divided up and allocated to the spouses in the event of a divorce; and (ii) the amount of freedom each spouse has in making testamentary dispositions (i.e., bequests) of such assets. By comparison, property held by a married resident of a community property state may be community property or quasi-community property notwithstanding that fact that it is held in the name of one spouse alone, and the characterization of spousal property as either community or separate has a profound impact on how it is divided upon divorce and distributed upon death of a spouse.

Moreover, although property received by one spouse via gift or inheritance is deemed to be that spouse's separate property, it is relatively easy to "transmute" (legalese for convert) separate property into community property. Depositing inherited money into a joint spousal bank account that also holds their salary income would transmute the inherited money from separate to community.

The bottom line is that a prenup or postnup is generally more useful (i.e. needed) in a community property state in order to preserve gifted or inherited assets from the claims of the recipient's spouse. But most common law states have "dower and curtesy" laws that provide some protection for surviving, non-title holding spouses. They vary from state to state. But, just as the operation of California's community and separate property laws can be varied by agreement of the spouses, my guess is that the relevant laws in a title holding jurisdiction like Florida can also be altered by agreement of the spouses.

While it is clear to me that your granddaughter and her future husband could enter into an enforceable prenup or postnup, it is not at all clear to me whether you could contractually bind your granddaughter to enter into a prenup or postnup at some future point as a condition precedent to receiving her gift or inheritance. Contracts pertaining to marriage and marriage rights generally receive closer scrutiny, and are occasionally deemed unenforceable on public policy grounds. It sounds like you have multiple grandchildren whom you would like to see enter into a future prenup. I think this is an occasion where you should seek the advice of a Florida attorney. And if a given child resides in some other state, then perhaps an attorney from that state as well. You should seek to minimize the application of any other state's laws by inserting a "Governing Law" clause in the trust agreement specifying that Florida law governs any disputes or legal actions concerning your trust.

You could put all of the money into a single "pot" trust for your grandchildren and structure that trust as a "discretionary" trust that gives the Trustee absolute discretion over whom to distribute to and how much to distribute. And then instruct that Trustee verbally as to your wishes concerning grandchild prenups, so that it would hopefully be taken into account by the Trustee when making later trust distributions, rather than risk putting express verbiage in the Trust agreement that might later be deemed unenforceable. But you had better be careful in selecting a Trustee. You would need to feel very confident that the Trustee will use his or her discretion in a way that carries out your testamentary intent.
thanks, I didn't expect you to go into that much detail..thanks ..Maybe I'll just send it myself, it would be easier :)