Adding a socioeconomic part to it. Thoughts? https://www.iahsaa.org/board-briefs-dec-6-2022/
S sporthog_9er All-Conference Jun 9, 2001 1,327 1,178 113 Dec 6, 2022 #1 Adding a socioeconomic part to it. Thoughts? https://www.iahsaa.org/board-briefs-dec-6-2022/
A Alexander33 All-Conference Oct 24, 2016 803 1,079 93 Dec 6, 2022 #2 sporthog9er said: Adding a socioeconomic part to it. Thoughts? https://www.iahsaa.org/board-briefs-dec-6-2022/ Click to expand... East St. Louis and Peoria seemed to do pretty well this year. New Trier and Hinsdale Central didn't qualify for the playoffs. Reactions: RD_Watcher and sporthog9er
sporthog9er said: Adding a socioeconomic part to it. Thoughts? https://www.iahsaa.org/board-briefs-dec-6-2022/ Click to expand... East St. Louis and Peoria seemed to do pretty well this year. New Trier and Hinsdale Central didn't qualify for the playoffs.
L laramie_amgd Redshirt Nov 12, 2016 26 33 0 Dec 6, 2022 #3 so a kid getting a free lunch is only 0.6 of an athlete, no thanks
U UlbKA91 Junior Sep 22, 2015 1,037 309 0 Dec 6, 2022 #4 laramie_amgd said: so a kid getting a free lunch is only 0.6 of an athlete, no thanks Click to expand... A-ha! somebody forgot to read their pocket Constitution, unless Steve King is back on the Iowa scene. Do they still make Bowie Nutrition Bars? That might add .2.
laramie_amgd said: so a kid getting a free lunch is only 0.6 of an athlete, no thanks Click to expand... A-ha! somebody forgot to read their pocket Constitution, unless Steve King is back on the Iowa scene. Do they still make Bowie Nutrition Bars? That might add .2.