Phase 2 is going to be fun. Now we will get to find out who did what in regards to the 702 searches. Dollars to doughnuts the dossier kicked those off.
Impressive
- Thread starter countryroads89_rivals
- Start date
Phase 2 is going to be fun. Now we will get to find out who did what in regards to the 702 searches. Dollars to doughnuts the dossier kicked those off.
You have no clue because the FBI required substantial edit and redacting.......
Critically, Grassley and Graham assert that the Steele dossier formed the “bulk” of the FISA application, and as important, that the application “appears to contain no additional information corroborating the dossier allegations against Mr. Page,” and that the FBI “relied more heavily on Steele's credibility than on any independent verification or corroboration for his claims.”
Link
Nunes pretty much had said the same. Schiff didn't refute it, except for stating there was other evidence. If this evidence was so compelling, why wasn't it included in the warrant, and why didn't they attempt a warrant before the dossier, if that were the case? Logic says this Dem memo is full of Schiff.
The other evidence was the Isakoff article. That is why everyone is so incredulous.
If it's dossier and Isikoff only, this is the most asinine argument from the Democrats ever.
Exactly
If carters previous work with the FBI is part of it they lied about it because he worked with the FBI and the FBI found him as pretty useless.
LOL!
You just don’t know when to quit. Amazing. Thanks for the free entertainment. You are the best!
A few key points, which can’t be falsified in arguments from either side and shed a lot of light on this issue.
There was a trial of a Russian spy and Page was already involved in that and as a result of the investigation, the FBI already knew Page was slimy and corrupt. Look at the timing of that trial. The GOP screwed up the timeline in their smear memo.
FISAs were renewed repeatedly based on intelligence gathered and were renewed by four different judges who were appointed by Republican presidents. Obviously they were gathering useful information on Page.
Page lied about his trip to Russia and lied about meeting with Russians and then lied about lying. Innocent people don’t lie.
Page was not sleazy and corrupt. He helped the FBI get the spy. You dont know what you are talking about. Huge shocker.
Hahahaha the trial Page was working with the FBI on? Ok.
No one has disputed the reup of the FISA or the requirements to have it reupped. I’m not sure what the fact that it was GOP appointed judges has to do with anything. Are judges supposed to apply political ideology into their decision making? That’s not what I expect out of them, but I can see it’s what you expect.
Regardless, if the original FISA was propagated by a confluence of ********, nothing else matters.
Judges make rulings based on the evidence in front of them. The system relies on prosecutors and judges being honest.
He was an FBI informant in that event, idiot. He was helping the FBI. The Russians would call you a moron, also.
Meantime, we're still trying to figure out from @wvu2007 's excellent poll if country is a racist White person who hates Blacks and other Whites who vote Republican or a racist Black person who hates Whites and other Blacks who do?(vote Republican) We're not even sure if country knows what race he is?[smoke]
Months after the dossier was presented to the FISA court as rock solid "evidence" for granting a warrant to spy on Trump's people the FBI tells Trump a dossier floating around about him is "unsubstantiated"?
You know a lie isn't any good if you can't keep it straight to whoever you're telling it to?
Do you have be the same race you're racist to or can you switch races depending on which race you hate?
Last edited:
Curious to me how the Dems insist "other" information was used to secure that FISA warrant but it's too senstive for us to know exactly what it was. However they were against releasing the Nunes memo for the same reason and nothing in that memo revealed anything other than that dossier which was used to get the same warrant!
Exactly! On top of that they claimed the Nunes memo had information that would jeopardize national security but nothing they released in their memo does either so what exactly was it in the Nunes memo they were worried about getting out? (other than the fact the fake dossier was their main piece of evidence on the FISA appl?) Their lies are not even adding up with the ones they told to cover up the Truth from getting out!
Why do you think they never said Nunes memo was a lie but instead claimed it left out facts? They intended to make that claim and drafted a memo full of sources and methods daring the white to not release it so they could claim the White Hiuse didnt want us to see what Nunes left out. Plan failed.
That's exactly what they did but funny how we still don't know what else was in their application to the FISA court for the warrant! Ans: There was nothing else!
I swear that is a strange looking Hombre
Article link:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018...igation-harms-democrats-more-than-helps-them/
exceprt:
"The FBI and the Justice Department heavily relied on the Steele dossier’s uncorroborated allegations. You know this is true because, notwithstanding the claim that “only narrow use” was made “of information from Steele’s sources,” the Democrats end up acknowledging that “only narrow use” actually means significant use — as in, the dossier was the sine qua non of the warrant application"
BTW---this article is THE most well written, well explained, easily understood analysis of the entire Democrat scheme to spy on Trump and then lie about it. Highly recommended reading---long but informative.