IMPACT GAMES THREAD

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
New Mexico vs. Utah State has been an affront to the sport for the past five minutes. JV level ball being played by both sides.
 

armenius

All-Conference
Nov 4, 2011
803
1,275
93
New Mexico vs. Utah State has been an affront to the sport for the past five minutes. JV level ball being played by both sides.

That was true for 37 minutes. The last 3 minutes were awesome. Too bad USU won, but great game.
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
Thursday, March 5 Recap

New Mexico
at Utah St. (Utah St., 75-70)
Washington at Arizona St. (Washington, 90-83)
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
Rutgers = 8 Seed

Last 4 Byes
Xavier
Stanford
USC
Texas

Last 4 In
Arizona St.
Wichita St.
Purdue
Utah St.

First 4 Out
Arkansas
Cincinnati
Richmond
Mississippi St.

Next 4 Out
North Carolina St.
Tennessee
Memphis
UCLA
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
Friday, March 6

Wyoming
at Utah St.
Drake at Northern Iowa
Richmond at Duquesne
Wake Forest
at North Carolina St.

Niagara at Canisius
 

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,478
16,327
113
Wyoming is terrible and has upset Colorado State and Nevada. Unfortunately, it looks like Utah State should rack up another W tonight. I think 25-8 with wins at Florida and at LSU would lock them in.
 

Shell21

Heisman
Mar 23, 2004
35,243
24,875
113
do we really want drake to win this game? would this loss knock northern iowa out? it should. can't lose to drake in the quarters, but are we sure that the committee would know them completely out. the mvc will be a bid stealer if it they lose and they still get an at large
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU23_rivals

RutgHoops

Heisman
Aug 14, 2008
9,239
12,411
102
do we really want drake to win this game? would this loss knock northern iowa out? it should. can't lose to drake in the quarters, but are we sure that the committee would know them completely out. the mvc will be a bid stealer if it they lose and they still get an at large

Yes we do. UNI is at #36 in NET and Rutgers at #31. Losing on a neutral floor to #167 Drake would have to drop them in to the mid-40s I would think. MVC would become a one bid league (imo). I'm not sure how you'd put them in over us. UNI would have one Quad-1 win and three Quad-3 losses.
 

Shell21

Heisman
Mar 23, 2004
35,243
24,875
113
right, but they were going to get in as the automatic bid from the conference; meaning no one else from conference would get a bid; now thats in jeopardy, if the committee still likes their overal resume
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU23_rivals

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,357
12,663
78
do we really want drake to win this game? would this loss knock northern iowa out? it should. can't lose to drake in the quarters, but are we sure that the committee would know them completely out. the mvc will be a bid stealer if it they lose and they still get an at large

I’m not sure. Certainly better for them to lose now than at any other point in the MVC tourney though.

The loss definitely worse for the B12 bubble than for us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU23_rivals

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,432
7,711
113
Yes we do. UNI is at #36 in NET and Rutgers at #31. Losing on a neutral floor to #167 Drake would have to drop them a round the mid-40s I would think. MVC would become a one bid league (imo). I'm not sure how you'd put them in over us. UNI would have one Quad-1 ween and three quad 3 losses.
Not a great scenario as this is the first bid stealer. No. Iowa’s Net and Kenpom metrics are real good and much better than East Tennessee State .Damn!!!,
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,963
177,603
113
Yes we do. UNI is at #36 in NET and Rutgers at #31. Losing on a neutral floor to #167 Drake would have to drop them in to the mid-40s I would think. MVC would become a one bid league (imo). I'm not sure how you'd put them in over us. UNI would have one Quad-1 win and three Quad-3 losses.


they can easily put them over us.....they took Belmont last year when they didnt have to. Not a good thing, for RU or any power 6 bubble..and these kind of thingss are impossible to predict

a bracketologists worst nightmare
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU23_rivals

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,963
177,603
113
honestly though losing by 18 is a pretty big loss...we shall see what happens with the metrics tomorrow
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,963
177,603
113
the best news is this may open the door for another year of Sister Jean
 

LeapinLou

All-American
Jul 24, 2001
13,183
6,876
113
it will be their 3rd Q3 loss...that is tough to overcome

I was just coming here to ask you. Is UNI a viable candidate for an at large bid or not? Your initial feeling is no? Would not be good for bubble teams if this conference got two in.
 

ScarletWalk11

Junior
Jan 11, 2009
190
325
0
21 point loss to the 167th ranked team in the NET is a very bad look. Drake had 0 quad 1 or quad 2 wins coming into today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

RutgHoops

Heisman
Aug 14, 2008
9,239
12,411
102
they can easily put them over us.....they took Belmont last year when they didnt have to. Not a good thing, for RU or any power 6 bubble..and these kind of thingss are impossible to predict

a bracketologists worst nightmare

I know anything can happen in that room, but it is tough to argue UNI v RU resume after this. Even if we lose two, UNI will be behind us in NET, kenpom, less Quad-1 wins, more Quad-3 losses, etc..

I simply want to see Rutgers with better/materially better resume than the teams we are competing with for an at-large. After a 21 point Quad-3 loss I am fairly certain, on paper, Rutgers is better than UNI. Doesn't mean the "let a mid-major at large in" won't happen, but it is tough to make that case versus Rutgers at this point (imo).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,357
12,663
78
right, but they were going to get in as the automatic bid from the conference; meaning no one else from conference would get a bid; now thats in jeopardy, if the committee still likes their overal resume

That normally would be true. However, based on some weird math anomalies with the NET calculation, WVU is serving as the marquis win for multiple B12 bubble teams. Theres no question this loss definitely hurts WVU’s body of work. They can still make it moot by beating Baylor in M-town tomorrow but if not, their resume is definitely weaker following this loss. It’s their second best win and now it might drop to Q2. Only top 50 are Q1 right? So they started as 36 and will get pushed further down and the other tournaments continue. Going to be close.
 

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,432
7,711
113
they can easily put them over us.....they took Belmont last year when they didnt have to. Not a good thing, for RU or any power 6 bubble..and these kind of thingss are impossible to predict

a bracketologists worst nightmare
It is a bid stealer and worse for the true bubble teams. Rutgers is in as a 10 per Most bracketologists as of now. I agree BiG 12 and PAC 12 and NC State should be feeling worse than us.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,963
177,603
113
in looking at things, It would appear Northern Iowa is behind Richmond, Utah State, and Wichita State and Cincy and Memphis in basically everything....cannot justify taking a Northern Iowa if those schools are not going, it would be criminal...so I would agree with you now that i compared some resumes.
 
Last edited:

Scarlet Blind_rivals

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2001
4,621
4,681
62
UNI 1 Q1 win @ 23 Colorado
1 Q1:Close loss N 19 WVU
3 Q2 wins N 60 S.Carolina
@ 124 Mizz St. @ 110 Bradley

Q1 1-1 Q2 3-2 if they get in it's first 4 only, don't think they have enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutgHoops

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,963
177,603
113
That normally would be true. However, based on some weird math anomalies with the NET calculation, WVU is serving as the marquis win for multiple B12 bubble teams. Theres no question this loss definitely hurts WVU’s body of work. They can still make it moot by beating Baylor in M-town tomorrow but if not, their resume is definitely weaker following this loss. It’s their second best win and now it might drop to Q2. Only top 50 are Q1 right? So they started as 36 and will get pushed further down and the other tournaments continue. Going to be close.


yes what is fascinating to watch with the net and bubble watches is how losses are perceived 3 weeks ago vs now...lots of changes...the Pac 12 and SEC and Big 12 wins are very pedestrian as we go toward the end of the season
 

SirScarlet

Heisman
Jun 27, 2001
27,317
44,419
113
in looking at things, It would appear Northern Iowa is behind Richmond, Utah State, and Wichita State and Cincy and Memphis in basically everything....cannot justify taking a Northern Iowa if those schools are going, it would be criminal...so I would agree with you now that i compared some resumes.

Sorry...so do we want them to win or not?

Lol and TIA
 

RutgHoops

Heisman
Aug 14, 2008
9,239
12,411
102
UNI 1 Q1 win @ 23 Colorado
1 Q1:Close loss N 19 WVU
3 Q2 wins N 60 S.Carolina
@ 124 Mizz St. @ 110 Bradley

Q1 1-1 Q2 3-2 if they get in it's first 4 only, don't think they have enough.

Yup. And Rutgers has 4 Q1 wins and 4 Q2 wins. Including wins over #14 SHU and #18 Mary. And regardless of what happens our NET will be better than UNI, kenpom better than UNI, etc.

Doesn't mean the committee won't put UNI in. What I believe this does mean is if they put them in it likely won't be at our expense. Because (imo) if they are in a debate about UNI we will (hopefully/likely) already be locked in as our team sheet is materially better.

Just my $0.02
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,963
177,603
113
s they took Belmont last year but Belmont was 6-4 vs Q1 and 2 although the only tourney team they beat was Murray State who they lost to in the OVC finalsTheir sos non conference was 43 but had only 2 Q3 losses not 3 and losing in finals of conference tourney way better than losing in quarters
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutgHoops

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,357
12,663
78
Look guys - take it for what it’s worth but even Palm’s blog from yesterday said that Northern Iowa’s only path to at large consideration was a loss to the second place team.

Pretty much every bracket had them as an 11 seed as an auto bid. A 21 point loss in the first road to the 8 seed MVC team means 3 less wins than they would’ve had to get the auto bid and an additional very bad loss. Again - they were a projected 11 seed assuming these additional 3 wins and not taking the drake loss.

I’d probably put RU’s chances of getting the BIG auto bid higher than Northern Iowa’s chances of at large. They’d need deep runs now by Colorado and South Carolina both to even be in the discussions.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,963
177,603
113
Sister Jean today

 
  • Like
Reactions: gregkoko

TonyLieske

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2008
8,786
3,588
113
I think what most of you are missing with N. Iowa is the number of road wins they have. They are pretty much a lock.
 

Scarlet Shack

Heisman
Feb 3, 2004
26,283
15,978
73
in looking at things, It would appear Northern Iowa is behind Richmond, Utah State, and Wichita State and Cincy and Memphis in basically everything....cannot justify taking a Northern Iowa if those schools are not going, it would be criminal...so I would agree with you now that i compared some resumes.

Agree

Northern Iowa did beat South Carolina and Colorado and lost to West va. That’s going to help their cause ...they are very much on the bubble and will be sweating for the next 9 days ...but a 21 point loss to 167 ranked drake ...that’s a really bad look to close out your resume.
 
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
Not an impact game for us but for the basketball junkies out there two pretty quality games in NJ tonight. Iona @ st peters and siena @ monmouth.

If st peters wins and siena loses, st peters wins the maac which would be truly remarkable as its only sha’s 2nd year and talk about turning chicken salad into chicken ****, st peters has NOTHING to work with. Their gym is worse than 90% of high school gyms

ill be at the SPU game rooting on the peacocks. I go to their games any time they dont conflict with RU. Fun team to watch.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Not an impact game for us but for the basketball junkies out there two pretty quality games in NJ tonight. Iona @ st peters and siena @ monmouth.

If st peters wins and siena loses, st peters wins the maac which would be truly remarkable as its only sha’s 2nd year and talk about turning chicken salad into chicken ****, st peters has NOTHING to work with. Their gym is worse than 90% of high school gyms
I didn't even know St. Peter's was a college until you brought it up the other day. Just googled it and see it's in JC. Lived in Bergen county for years no idea. Shows how small and meaningless that place is. Coach must be great
 
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
I didn't even know St. Peter's was a college until you brought it up the other day. Just googled it and see it's in JC. Lived in Bergen county for years no idea. Shows how small and meaningless that place is. Coach must be great
Yeah its like 5-10 mins from my apartment and ive played with some alums so I just go all the time. Honestly you can pretty much just walk in and no one will say anything. And ill tell ya what, i personally think its easier to be a ref in front of 15,000 booing you than 500 getting on you. You can hear every single word the 500 say haha. Theres this one fan at every game who very angrily berates the refs, like i actually think hed fight them if he was physically capable, hes not joking with his chirps hes truly out for blood haha. Guy is like at least 75
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,963
177,603
113
Duquense beat Rutgers 2x the last time RU made the NCAA tournament back in 1991, its time for them for them to do us a favor 29 years later tonight
 

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,257
0
years ago st.peters made the NIT often and were very competitive--I think they may have played at the JC Armory.