I'm done with Newsmax...

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
816
113
Who gives a **** what Newsmax claims? Why would they say that?
 

op2

All-Conference
Mar 16, 2014
11,689
1,298
103
I'd be done with a channel where it's people yelling over each other too.

Matt Taibbi is a good journalist I follow and I saw him recently interviewed by something called "News Nation" that I had never seen before. In looking it up, it seems that WGN in Chicago is transforming over into News Nation with the mission of just reporting the news instead of editorializing along with it like the networks and cable news channels do. I've read a bit of their stuff and it seems good, although I haven't delved into it too much. They have broadcasts too but I've never seen one, although it says there will be one at the link below from 8 to 11 tonight, and it's only a few minutes until 8 now, so maybe I'll check it out. It would be so nice to see a new show where they just give you, you know, the news.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/news-nation-live/

ETA: It seems you need a TV provider to see the broadcast so I guess I won't be seeing it. I'll still go to their webpage for news now and then though.
 

bgregory74

All-Conference
Jan 1, 2019
21,847
3,738
113
I'd be done with a channel where it's people yelling over each other too.

Matt Taibbi is a good journalist I follow and I saw him recently interviewed by something called "News Nation" that I had never seen before. In looking it up, it seems that WGN in Chicago is transforming over into News Nation with the mission of just reporting the news instead of editorializing along with it like the networks and cable news channels do. I've read a bit of their stuff and it seems good, although I haven't delved into it too much. They have broadcasts too but I've never seen one, although it says there will be one at the link below from 8 to 11 tonight, and it's only a few minutes until 8 now, so maybe I'll check it out. It would be so nice to see a new show where they just give you, you know, the news.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/news-nation-live/
It’s not bad. I’ve watched it some. It’s certainly balanced.
 

bgregory74

All-Conference
Jan 1, 2019
21,847
3,738
113
Why not just allow Lindell and Trump bury themselves in a court of law? By refusing to hear it, they don’t have to rule on it. And that is the facts.
Yea I agree. If they did nothing wrong I’m sure Trump would bury himself. Trump scares them because he’s right.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
816
113
I noti

Notice Lindell didn’t say a word about voter fraud. Seems he learned a lesson too.
The reaction by the interviewer the first time was completely unprofessional. He could have simply stated newsmax position and let the guy speak. It was rude and unproductive.
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
The reaction by the interviewer the first time was completely unprofessional. He could have simply stated newsmax position and let the guy speak. It was rude and unproductive.
I agree with that. It was sort of childish actually. Walking off set like that should get him canned.
 

bgregory74

All-Conference
Jan 1, 2019
21,847
3,738
113
The reaction by the interviewer the first time was completely unprofessional. He could have simply stated newsmax position and let the guy speak. It was rude and unproductive.
Absolutely. Lindell came in guns blazing too but you have to expect that.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
816
113
I agree with that. It was sort of childish actually. Walking off set like that should get him canned.
That is what I thought too. Its not the first time a TV interview went sideways and the pros handle it way better than that. It was almost like he wanted to make a point that he would not let the guy say what he was saying.
 

WVU80ate_rivals

Redshirt
Jun 10, 2003
4,243
0
0
The reaction by the interviewer the first time was completely unprofessional. He could have simply stated newsmax position and let the guy speak. It was rude and unproductive.
That behavior, like all msm, only confirms the likelihood the election was stolen. Suppressing Trump and Lindell when they claim to have evidence only creates doubt in our election integrity. Social media silencing them both is proof. If you know without a doubt the election was secure, why not allow them to make fools of themselves in a court of law? They’re hiding something. Biden did not win. And it wasn’t even close.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
816
113
That behavior, like all msm, only confirms the likelihood the election was stolen. Suppressing Trump and Lindell when they claim to have evidence only creates doubt in our election integrity. Social media silencing them both is proof. If you know without a doubt the election was secure, why not allow them to make fools of themselves in a court of law? They’re hiding something. Biden did not win. And it wasn’t even close.
Their own policy which he quoted admits there was fraud but goes on to state the elections were certified so Newsmax respects that.
 

WVU80ate_rivals

Redshirt
Jun 10, 2003
4,243
0
0
Their own policy which he quoted admits there was fraud but goes on to state the elections were certified so Newsmax respects that.
Yeah we’re in a banana republic now. Shrug our shoulders and turn our heads in the face of crime. “Yeah they cheated. Oh well. Just don’t talk about it. We’re ok with it”.