IF

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,423
5,988
113
Why would they be looking at anyones taxes anyway? If they are examining bank records and the subject didnt claim a bank account to the special prosecutor why would he have claimed it on his taxes?

They would impeach Trump for breathing if they could....he wasn't supposed to make a living and then run for Office. That's a crime.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,423
5,988
113
...




Did you happen to notice @CpEER's strong rebuttals to these posted facts? Did you happen to miss the media's reporting on any of this? That's OK, so did the rest of us. DOJ missed prosecuting her for any of it too, so we're all even.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,423
5,988
113
It actually does. Mueller is charged with finding collusion.

Well, that's what he was charged to look into, but he can find anything remotely related to that and it appears that's exactly what he's been doing since the "collusion" rabbit trail dried up a long time ago. Like about a year ago?
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,423
5,988
113
Does it matter? LOL.

You're right country. Trump's alive and still in Office and this of course is not only illegal, it's unConstitutional even an unrealistic nightmare to you Leftists.

Why it's even against the Laws of nature itself!
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,850
281
83
Please please please.... stop using the term "laundered money". Trump doesn't need to launder money. Evade taxes... hide money... sure, but not launder.
Let's say for example that he sold a house in Florida to a Russian for waaaaaay more than it was worth, etc. Trump may not need to but he could have become involved in a laundering scheme that would help out a very wealthy Russian.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,423
5,988
113
Let's say for example that he sold a house in Florida to a Russian for waaaaaay more than it was worth, etc. Trump may not need to but he could have become involved in a laundering scheme that would help out a very wealthy Russian.

That should be enough to get rid of him.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,423
5,988
113
Did she ask for a recount? Did she actually challenge the outcome of the election? Did she claim that she actually won? of course not.

No of course not. Her, her campaign, and the sycophant media simply went on a PR drive to convince the voters Trump cheated, and his election was tainted by "colluding" with the Russians! We're STILL hearing about it two years later only now it's not "collusion" per se it's "meddling" and they're "meddling" with our trips even to the header!
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,209
3,292
113
Did she ask for a recount? Did she actually challenge the outcome of the election? Did she claim that she actually won? of course not.
Ohhhh no, not her. It was Jill Stein who asked for it. Hahahahha and if you believe she was doing that all on her own, I’ve got a sandwich I just cooked up for you.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
Let's say for example that he sold a house in Florida to a Russian for waaaaaay more than it was worth, etc. Trump may not need to but he could have become involved in a laundering scheme that would help out a very wealthy Russian.
Hahaha. Everyone knows if you are going to launder money you do it through a famous recognizable and highly prominant person.
 
Last edited: