View attachment 7447
Page 80 just kicks any sensible UM fan right in the nuts. Read "witness credibility" a couple of times and then replay in your mind all of what the imbeciles have said over and over about credibility and who has it.
The NCAA didn't just say lewis was credible, they outlined why he was.
They have all been wrong. Every time. They have been lied to, bullshitted, misdirected, misled, and embarrassed when they ran to every source they could and regurgitated it. And every time.. wrong... wrong.... wrong.... wrong.
It goes on to page 81 saying it's the UM folks that are not credible. The enforcement's written reply just takes a huge dump on their response and also any hope that failure to monitor and LOIC is off the table.
Page 80 just kicks any sensible UM fan right in the nuts. Read "witness credibility" a couple of times and then replay in your mind all of what the imbeciles have said over and over about credibility and who has it.
The NCAA didn't just say lewis was credible, they outlined why he was.
They have all been wrong. Every time. They have been lied to, bullshitted, misdirected, misled, and embarrassed when they ran to every source they could and regurgitated it. And every time.. wrong... wrong.... wrong.... wrong.
It goes on to page 81 saying it's the UM folks that are not credible. The enforcement's written reply just takes a huge dump on their response and also any hope that failure to monitor and LOIC is off the table.