Agents a weak *** ole miss team, weak *** auburn team, Tennessee at home and SC at home. Let's put this Bama game behind us.
I think we will win 4 in a row...
- Thread starter hailstate19
- Start date
That ole miss team took #5 Baylor to the wire tonight before losing 78-75. Going on the road will be tough, especially in a rivalry game.
If we play any of those 4 teams right now, we lose all four. Not our year. 3-1 was fun while it lasted.
I'm so sick and tired of this attitude like we are going to get our heads smashed in each game. Were about to do some *** kicking in Oxford. You watch.
Ok Einstein,
I bet we don't go 0-4 over the next four as you claimed. Wager is loser leaves the board. How bou dat?
I bet we don't go 0-4 over the next four as you claimed. Wager is loser leaves the board. How bou dat?
Hate to play the comprehension card...but reading is, and has never been, your strong suit. Quote me where I said we'd go "0-4 over the next four". Bye bye. You lose, leave the board now. We'll miss you.*******
Shirley you're not this dumb.
It's literally right above here, for eVERYONE to see. So again, I'll bet you we don't go 0-4 against those teams, as you said.
PSA: thank you for pointing out to us that you're a complete dubmass. Now I can totally disregard all post from you, in the future.
It's literally right above here, for eVERYONE to see. So again, I'll bet you we don't go 0-4 against those teams, as you said.
PSA: thank you for pointing out to us that you're a complete dubmass. Now I can totally disregard all post from you, in the future.
Last edited:
BuT ur reeDInG
Comprehenshunz fale!!! He didNT say the nexT for!1 he jus named the TEamz uf tha necks foR gaYmZ wee PlaY!11 StooPId!!!1
Comprehenshunz fale!!! He didNT say the nexT for!1 he jus named the TEamz uf tha necks foR gaYmZ wee PlaY!11 StooPId!!!1
Some of y'all are hilarious. We played a 6-2 SEC at their place, got outscored at the ft line by 20, didn't shoot very well from 3, actually outrebounded them (a few weeks after getting outrebounded by them by 15 at our place), and had a lead late and were in it until they pulled away with a couple of minutes to go... And now it's like we won't win a game for the rest of the season.
Here's a newsflash- if both teams shoot their season average percentage from the ft line today, that game is at least going to OT. If both teams shoot their avereage percentage from the ft line AND we don't lose IJ Ready, we may have won that game comfortably.
Losing IJ will hurt us going forward- depending upon how long he's out. I don't know how this season finishes. We certainly aren't a great team (and anyone who expected that coming into the season was asinine) but we aren't terrible either. The SEC schedule leaves a lot of win opportunities down the stretch. Regardless, exciting times are coming in basketball.
Here's a newsflash- if both teams shoot their season average percentage from the ft line today, that game is at least going to OT. If both teams shoot their avereage percentage from the ft line AND we don't lose IJ Ready, we may have won that game comfortably.
Losing IJ will hurt us going forward- depending upon how long he's out. I don't know how this season finishes. We certainly aren't a great team (and anyone who expected that coming into the season was asinine) but we aren't terrible either. The SEC schedule leaves a lot of win opportunities down the stretch. Regardless, exciting times are coming in basketball.
Question: Do you have two or more SEC caliber front court players? If so, and Ole Miss fails to equalize by shooting well from 3, you'll win. Perhaps easily.
Otherwise Ole Miss will probably win. I don't know much about your team but I know ours is one man down low and a bunch of guards that can't shoot.
Otherwise Ole Miss will probably win. I don't know much about your team but I know ours is one man down low and a bunch of guards that can't shoot.
'Right now'—the time he posted—is not the two weeks that will in fact pass (in which the team might grow or other teams might falter). In four alternate universes where everything is equal except MSU playing any of those four teams last night instead of Alabama, he said MSU would be collectively 0-4. He was being a pessimist. You're either being an idiot or an *******. You could also be both.
Last edited:
No set of outcomes would surprise me with our middling team on this weak league, but 4-0 would be the most surprising, followed by 0-4.
Well we could also
go undefeated in this mythical space-time continuum we are speaking of. However, rational people can take his statement at face value, alluding to us going 0-4, having lost 5 in a row. Thanks for your input, Michio Kaku.
ETA: If you had read the rest of his post, the context describes the rest of the season from those individual standpoints. He even qualified it further in the next post, asking what was good about our team in relation to the season as a whole. Maybe you should've brushed up on your reading comprehension, Michio. Next time, try not to think to hard, you may hurt yourself.
go undefeated in this mythical space-time continuum we are speaking of. However, rational people can take his statement at face value, alluding to us going 0-4, having lost 5 in a row. Thanks for your input, Michio Kaku.
ETA: If you had read the rest of his post, the context describes the rest of the season from those individual standpoints. He even qualified it further in the next post, asking what was good about our team in relation to the season as a whole. Maybe you should've brushed up on your reading comprehension, Michio. Next time, try not to think to hard, you may hurt yourself.
Last edited:
You don't have to be a physicist to know that 'We would lose to all four of them if we played them right now' and 'We will lose to all four of them in succession over the course of the next fourteen days' do not mean the same thing in the English language. 'It isn't our year' is not synonymous with 'We will lose to all four of them in succession over the course of the next fourteen days' either. And to be clear: 'Tell me what's so great about our team' also does not mean 'We will lose to all four of them in succession...'
I suppose 'rational people' refers to you and all the other people who, obviously, misinterpreted his assertion.
Your interpretation of 'allusions' and 'context' < What he literally said and claimed thereafter to have meant.
I have never heard anyone use the words 'right now' to refer to the next two weeks. Do you speak a private language?
I suppose 'rational people' refers to you and all the other people who, obviously, misinterpreted his assertion.
Your interpretation of 'allusions' and 'context' < What he literally said and claimed thereafter to have meant.
I have never heard anyone use the words 'right now' to refer to the next two weeks. Do you speak a private language?
Last edited:
We is po miss'ppi state and should just be happy squeaking a win from delta southern school for one legged children.
Read his posts.
He wasn't be referring to playing those 4 games in some hypothetical time warp.
I hate to break it to you Michio, but that's what he wrote.
You're either being contrite or obtuse, or both.
He wasn't be referring to playing those 4 games in some hypothetical time warp.
I hate to break it to you Michio, but that's what he wrote.
You're either being contrite or obtuse, or both.
'If we played any of those four teams right now...' is, obviously, a hypothetical statement. No matter how often I read his post the words are not going to rearrange themselves into 'When we play these four teams in the next two weeks we are going to lose to all four of them.'
His statement is analogous to: 'If you had a clue right now you would know what he meant'—it is not analogous to: 'When you get a clue over the next two weeks you will know what he meant.'
—
'If X occurred, Y would happen.'
Is not
'When X occurs, Y will happen.'
His statement is analogous to: 'If you had a clue right now you would know what he meant'—it is not analogous to: 'When you get a clue over the next two weeks you will know what he meant.'
—
'If X occurred, Y would happen.'
Is not
'When X occurs, Y will happen.'
Last edited:
An interesting argument to follow
1. You begin with misinterpreting what he posted, perhaps because you were itching to call him an idiot.
2. You claim your misinterpretation is what he 'literally' said, though he literally said something different.
3. When called on this you say his meaning instead was in the 'context' and that he made 'allusions' to this in later posts, even though in said later posts he did quite the opposite of this.
4. Now you've given up the argument and resorted to being an ******* because you know you're full of ****.
1. You begin with misinterpreting what he posted, perhaps because you were itching to call him an idiot.
2. You claim your misinterpretation is what he 'literally' said, though he literally said something different.
3. When called on this you say his meaning instead was in the 'context' and that he made 'allusions' to this in later posts, even though in said later posts he did quite the opposite of this.
4. Now you've given up the argument and resorted to being an ******* because you know you're full of ****.
Last edited:
Nah, I just
came to the conclusion that it's useless arguing with conceited, blowhards. I showed you where you were wrong at least twice, and you still resist education. At this point, I'd just be wasting my time, but continue to be upset, and think about this the rest of the night/tomorrow. Thanks for reading, and try not to bust a spring.
came to the conclusion that it's useless arguing with conceited, blowhards. I showed you where you were wrong at least twice, and you still resist education. At this point, I'd just be wasting my time, but continue to be upset, and think about this the rest of the night/tomorrow. Thanks for reading, and try not to bust a spring.
You 'know' what he meant even though its not what he said and he later clarified this. As if you were in a position to know what he meant that he himself is not in. I give a few illustrations and you give a Derrida-like (i.e. nonsensical) 'answer' and call names and say I am 'upset.'
I will be amused, not just for days, but whenever I see you post in the future, that you claimed, seriously, that 'right now' can possibly mean 'over the next two weeks.'
Enjoy your alternative language.
I will be amused, not just for days, but whenever I see you post in the future, that you claimed, seriously, that 'right now' can possibly mean 'over the next two weeks.'
Enjoy your alternative language.
Last edited:
Latest
-
01
Maroon and White
Mississippi State PFF Grades from 41-9 loss to Auburn
-
02
Maroon and White Football
Lopsided analytics illustrate Mississippi State's collapse against Auburn
-
03
Maroon and White Football
"Not good enough": Jeff Lebby answers questions of performance and job security following blowout loss to Auburn
-
04
Maroon and White Football
Rapid Recap: Auburn 41-9 Mississippi State
-
05
Maroon and White Football
Last Call Predictions for Mississippi State vs. Auburn