I think that this will be the year...

Fitz51

Senior
Oct 21, 2008
10,115
649
0
I'll take MSU, PUR, MICH, MD, WIS, IOWA, and OSU. You get the other 7. I'll give you 5-1 odds.
 

ricko6543211

Junior
Nov 15, 2006
4,232
232
47
If this was a real bet, you would get at least 50-1.
I would take it at 50/1... I think the odds are a touch more than 5/1 but I think quite a bit less than 50. There are still decent teams below the top 7 this year.

I think Michigan and Illinois were both below 7 and have won it? Could be mistaken though. Illinois was back when it was an 11 team conference.
 

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
28,741
3,848
113
I would take it at 50/1... I think the odds are a touch more than 5/1 but I think quite a bit less than 50. There are still decent teams below the top 7 this year.

I think Michigan and Illinois were both below 7 and have won it? Could be mistaken though. Illinois was back when it was an 11 team conference.
The difference in the bet is one bettor is getting ALL 7 teams with the best odds of winning. Even getting all the bottom 7 teams doesn’t move the odds much, because the play in teams have virtually no chance of winning the needed 4 games to win the Tourney. It leaves you will 3 longshot teams, currently Minnesota, Illinois and Rutgers. Teams capable of winning a game, but 3 upsets seem 50-1 unlikely.
 

ricko6543211

Junior
Nov 15, 2006
4,232
232
47
The difference in the bet is one bettor is getting ALL 7 teams with the best odds of winning. Even getting all the bottom 7 teams doesn’t move the odds much, because the play in teams have virtually no chance of winning the needed 4 games to win the Tourney. It leaves you will 3 longshot teams, currently Minnesota, Illinois and Rutgers. Teams capable of winning a game, but 3 upsets seem 50-1 unlikely.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference_Men's_Basketball_Tournament

So I looked. One team has done it (Michigan as an 8 seed). The Illinois one I was remembering was a runner-up. They are 2 of the 4 seeds >7 that have been a runner-up.
 

ricko6543211

Junior
Nov 15, 2006
4,232
232
47
I think it would be more difficult this year because they have to beat at least 3 pretty good teams.
Well I will fake buy 50/1 from you in Monopoly money, 20 for 1000 (I would do it for real but obviously don’t know you and so not gonna settle up)... I think that number is quite a bit off and you’d be selling the tail a fair amount too cheaply.
 

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
28,741
3,848
113
Well I will fake buy 50/1 from you in Monopoly money, 20 for 1000 (I would do it for real but obviously don’t know you and so not gonna settle up)... I think that number is quite a bit off and you’d be selling the tail a fair amount too cheaply.
I am out of work, my bets are on hold. Just am not buying that a bottom half team comes out on top this year. Could be wrong as the top teams are not dominate. I like Michigan the best, but for all this talk of the Big Ten being powerful, I find the top teams balanced, dangerous, but we might not have a seed above 2-3.
 

mikewebb68

Senior
Oct 24, 2009
9,814
504
113
Ok, enough for one day. Time to hit the water.

I was out enjoying a nice day in the country, when I return to you spamming the board. You realize no one cares but maybe you, I and maybe Fitzphile, correct? To everyone else, bringing up these old threads only reflects badly on you, imo.

And, for the record, I said to Fitzphile "find something where I was wrong about OUR team" Posts like this were not about our team.

But congrats about finding 4 whole threads, of the hundreds of which I was involved in all season, where you found a prediction that wasn't 100% accurate. Wonder how many posts of yours I would find that were inaccurate? You don't have to worry about that, though, since I wouldn't clutter up the board again with that nonsense...

"No way Fitz wins 5 games!" LOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLL
 
Last edited:

IGNORE

Redshirt
Jan 15, 2019
3,584
0
0
I was out enjoying a nice day in the country, when I return to you spamming the board. You realize no one cares but maybe you, I and maybe Fitzphile, correct? To everyone else, bringing up these old threads only reflects badly on you, imo.

And, for the record, I said to Fitzphile "find something where I was wrong about OUR team" Posts like this were not about our team.

But congrats about finding 4 whole threads, of the hundreds of which I was involved in all season, where you found a prediction that wasn't 100% accurate. Wonder how many posts of yours I would find that were inaccurate? You don't have to worry about that, though, since I wouldn't clutter up the board again with that nonsense...

"No way Fitz wins 5 games!" LOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLL

I found four or five in five minutes. Then spent the day trying to fix a leaky pool, install new skimmers, busting arse. Tired and beaten, tomorrow is another day.
 

mikewebb68

Senior
Oct 24, 2009
9,814
504
113
I found four or five in five minutes. Then spent the day trying to fix a leaky pool, install new skimmers, busting arse. Tired and beaten, tomorrow is another day.

Hope it was worth it for you dredging up those old posts!
 
Wildcat Report

Latest

  1. 01 Wildcat Report Box or sideline? NU coaches detail philosophy as they send off Martin Stadium
  2. 02 Sports Predictions Colorado vs. Northwestern Polymarket odds: Opening point spread revealed, how to watch
  3. 03 Wildcat Report Notebook: Braun credits Martin Stadium as the 'perfect bridge' to new Ryan Field
  4. 04 Wildcat Report Recruit Roundup: Turpin stars on both sides of ball, Buirley and Norman score 4 TDs each
  5. 05 Wildcat Report WildcatReport Bye Week Mailbag Answers