I spy
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
‘cause a tool who writes an unsolicited 19 page letter sucking the POTUS’ nuts is totally believable.
And if you’re not a partisan hack, you use proper terminology like authorized monitoring of potential interference by a foreign adversary.
So thanks for confirming again Barr is partisan and thanks for showing you right wingers love those Russians.
#2 is Fulmore...
I've posted it 100 times...
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1112520650713899008.html
I've posted it 100 times...
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1112520650713899008.html
Bama bit.Spying, of course...
Hilliary was going to win...
no one would have EVER FOUND OUT...
How many of my questions in "where are the real journalists" can you answer country? @moe? @Boomboom521 ? @WVUBRU?
Last edited:
OK...so why not tell the Trump campaign if they were in danger of being penetrated by our enemy? Why not tell the FISA court? That dossier used to gain access to the campaign was never backed up by any person, place, or thing. Why not?
“Anyone who accuses FISA court judges of being a part of some conspiracy is a despicable human being and an embarrassment to this country.” Joe Scarborough, Republican.
Like this former FISA Court Judge who resigned because the system was being abused. SMH
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=1429647
Or the time Robert Mueller was questioned himself for possible abuses.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/white-house/428755-mueller-hauled-before-secret-fisa-court-to-address-fbi-abuses-in-2002?amp
William Barr was Attorney General for George H.W. Bush and later became friends with the family. The Bush family hates Trump. Branding this a conspiracy theory will not be a winning strategy.
If no violations happened then the below investigation would have concluded in short order. It didn't so going the conspiracy route will probably not age well.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...ion-into-fisa-abuse-is-still-active?_amp=true
Last edited:
I would think the Democrats would be supporting Barr's efforts to see if those FISA warrants were on the up and up? It would justify their claims of a Trump collusion cover-up, which is clearly grounds for impeachment!
If their objective is to get rid of this orange colored carnival barker, why not help Barr establish the means to do so?
Triggered they got after he announced he was going to look into it. Then it was crap "we got to change the narrative and attack William Bar as a looney toon Trump puppet". Going to be entertaining watching it all play out.
I'm thinking to myself...why complain about Barr investigating the reliability of the FISA warrants? That's the whole reason we were told it was necessary to spy on Trump in the first place correct?
So now they can just say "see...told 'ya he was was "colluding" with those Bolsheviks"...cover up!!!!! Impeach him!!!!!!![eyeroll]
Hey Dick? Why haven't you or anyone else on the Left told us what the "surveillance" on Trump's campaign was for? You all certainly didn't tell him while you were doing all that snooping did you?
"No collusion" "No obstruction"....so what were they looking for huh Dicky boy?
"if Donald Trump was half as dirty as the Left claims he is, why’d they feel the need to plant people in his campaign & try to entrap them? Why the need for illegal FISAs & spying?
Because he wasnt dirty at all. Thats why".
Exactly! They tried to set him up!
Comey also has a perfect opportunity RIGHT NOW to tell us what the actual national security threat was that led to the request for the FISA snooping! Why doesn't he expose both Barr's alleged "hiding" of Mueller's findings and the lies allegedly being told by the Left insisting they weren't "spying" on Trump? He could simply back his own assertions that it wasn't "spying" by announcing BEFORE Mueller's report is released what the true threat or risk was (national security) behind the FISA application?
We STILL don't know what it was, or what else they presented to the FISA court as evidence to back it up?
We do know however that the dossier used to obtain the snooping permission was as fake as he (Comey) is.
Hey, I'm a lying weasel...so what else do 'ya expect?
Because he wasnt dirty at all. Thats why".
Exactly! They tried to set him up!
Comey also has a perfect opportunity RIGHT NOW to tell us what the actual national security threat was that led to the request for the FISA snooping! Why doesn't he expose both Barr's alleged "hiding" of Mueller's findings and the lies allegedly being told by the Left insisting they weren't "spying" on Trump? He could simply back his own assertions that it wasn't "spying" by announcing BEFORE Mueller's report is released what the true threat or risk was (national security) behind the FISA application?
We STILL don't know what it was, or what else they presented to the FISA court as evidence to back it up?
We do know however that the dossier used to obtain the snooping permission was as fake as he (Comey) is.
Hey, I'm a lying weasel...so what else do 'ya expect?
Last edited:
Spying? Of course!
(true or false?)
Hey @Boomboom521 ...can you come out from your hiding and answer or explain any of this? Try parsing it even! (you're really good at that!)
- FBI got a secret warrant to monitor Trump campaign official Carter Page.
- Was spying justified? Doesn’t appear to be!
- What did they find out? Was Page a "national security threat?"
-Mueller Report: no collusion
(true or false boomer?)
-Carter Page: not indicted
(true or false boomer?)
-AND basis for the warrant: the “salacious and unverified” Dossier
(true or false boomer?)
Was anything else submitted to that FISA court?
(true or false boomer?)
Was that dossier verified?
(true or false boomer?)
Was it legal to present it to the court if it wasn't?
(true or false boomer?)
- Is your silence admission you are wrong, too arrogant to admit it, or just a Democrat shill pretending to want honest answers behind all of this illegal "spying"?
Last edited: