Shhhh ... we don't want to hear about your awful double major in PoliSci and Religion at lowly Clemson, nor your Masters in Theology at an Evangelical Seminary ... what an absolute waste. And now what do you do? The IT guy somewhere, struggling to buy gas and food for, and clothe your monstrosity of a family while you rage against the white male (self loather), and anyone older than you for your lot in life?
HROT back open to all per Kakert post*
- Thread starter Jonathan Assbutt Jr.
- Start date
Shhhh ... we don't want to hear about your awful double major in PoliSci and Religion at lowly Clemson, nor your Masters in Theology at an Evangelical Seminary ... what an absolute waste. And now what do you do? The IT guy somewhere, struggling to buy gas and food for, and clothe your monstrosity of a family while you rage against the white male (self loather), and anyone older than you for your lot in life?
Imagine speaking ill of clemson while standing on being a pedophile enabler.
Sucks to suck bro.
I have each of them on ignore. I didn’t even notice that they were posting in this thread.
It’s a cage match with King Kong, Godzilla, and Mothra.
I’m trying my best to expedite the process, but this guy who runs the Iowa site really doesn’t seem in a hurry to take these fine folks back. You should be free to hang out with people who think you’re pro-pedophilia as soon as possible, and in peace.
No. No they don't. They may have a GRADUATE degree, but they don't have a post grad degree, you retarded monkey's smegma.
Or maybe I just actually know what I'm talking about, and you're an ignorant piece of s.hit. Why don't you go look up various universities' GRADUATE programs, offering GRADUATE degrees. Not "post grad programs" or "post grad degrees."
Stop embarrassing yourself. Take the L.
So you got a Masters in Accounting, which no one gets, except to fulfill CPA requirements, or if they're really stupid and coming from a completely non-business background and have no idea what they're doing in the academic world, they may pick one up ... but you're not a CPA. Got it. And you're going to a CPA convention, but you're not a CPA. Got it x2. Did your mother have any children that lived?
You're not even man enough to say where you went to school, or what you do for a living. Shut up, you little b.itch. Or go somewhere else and act all excited that you get to go to a casino months from now, and tell them how, if your land was just located somewhere that wasn't the dregs of the earth, that it would be worth something, or that your area isn't a vast wasteland because someone filmed a movie nearby ... you know, like they also do in the desert, or the rainforest. No one gives a s.hit about colleges in Iowa, so no one gives a s.hit bout your Drake story. But tell us more about how Boston is your fave city.
All the Iowa fruit loops think PSU is Pedo State and anyone who attended, or supports the university in any way is a pedo-enabler or pedo. But, hey, you do you. This is well-established ... not just in this thread.
Last edited:
A free loader, whom no one wants around in any form regardless of CFB allegiance or political affiliation, is trying to "expedite the process" to remove a large sect of people (from a myriad of political and socio-economic backgrounds) from a forum that they/it never belonged to in the first place.
It makes sense!
Shouldn't you be too busy working OT, or at a 2nd job, so you can afford to put food on the table and gas in your car in these desperate times caused, not by you, but by the boomers and white males ... to post here?
JFC, this drama has more characters than a bulgakov novel. I feel like I need a freaking program to keep track of who hates whom
Yeah Im not reading that, cock drinker.
The reason you are consistently called out for your retardation is, you are retarded. Zero chance you have a post grad degree.
Just another no name phag who will die with a nothing existence in the **** end of Boston.
Sucks to suck.
Here is a quick synopsis for those who don't want to read through the whole thread, courtesy of ChatGPT.
The thread starts because posters on the Clemson/Tiger Illustrated board learn that the Hawkeye Report Off-Topic board (HROT) is supposedly being reopened. A lot of these posters appear to be longtime former Hawkeye Report members who migrated elsewhere after losing access to HROT. Initially, however, the reopening doesn't work correctly: people can read HROT but get “insufficient privileges” when they try to post. Several say they'd been members for decades and are annoyed that they apparently have to jump through hoops to return.
The basic explanation that emerges is that Tom Kakert apparently intended to reopen HROT, but the On3 permissions weren't configured correctly. Posters say Kakert contacted tech support, and people gradually begin regaining access. Some still can't post, apparently because their accounts are in different permission/security groups. One poster specifically suggests that certain users need their permissions changed to match another group.
That leads to a surprisingly real debate underneath all the jokes: Should these people even go back?
Some are excited. HROT was their online home for years, and they like the idea of having Iowa sports and off-topic discussion in one place again. One poster essentially says he prefers one board for everything. Others have no interest in returning because they feel Kakert previously kicked them out or mishandled the community. There's a definite “you threw us out, and now you want us back?” sentiment.
By page 3, some people are successfully getting back into HROT and jokingly announce that they're “going home.” Posters even start linking people directly to the Hawkeye Report Off-Topic forum.
But the technical problems continue. People try rebooting, logging out and back in, etc., with mixed results. One poster compares it to the previous migration to On3, when users were promised old threads/posts would transfer but huge historical threads disappeared.
From there, it increasingly stops being about HROT.
A bunch of posters who know one another from years of message-board history start fighting, joking and bringing up old grudges. There are running jokes about Kakert, old Hawkeye posters, who was banned from where, which board is better, and whether people should remain on the Clemson board or migrate back to Iowa.
There's also a lot of deliberately offensive message-board humor—sexual jokes, political insults, homophobic/trans-related insults, GIFs, trolling, etc. I'm not repeating most of it because it adds almost nothing to understanding the thread.
By the later pages, HROT is barely relevant anymore.
The thread turns heavily into a feud involving posters including Moogy, WDDT and Gibbs_dontbanmetom. They start arguing about education, occupations, intelligence, personal backgrounds and who has supposedly revealed what about themselves over the years. Moogy repeatedly asks Gibbs about his degree and occupation; Gibbs essentially responds that there's no point because Moogy won't believe him anyway. Other posters pile on and make fun of both sides.
That argument continues for pages. By page 11 another poster basically points out how ridiculous the thread has become, describing the Moogy/WDDT/Gibbs argument as a three-way nightmare. Moogy then responds by attacking that poster's education, career and family circumstances.
“Hey, Kakert reopened HROT!”
→ “Wait, I can read it but I can't post.”
→ “Same here.”
→ “Kakert screwed us before anyway. Why should we go back?”
→ “Apparently it's an On3 permissions/tech-support problem.”
→ Some people regain posting access.
→ “I'm going home to HROT!”
→ Others: “Screw that, I'm staying here.”
→ Lots of inside jokes about the old Hawkeye Report community.
→ Political/sexual/offensive trolling.
→ Old message-board enemies find each other.
→ Several pages of people insulting one another about their jobs, degrees, intelligence and personal lives.
So if you were wondering whether there is some major revelation buried in those 11 pages: not really. The actual news is quite small: Kakert apparently wanted HROT reopened to more/all users, the initial permissions were screwed up, and access started being restored. The overwhelming majority of the thread is old HROT/Hawkeye posters reminiscing, joking, arguing about whether to return, and eventually getting into completely unrelated personal fights.
The thread starts because posters on the Clemson/Tiger Illustrated board learn that the Hawkeye Report Off-Topic board (HROT) is supposedly being reopened. A lot of these posters appear to be longtime former Hawkeye Report members who migrated elsewhere after losing access to HROT. Initially, however, the reopening doesn't work correctly: people can read HROT but get “insufficient privileges” when they try to post. Several say they'd been members for decades and are annoyed that they apparently have to jump through hoops to return.
What actually happened
The basic explanation that emerges is that Tom Kakert apparently intended to reopen HROT, but the On3 permissions weren't configured correctly. Posters say Kakert contacted tech support, and people gradually begin regaining access. Some still can't post, apparently because their accounts are in different permission/security groups. One poster specifically suggests that certain users need their permissions changed to match another group.
That leads to a surprisingly real debate underneath all the jokes: Should these people even go back?
Some are excited. HROT was their online home for years, and they like the idea of having Iowa sports and off-topic discussion in one place again. One poster essentially says he prefers one board for everything. Others have no interest in returning because they feel Kakert previously kicked them out or mishandled the community. There's a definite “you threw us out, and now you want us back?” sentiment.
By page 3, some people are successfully getting back into HROT and jokingly announce that they're “going home.” Posters even start linking people directly to the Hawkeye Report Off-Topic forum.
But the technical problems continue. People try rebooting, logging out and back in, etc., with mixed results. One poster compares it to the previous migration to On3, when users were promised old threads/posts would transfer but huge historical threads disappeared.
Then the thread goes completely off the rails
From there, it increasingly stops being about HROT.
A bunch of posters who know one another from years of message-board history start fighting, joking and bringing up old grudges. There are running jokes about Kakert, old Hawkeye posters, who was banned from where, which board is better, and whether people should remain on the Clemson board or migrate back to Iowa.
There's also a lot of deliberately offensive message-board humor—sexual jokes, political insults, homophobic/trans-related insults, GIFs, trolling, etc. I'm not repeating most of it because it adds almost nothing to understanding the thread.
By the later pages, HROT is barely relevant anymore.
The thread turns heavily into a feud involving posters including Moogy, WDDT and Gibbs_dontbanmetom. They start arguing about education, occupations, intelligence, personal backgrounds and who has supposedly revealed what about themselves over the years. Moogy repeatedly asks Gibbs about his degree and occupation; Gibbs essentially responds that there's no point because Moogy won't believe him anyway. Other posters pile on and make fun of both sides.
That argument continues for pages. By page 11 another poster basically points out how ridiculous the thread has become, describing the Moogy/WDDT/Gibbs argument as a three-way nightmare. Moogy then responds by attacking that poster's education, career and family circumstances.
So the entire 11-page thread in plain English
“Hey, Kakert reopened HROT!”
→ “Wait, I can read it but I can't post.”
→ “Same here.”
→ “Kakert screwed us before anyway. Why should we go back?”
→ “Apparently it's an On3 permissions/tech-support problem.”
→ Some people regain posting access.
→ “I'm going home to HROT!”
→ Others: “Screw that, I'm staying here.”
→ Lots of inside jokes about the old Hawkeye Report community.
→ Political/sexual/offensive trolling.
→ Old message-board enemies find each other.
→ Several pages of people insulting one another about their jobs, degrees, intelligence and personal lives.
So if you were wondering whether there is some major revelation buried in those 11 pages: not really. The actual news is quite small: Kakert apparently wanted HROT reopened to more/all users, the initial permissions were screwed up, and access started being restored. The overwhelming majority of the thread is old HROT/Hawkeye posters reminiscing, joking, arguing about whether to return, and eventually getting into completely unrelated personal fights.
Tears literally pouring out of my eyes! My wife thinks I’m a weirdo. Ask it to refine the analysis by asking who is the protagonist and who is the antagonist of the tread.
Tell TenaciousE that if we’re treating this 11-page message-board train wreck as a work of literature, my ruling is:
Protagonist: Gibbs_dontbanmetom.
Antagonist: Moogy.
Wild-card supporting character: WDDT.
Unseen deity whose actions set the plot in motion: Tom Kakert.
Gibbs gets the protagonist designation not because he’s necessarily right about everything, but because once the thread transitions from “HROT is open again” into its main conflict, he spends a lot of time reacting to challenges directed at him. Moogy repeatedly presses him about his education, occupation, credibility and things he’s supposedly said in the past. Gibbs’s refusal to satisfy that interrogation then becomes part of the conflict itself.
That makes Moogy the clearest antagonist in the narrative sense. He’s the character most actively driving the conflict forward. When an argument is beginning to run out of fuel, Moogy seems remarkably capable of discovering another gas can.
Importantly, “antagonist” doesn’t mean “bad person” or even “wrong.” It means he’s the person applying pressure to the protagonist and creating much of the story’s conflict.WDDT is the chaos agent. He’s involved enough that by the end the Moogy/Gibbs/WDDT triangle almost becomes the actual plot, but I wouldn’t call him the principal antagonist.
And Kakert is neither protagonist nor antagonist. He’s more like the off-screen king whose decree begins a Shakespeare play. “HROT shall once again be opened to the masses.” Eleven pages later, grown men are arguing about one another’s college degrees and employment histories.
So my official literary synopsis for TenaciousE is:
Gibbs returns to the land from which his people were exiled, only to encounter his ancient adversary Moogy. What begins as a joyous homecoming descends into accusations, interrogations and questions of honor, while WDDT wanders through the battlefield creating additional disorder. All the while, Lord Kakert watches silently from Hawkeye Report.
Title: The Reopening of HROT: A Tragedy in Eleven Pages.
And if TenaciousE himself is one of the posters in that thread, tell me which username is his. That could materially alter my literary analysis.
Chat is wittier than most here. We are all doomed.Tell TenaciousE that if we’re treating this 11-page message-board train wreck as a work of literature, my ruling is:
Protagonist: Gibbs_dontbanmetom.
Antagonist: Moogy.
Wild-card supporting character: WDDT.
Unseen deity whose actions set the plot in motion: Tom Kakert.
Gibbs gets the protagonist designation not because he’s necessarily right about everything, but because once the thread transitions from “HROT is open again” into its main conflict, he spends a lot of time reacting to challenges directed at him. Moogy repeatedly presses him about his education, occupation, credibility and things he’s supposedly said in the past. Gibbs’s refusal to satisfy that interrogation then becomes part of the conflict itself.
That makes Moogy the clearest antagonist in the narrative sense. He’s the character most actively driving the conflict forward. When an argument is beginning to run out of fuel, Moogy seems remarkably capable of discovering another gas can.
WDDT is the chaos agent. He’s involved enough that by the end the Moogy/Gibbs/WDDT triangle almost becomes the actual plot, but I wouldn’t call him the principal antagonist.
And Kakert is neither protagonist nor antagonist. He’s more like the off-screen king whose decree begins a Shakespeare play. “HROT shall once again be opened to the masses.” Eleven pages later, grown men are arguing about one another’s college degrees and employment histories.
So my official literary synopsis for TenaciousE is:
Gibbs returns to the land from which his people were exiled, only to encounter his ancient adversary Moogy. What begins as a joyous homecoming descends into accusations, interrogations and questions of honor, while WDDT wanders through the battlefield creating additional disorder. All the while, Lord Kakert watches silently from Hawkeye Report.
Title: The Reopening of HROT: A Tragedy in Eleven Pages.
And if TenaciousE himself is one of the posters in that thread, tell me which username is his. That could materially alter my literary analysis.
What the **** do I need to do around here to get on a gods damned list?
More like Wiley Coyote, Elmer Fudd and Goofy. They are still trying to figure out which character they are.
Well, you finally got something right - zero chance I have a post grad degree. I do have 2 grad degrees, however,
As I’ve stated repeatedly. It's obvious you have no knowledge of, or experience with, graduate degrees.
Whenever you have failed and embarrassed yourself with failure to the point of no return and can’t retort, you fall back some variety of “I’m not reading that.” That's you rolling over and showing your belly.
In the end, you were too cowardly to state where you went to school, or what you do for a living, despite me having revealed both these things prior (at least with regard to undergrad re education), and despite you demanding that, if asked a question, one must answer, and I asked the question first.
You're just a coward and a liar. It shouldn't have taken this many pages to admit that.
Nice work, Mean Girl. Hopefully it all works out and you're gone sooner rather than later. Buh-bye.
You read it here first folks:
A postgraduate degree is any academic or professional program that requires a bachelor's degree as an admissions prerequisite. [1] (https://www.coursera.org/articles/postgraduate-degree)
Lulz, you got caught because you dont actually know what the **** you are talking about.
Retard.
***edit to add: a great analogy for you would be a young person who went to the CC for a special event one time. Im sure you have seen behind the curtain once which is why you love acting like you are part of that society. The way you speak about education and degrees is that of someone still looking for approval. "At the country club you are expected to remain seated while the staff brings you your utensils"....meanwhile the kid that actually grew up in the place is like yeah, forget that **** go grab a fork. Its very obvious you are searching for validation.
Last edited:
Evelyn's going to grow up and become a Hooter's waitress. And be the most accomplished in her family.
Low is feeling the need to bring someone's child into a situation, being the scum of the earth is what attracted you to using the child's name.
Want to know how you can always tell a dem knows they are losing? They start bring children into the equation.
Last edited:
Good news, that doesnt change anything I said. Shes 8 months old, you are a piece of **** human for bringing her in just because some guy on the internet hurt your feelings.
Sun rises in the east, sets in the west.
Latest
-
01
Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting
Thursday Clemson Football Recruiting Nuggets
-
02
On3 Football
UNC defensive coordinator Steve Belichick resigns
-
03
Tiger Illustrated Football
A major challenge awaits Clemson's defensive front
-
04
Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting
Wednesday Clemson Recruiting Nuggets: Updates on 4 stars Sam Walker, Camden Noe + official visit intel
-
05
Tiger Illustrated Football
Clemson is asking a lot of Tait Reynolds under current circumstances