Mueller's grabbing the low hanging fruit at this point, which there is always plenty of it to find in Washington.
But collusion... not likely at all.... but we'll spend the next 2 years learning that as well.
Hey Trumpsters
- Thread starter countryroads89_rivals
- Start date
Mueller's grabbing the low hanging fruit at this point, which there is always plenty of it to find in Washington.
But collusion... not likely at all.... but we'll spend the next 2 years learning that as well.
That ***** going to be over a lot sooner than you think. We likely won’t be talking about Mueller in Jan. It’ll be another in a long line of punchlines.
Way to duck and dodge. I knew people wouldn't answer. That answer was pure THE and ATL by the way.....don't answer the question but bring up Hillary instead. I said before the election that I didn't like Clinton and that I only was voting for her because she ran against Trump. I never waived from that position.
You wing nutz are all the same......supporting corruption, partisan politics, and boorish behavior as long as the perpetrator is conservative.
You are fine with ending the investigation if he has enough evidence to indict many?
If he had the evidence, he’d indict them. You’re speculating and hoping for an outcome that doesn’t seem likely.
If he has the evidence, I support an indictments of whoever.
It depends on what it is. If it's allegedly obstruction over the non-existent Russia case, or Comey's firing, and absolutely NOTHING comes from the administration as far as conspiracy with the Russians, I couldn't care less about it, as you shouldn't either.
Other's would be a case by case basis. You can't get an open ended hypothetical and expect the answer you want to hear.
Must be tough when everybody has heard you shout fire and knowing it's a lie, but thats how it is when you are a zebra,,,,
The next Trump family reunion might be a bit contentious. The New York Times has revealed that its bombshell story about Donald Trump engaging in “dubious” tax schemes and “outright” fraud to increase his inheritance from his parents’ wealth came about because of a filing made by his federal judge sister. Journalist Susanne Craig said she found the disclosure form Maryanne Trump Barry filed as part of her Senate confirmation hearing. It showed a $1 million contribution from an obscure family-owned company: All County Building Supply & Maintenance. “‘What the heck?’” Craig remembered thinking, leading her to talk to people who detailed Fred Trump’s dubious method of moving cash from his companies to his children. The Times describes Maryanne Trump Barry’s filing as a “central finding” of the story.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/filing-by-trumps-federal-judge-sister-led-to-nyt-tax-fraud-expose
https://www.thedailybeast.com/filing-by-trumps-federal-judge-sister-led-to-nyt-tax-fraud-expose
Last edited:
Odd you would be so happy about a story pointing out that Trump and his family are much wealthier than he claimed since it was just recently you guaranteed this very board that Trump had vastly overstated his wealth.
Its line you look firward to provibg your own ignorance.
I might be wrong on this, but I think large $$ gifts to children were ok with tax law at one time. The law was revised to limit this in the 80s I think. No, don’t know dates or where I was at the time so this should not be accepted at face value. I’m ok with that.
Two minutes after he posts and you rush in to declare him wrong while your soy sipping buddies on here have thousands of posts that are incorrect dating back the past 3 years and you haven't touched any of them. No wonder why so many on here think you are gay.