@Airport The Justice Department, which includes the FBI, is under the control of leftist bureaucrats. The FBI has major influence on local policing.
There is no fear of being caught doing corrupt things. That's why we have to get rid of qualified immunity.Cops and the FBI agents should be fired . If prosecutors new what fbi was doing they need fired and disbarred.
100% correct. No fear in getting caught. I've said before on here lawyers and politicians should always get double the punishment and cops should to. They was caught red handed and should receive the maximum penalty plus. Qualified immunity shouldn't even be in play here . Could be wrongThere is no fear of being caught doing corrupt things. That's why we have to get rid of qualified immunity.
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it.--Lord Acton
Law enforcement typically do not get charged. Often, they are only held accountable through civil litigation. When a suit is brought forward police will claim qualified immunity. Lower federal courts often grant summary judgment on the qualified immunity grounds. It's difficult to get the case heard on appeal. Therefore, lawyers are reticent to take cases knowing even if all the facts are on their side, qualified immunity will keep them from a favorable judgment.100% correct. No fear in getting caught. I've said before on here lawyers and politicians should always get double the punishment and cops should to. They was caught red handed and should receive the maximum penalty plus. Qualified immunity shouldn't even be in play here . Could be wrong
Law enforcement typically do not get charged. Often, they are only held accountable through civil litigation. When a suit is brought forward police will claim qualified immunity. Lower federal courts often grant summary judgment on the qualified immunity grounds. It's difficult to get the case heard on appeal. Therefore, lawyers are reticent to take cases knowing even if all the facts are on their side, qualified immunity will keep them from a favorable judgment.
If firing is their only consequence it's not much of a punishment. They'll have a job the next day.Getting a search warrant isn't hard. They need to answer for why they searched the house without one. Then start with firing them.
If firing is their only consequence it's not much of a punishment. They'll have a job the next day.
I don't know any Sherriff that would hire them. Pretty serious allegation if true. If they didn't have probable cause to enter the house that's bad enough. Searching it in detail adds to it.
They need charged with breaking and entering then the punishment doubleIf firing is their only consequence it's not much of a punishment. They'll have a job the next day.
They need charged with breaking and entering then the punishment double
that's bad for sure.There is no fear of being caught doing corrupt things. That's why we have to get rid of qualified immunity.
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it.--Lord