I'd have no problem defending that...I'd love to be the attorney that is hired ....this is just an attempt to harass [FONT=Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]....the first thing I would do is get a change of venue. Because RR filed and not the owner individually, I'd move this to federal court. Because they do business over the Internet, (interstate commerce) and the defendents are in different states, this certainly meets the criteria. [/FONT]
orchestrated this whole thing, including Miller.
It almost feels like a commercial for his business. You know a lot of the local mouth breathers will go buy an extra baby blue Columbia shirt just to show their solidarity.
I'd have no problem defending that...I'd love to be the attorney that is hired ....this is just an attempt to harass ....the first thing I would do is get a change of venue. Because RR filed and not the owner individually, I'd move this to federal court. Because they do business over the Internet, (interstate commerce) and the defendents are in different states, this certainly meets the criteria.
Matt works for Richard Cross...so there is that."Yeah State fans are thinking differently derp derp!", considering the lawsuit and all the "snickers" we've had over the investigation...
So we're supposed to be worried about this lawsuit? As if it's gonna bring down State? Good Lord...
Could Hugh, Barney, and others be deposed in this case?
Sorry, but the case is not removable to federal court. You have a MS LLC plaintiff and MS defendants. No diversity of citizenship.
Sorry, but the case is not removable to federal court. You have a MS LLC plaintiff and MS defendants. No diversity of citizenship.
Bullet point #2 on the first page of the lawsuit says otherwise.
"2. Defendant Lindsey Miller is a resident citizen of the state of Georgia..."
Bullet point #2 on the first page of the lawsuit says otherwise.
"2. Defendant Lindsey Miller is a resident citizen of the state of Georgia..."
Could Hugh, Barney, and others be deposed in this case?
That's not how it works. There has to be complete diversity of citizenship, meaning none of the defendants can be a resident of the same state as the plaintiff. It only takes one defendant to destroy diversity. Here you have 2 MS resident defendants and a MS plaintiff. So it's not removable.
Ahem. Federal question? And don't say there isn't potentially one.
Maroon and White Basketball
Bulldogs prepare to level up competition, starting with Xavier in neutral site meeting
Maroon and White Football
Mississippi State Week 11 Preview: Who carries the load?
Maroon and White Football
Mississippi State Week 11 Preview: Run vs. Run
Maroon and White Basketball
Mississippi State 79-57 Troy: Bulldogs build big early lead in home win over Trojans
Maroon and White Football
Kamario Taylor speaks on return to Mississippi State for 2027