As pointed out to you before, what does it say about a HC that has a 4-8 season with a loss to Kansas in his 3rd year? Were you fellating Dana then? The reason everyone is giving you a hard time is only a handful of rare coaches hit a Power 5 school and have a good season out of the gate without having already been within the program. There is little evidence of Brown's coaching prowess as he has 1 game under his belt. Dana had 8 seasons worth of evidence and it showed that he didn't have what it takes to get WVU in position to maybe win the Big 12 at all. No one is anointing Brown as the greatest coach ever or even a better overall head coach than Dana. You on the other hand are saying that Brown is going to be a worse coach than Dana without evidence while falsely believing WVU would be in contention with DH at the helm this year despite the objective evidence proving otherwise. Give Brown a chance and I'll be right there with you trashing his coaching skills if WVU is going 4-8 in his third season ... like DH did.
You, and others bashed DH every year. Didn't matter if he won 10 games and crushed Clemson, or went 4-8, or contended for the BIG 12. BASH BASH BASH.
Now a new coach is on board, and not only are you giving him a pass for a sloppy very poor outing in WVUs first game this year, some are actually trying to blame Holgorsen for it.
This is the epitome of HYPOCRISY.
You don't get a pass after bashing the previous coach every year he was at WVU.
BTW, WVU hasn't joined a new conference, and Brown wasn't left with a dearth of talent like Holgorsen was. Brown chased off half the team he inherited and we'll likely see the results this year.
Some are celebrating a predicted 3 or 4 win season, while still roasting the previous coach (one of the best ever at WVU). HYPOCRITES.