Have a Question?

Sporty

Senior
Jul 4, 2007
2,622
638
113
In all seriousness, should it not be a quicker acclimation to a new defense than a new offense? Especially when according to this board our OL is putrid? Our new offense is getting close to being very very good, play calling withstanding .

Our defense seems to be clueless as soon as the other team is able to make adjustments!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ewooc
Aug 18, 2016
16,630
10,905
113
In all seriousness, should it not be a quicker acclimation to a new defense than a new offense? Especially when according to this board our OL is putrid? Our new offense is getting close to being very very good, play calling withstanding .

Our defense seems to be clueless as soon as the other team is able to make adjustments!

The defense is getting better in the base defense. You haven't seen as many busts and blown assignments the past couple of weeks when they are in base. Where they are getting into trouble is when they are forced out of base in order to match up against certain formations. That is when they aren't able to make the necessary calls, or they miss their key, or read the wrong key. That will get better going forward.

I disagree that the offense is getting close to being very very good. It is also getting better no doubt. I haven't put pen to paper yet, but I would bet that a good chunk of the offensive production is in the 2nd half or after the outcome has been decided. They do not start the game off as well as I believe they should. The total offense numbers make the O look better than it is. IMHO
 

Sporty

Senior
Jul 4, 2007
2,622
638
113
Understand what you are saying but disagree .. Only two of the six games have been "out-of-hand". So that does not explain the offensive output!
 
Aug 18, 2016
16,630
10,905
113
Understand what you are saying but disagree .. Only two of the six games have been "out-of-hand". So that does not explain the offensive output!

In all but Colorado and Northwestern, Nebraska was down by at least 17 points late in the first half or at halftime. So while the final outcomes may not have been out of hand, the offensive production came after teams had gotten out to fairly substantial leads.

Do we think Northwestern's offense was great the last 3 minutes of the game or was the defense playing poorly and perhaps a little overconfident.

Again, I am not saying there hasn't been any improvement, just that the offense starts slow, the team gets behind, the offense does better in the 2nd half, against teams with bigger leads.

Looks like this

1st half - offense struggles, defense on the field a lot, defense wears down a bit, opponents score

2nd half - offense has more success, defense not on the field as much, defense holds opponents to less points, score looks respectable in the end.
 

DeadRed402

Sophomore
Oct 6, 2018
162
124
0
In this defense, an athletic field side backer and middle backer are paramount. The lack of speed makes spread sets with 3+ receivers very difficult for our defense in it's current state. Currently teams can get a lot of good matchups on us. Dedrick young is pretty awful in space
 
  • Like
Reactions: cvogele29

dand84

All-Conference
Oct 28, 2017
3,429
1,844
0
I think the offense is closer. But I think the offense simply has better skill position players. At times, they look good, but at times they don't. I think the "don't" part is mainly the QB playing like a true freshman and trying to make things happen and an OLine that lacks enough talent and/or time in this system. We are putting up close to 500 yards per game. That is good enough to win if they start converting some of that to points. We leave a ton of points on the floor every game.

The defense seriously lacks talent and especially depth. The defense is not as bad as it seems for the talent they do have. The penalties and missed assignments are really causing serious problems because they are happening at key times in the game and leading to scores. I don't think the secondary is nearly as bad as it seems (although it can be bad) but they are exposed more than necessary because we are unable to pressure the QB on D.

The thing that gets me is that the team as a whole doesn't have a good span of play at the same time. Either one unit or the other fails. Heck, I'm more concerned with special teams play. Atrocious.

So I don't think they are good this year, but I honestly don't believe they are as bad as 0-6. I thought a lot less of last years 4-8 team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: saluno22
Aug 18, 2016
16,630
10,905
113
Here are a few offensive stats I threw together.



in the 1st half through 6 games

118 rush attempts 586 yards 5 TDs - 4.97 ypc
97 pass attempts 586 yards 2 TDs 2 INT = 6.04 ypa

in the 2nd half through 6 games

124 rush attempts 570 yards 5 TDs - 4.57 ypc
104 pass attempts 901 yards 6 TDs 4 INT - 8.66 ypa

7 1st half TDs
11 2nd half TDs

5.45 ypp in 1st half
6.45 ypp in 2nd half

1 TD every 30 plays in 1st half
1 TD every 20 plays in 2nd half
 
  • Like
Reactions: saluno22

dand84

All-Conference
Oct 28, 2017
3,429
1,844
0
Thanks for the stats. Doing better in the 2nd half either by settling down in some cases or the opponent is chewing up more clock and playing more conservatively on defense. Number of opponent plays and TOP per half might be interesting.
 
Aug 18, 2016
16,630
10,905
113
Thanks for the stats. Doing better in the 2nd half either by settling down in some cases or the opponent is chewing up more clock and playing more conservatively on defense. Number of opponent plays and TOP per half might be interesting.

I can't break down the TOP by half - but based on the numbers, the opponent is not playing more conservatively on offense, which is different than I expected.

110 rushes 537 yards - 9 TDs
105 passes 669 yards - 4 TDs

112 rushes 669 yards - 6 TDs
127 passes 941 yards - 6 TDs
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnRossEwing

Sporty

Senior
Jul 4, 2007
2,622
638
113
I believe if you take the Michigan stats out alone you will find the 2nd half stats are more against your statement but that is just surmising on my part possibly.
 

dand84

All-Conference
Oct 28, 2017
3,429
1,844
0
Well, without being scientific, the 2nd halves of last year are not the same as this year so far. That seems obvious to me. Still running about a 55/45 run/pass ratio which I think is a good sign. Just getting more pass yards per play in the 2nd half.

More interesting to me is the number of drive killing turnovers and penalties (same for defense with drive extending plays and penalties). This team is leaving a lot of points on the floor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sporty

saluno22

All-Conference
Mar 1, 2006
8,043
2,379
0
I can't break down the TOP by half - but based on the numbers, the opponent is not playing more conservatively on offense, which is different than I expected.

110 rushes 537 yards - 9 TDs
105 passes 669 yards - 4 TDs

112 rushes 669 yards - 6 TDs
127 passes 941 yards - 6 TDs
TOP by half found on page 6 of each link...

08 Sep vs. Colorado
1st half NU: 17:20
1st half OPP: 12:40
2nd half NU: 12:25
2nd half OPP: 17:35

15 Sep vs. Troy
1st half NU: 16:57
1st half OPP: 13:03
2nd half NU: 15:57
2nd half OPP: 14:03

22 Sep at Michigan
1st half NU: 10:58
1st half OPP: 19:02
2nd half NU: 13:33
2nd half OPP: 16:27

29 Sep vs. Purdue
1st half NU: 12:19
1st half OPP: 17:41
2nd half NU: 11:25
2nd half OPP: 18:35

06 Oct at Wisconsin
1st half NU: 10:52
1st half OPP: 19:08
2nd half NU: 13:35
2nd half OPP: 16:25

13 Oct at Northwestern
1st half NU: 15:29
1st half OPP: 14:31
2nd half NU: 14:38
2nd half OPP: 15:22

We've "won" TOP in 4 of 12 halves. And a couple of those were because our opponents scored on special teams (Troy) or had short fields (Colorado).
 

BIGBallllller

Redshirt
Oct 15, 2018
3
1
0
In all seriousness, should it not be a quicker acclimation to a new defense than a new offense? Especially when according to this board our OL is putrid? Our new offense is getting close to being very very good, play calling withstanding .

Our defense seems to be clueless as soon as the other team is able to make adjustments!

When the coach doesn’t know what he’s doing it could go either way