Harper

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
And I am allowed to laugh at you but your comments weren’t the complete brainless comments that I am laughing at. Many only show up after a loss. Same cast of characters ready to whine like babies when we lose and a lot of silence when we win and our star players play well.

Your comments are more of the grass is greener variety which many fans fall into that trap. Blame the QB. Blame the leading scorer. Etc. I talk to fans of opposing teams and they think RHJ is elite. They wish they had him on their team. Grass is always greener.
Who are these Rutgers fans that don't want him on the team? I've never met one
 

anon1753890747

All-Conference
Sep 29, 2006
3,891
3,679
72
They ARE THE TALENT. They're experienced seniors and been through the league several times. Its a team built around them. And Cliff is a pretty speculator talent + you have a defensive player of the year candidate on the court. There's more than enough talent out there. We're lacking consistency. And especially when we have TWO guys so you can't even argue its like the Corey Sanders or Myles Mack days where they had nobody there. We have two guys , who if they both played consistently would be All-Big Ten 2nd team. Which is VERY difficult to do.

If either had true professional ambitions, gotta be consistent. Your down nights have to be 10 points each. The good nights are 20+. We've now played 5 league games. And 40% of the games our top two guys were no-shows. And they've each had several no shows in non-conf games against far inferior talent.

Love them. And respect them. And huge fans. But there's gotta be a fire and a killer inside of you to find ways to score when jump shots aren't going in.
Great take
 

NewJerseyHawk

Heisman
Jan 11, 2007
24,458
38,752
113
Another mindless thread....

Let's put it this way, since fans appear to somehow looking to Harper or Baker.

A) The two players in past years, had bad shooting nights OR missed games altogether and RU was still OK

B) The Harper/Baker combo shot 5/21 from the floor.....obviously not good.....but the final score or margin was 17 points....maybe it could have been 11 or 13 or 14.....

If they shot 10/21 combined, which is practically 50% and if 3 of those 5 additional shots were 3s, that's 9 points for the 3s....and 4 points for the 2s.....that's still 13 points when RU lost by 17.

Not a math guy, but a normal or good game from both and RU still loses by 4?? How does the original poster, start with Harper and Baker??

Where was Mulcahy......Cliff scored 12 points....what about Caleb, the other starter.....

What about players off the bench....Hyatt missed 2 threes in the last minute when the game was decided, prior to that he was 1 of 5....but he at least took the ball to the hoop and drew 2 fouls and earned 4 FT....he made 2 of the 4...

The bottom line is to the stats, you have Paul Mulcahy playing 30 minutes a game and averaging 6.7PPG.....Paul didn't score until there were 5 minutes left in the game, when it was apparent, he relapsed into inconsistent, passive Paul.....the Mulcahy who passes up wide open lanes, doesn't pump fake or draw enough fouls.....who teams consistently leave open and Mulcahy still isn't taking those shots.

The issue, is not asking/demanding Harper and Baker to carry Mulcahy, carry a bench of inconsistent scorers and carry teams on the road.

The issue from a strictly numbers game.....look at the stats vs per minutes played.

Should a player playing 30 minutes a game, average 6PPG.....

If Jacob Young played 30 minutes, would he average 6.7PPG......Nope....he averaged around 12 to 13 last year in those same amount of minutes.....

If Montez Mathis averaged 30 MPG, would he average 6.7PPG......Nope, he averaged more per minutes played than that, and would be in double figures as well......

If you look at the "Points per Minutes played"....

Hyatt is averaging 6PPG in 16 or 17 minutes a game.....common sense or high probability, is if he played 30 minutes, would he still be stuck at 6PPG....Nope.....he also would be around 12 PPG....

If Mag plays 30 MPG, I have a high confidence level, he would not average just 6.7PPG......he also would likely scrap his way to double figures per game......

Let's be objective and factual about what we are watching.....the issue should not be asking RHJ to shoot 50% from the field 20 out of 20 B1G games and average 20PPG....it should not ask Baker to shoot 50% from the field, 40% from 3, and average 16 to 18PPG....

Are we as fans allergic to why Mulcahy, as a starting junior and experienced player, who knows our system, can't pick up the slack?? Why is his lack of production, somehow ignored....??

Let me leave out the defense Mulcahy kinda doesn't play that well.....not his fault, he's not a great athlete.....but if his man constantly outscored what Mulcahy generates, why does that fall on Harper and Baker???

Fire away.....I'm here for the discussion......
 

DHajekRC84

Heisman
Aug 9, 2001
30,709
19,818
0
Yeah don’t waste your time trying to convince me. I know who 1984 is and think you should convince him because he could score 30 any time he wants. It has to be a computer simulated game but he’s straight fire!
I doubt it. I don't play computer games. I'd foul out in 5 mins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yeah Baby

bethlehemfan

Heisman
Sep 6, 2003
15,112
16,398
113
Another mindless thread....

Let's put it this way, since fans appear to somehow looking to Harper or Baker.

A) The two players in past years, had bad shooting nights OR missed games altogether and RU was still OK

B) The Harper/Baker combo shot 5/21 from the floor.....obviously not good.....but the final score or margin was 17 points....maybe it could have been 11 or 13 or 14.....

If they shot 10/21 combined, which is practically 50% and if 3 of those 5 additional shots were 3s, that's 9 points for the 3s....and 4 points for the 2s.....that's still 13 points when RU lost by 17.

Not a math guy, but a normal or good game from both and RU still loses by 4?? How does the original poster, start with Harper and Baker??

Where was Mulcahy......Cliff scored 12 points....what about Caleb, the other starter.....

What about players off the bench....Hyatt missed 2 threes in the last minute when the game was decided, prior to that he was 1 of 5....but he at least took the ball to the hoop and drew 2 fouls and earned 4 FT....he made 2 of the 4...

The bottom line is to the stats, you have Paul Mulcahy playing 30 minutes a game and averaging 6.7PPG.....Paul didn't score until there were 5 minutes left in the game, when it was apparent, he relapsed into inconsistent, passive Paul.....the Mulcahy who passes up wide open lanes, doesn't pump fake or draw enough fouls.....who teams consistently leave open and Mulcahy still isn't taking those shots.

The issue, is not asking/demanding Harper and Baker to carry Mulcahy, carry a bench of inconsistent scorers and carry teams on the road.

The issue from a strictly numbers game.....look at the stats vs per minutes played.

Should a player playing 30 minutes a game, average 6PPG.....

If Jacob Young played 30 minutes, would he average 6.7PPG......Nope....he averaged around 12 to 13 last year in those same amount of minutes.....

If Montez Mathis averaged 30 MPG, would he average 6.7PPG......Nope, he averaged more per minutes played than that, and would be in double figures as well......

If you look at the "Points per Minutes played"....

Hyatt is averaging 6PPG in 16 or 17 minutes a game.....common sense or high probability, is if he played 30 minutes, would he still be stuck at 6PPG....Nope.....he also would be around 12 PPG....

If Mag plays 30 MPG, I have a high confidence level, he would not average just 6.7PPG......he also would likely scrap his way to double figures per game......

Let's be objective and factual about what we are watching.....the issue should not be asking RHJ to shoot 50% from the field 20 out of 20 B1G games and average 20PPG....it should not ask Baker to shoot 50% from the field, 40% from 3, and average 16 to 18PPG....

Are we as fans allergic to why Mulcahy, as a starting junior and experienced player, who knows our system, can't pick up the slack?? Why is his lack of production, somehow ignored....??

Let me leave out the defense Mulcahy kinda doesn't play that well.....not his fault, he's not a great athlete.....but if his man constantly outscored what Mulcahy generates, why does that fall on Harper and Baker???

Fire away.....I'm here for the discussion......
You seem predisposed to single out mulcahy. He is not the star of the team. Everyone save cliff stunk and yet you are focused on mulcahy. It’s weird. Harp and Geo are the senior leaders. As they go RU goes. Not hard to figure out. They started out like 0-7 or something. They set the tone with a terrible lackluster performance. Why wouldn’t people be focused on that? Mathis and Young are no longer with the program btw.
 

DHajekRC84

Heisman
Aug 9, 2001
30,709
19,818
0
Another mindless thread....

Let's put it this way, since fans appear to somehow looking to Harper or Baker.

A) The two players in past years, had bad shooting nights OR missed games altogether and RU was still OK

B) The Harper/Baker combo shot 5/21 from the floor.....obviously not good.....but the final score or margin was 17 points....maybe it could have been 11 or 13 or 14.....

If they shot 10/21 combined, which is practically 50% and if 3 of those 5 additional shots were 3s, that's 9 points for the 3s....and 4 points for the 2s.....that's still 13 points when RU lost by 17.

Not a math guy, but a normal or good game from both and RU still loses by 4?? How does the original poster, start with Harper and Baker??

Where was Mulcahy......Cliff scored 12 points....what about Caleb, the other starter.....

What about players off the bench....Hyatt missed 2 threes in the last minute when the game was decided, prior to that he was 1 of 5....but he at least took the ball to the hoop and drew 2 fouls and earned 4 FT....he made 2 of the 4...

The bottom line is to the stats, you have Paul Mulcahy playing 30 minutes a game and averaging 6.7PPG.....Paul didn't score until there were 5 minutes left in the game, when it was apparent, he relapsed into inconsistent, passive Paul.....the Mulcahy who passes up wide open lanes, doesn't pump fake or draw enough fouls.....who teams consistently leave open and Mulcahy still isn't taking those shots.

The issue, is not asking/demanding Harper and Baker to carry Mulcahy, carry a bench of inconsistent scorers and carry teams on the road.

The issue from a strictly numbers game.....look at the stats vs per minutes played.

Should a player playing 30 minutes a game, average 6PPG.....

If Jacob Young played 30 minutes, would he average 6.7PPG......Nope....he averaged around 12 to 13 last year in those same amount of minutes.....

If Montez Mathis averaged 30 MPG, would he average 6.7PPG......Nope, he averaged more per minutes played than that, and would be in double figures as well......

If you look at the "Points per Minutes played"....

Hyatt is averaging 6PPG in 16 or 17 minutes a game.....common sense or high probability, is if he played 30 minutes, would he still be stuck at 6PPG....Nope.....he also would be around 12 PPG....

If Mag plays 30 MPG, I have a high confidence level, he would not average just 6.7PPG......he also would likely scrap his way to double figures per game......

Let's be objective and factual about what we are watching.....the issue should not be asking RHJ to shoot 50% from the field 20 out of 20 B1G games and average 20PPG....it should not ask Baker to shoot 50% from the field, 40% from 3, and average 16 to 18PPG....

Are we as fans allergic to why Mulcahy, as a starting junior and experienced player, who knows our system, can't pick up the slack?? Why is his lack of production, somehow ignored....??

Let me leave out the defense Mulcahy kinda doesn't play that well.....not his fault, he's not a great athlete.....but if his man constantly outscored what Mulcahy generates, why does that fall on Harper and Baker???

Fire away.....I'm here for the discussion......
You've been apologizing for Geos inconsistent performance For 4 years since he was a sophomore so why should that stop now.

This Convo. Wasn't about the non captains...there's certainly plenty to be concerned about there.

I've shared data in the past that you've completely ignored because we'll i don't know. But I know I'm not into war and peace exchanges with you. As a rule I don't read posts over 75 words.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Scangg

Danprusa_4

All-Conference
Aug 29, 2018
1,678
1,283
0
I agree, but it's more than that. Harper has to play his game from inside/out, not outside/in as he has been doing. He is far more difficult to guard on the inside; I just don't know what he hasn't learned to do this. He should be getting 10 points a game from the inside and the foul line.
Totally agree. You’re points are all valid and I do think Harper needs to get to the paint more and draw more fouls and be tougher. I do think he had some good inside looks against PSU he just couldn’t convert.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

Corycord1

All-Conference
Apr 19, 2017
874
1,562
93
And I am allowed to laugh at you but your comments weren’t the complete brainless comments that I am laughing at. Many only show up after a loss. Same cast of characters ready to whine like babies when we lose and a lot of silence when we win and our star players play well.

Your comments are more of the grass is greener variety which many fans fall into that trap. Blame the QB. Blame the leading scorer. Etc. I talk to fans of opposing teams and they think RHJ is elite. They wish they had him on their team. Grass is always greener.
When did I say I wish we didn’t have Harper on our team? All I’m saying is that Harper has had too many games throughout his career where he hasn’t shown up. You don’t see that from other stars around the league. We don’t have the talent to overcome when he doesn’t have it.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Another mindless thread....

Let's put it this way, since fans appear to somehow looking to Harper or Baker.

A) The two players in past years, had bad shooting nights OR missed games altogether and RU was still OK

B) The Harper/Baker combo shot 5/21 from the floor.....obviously not good.....but the final score or margin was 17 points....maybe it could have been 11 or 13 or 14.....

If they shot 10/21 combined, which is practically 50% and if 3 of those 5 additional shots were 3s, that's 9 points for the 3s....and 4 points for the 2s.....that's still 13 points when RU lost by 17.

Not a math guy, but a normal or good game from both and RU still loses by 4?? How does the original poster, start with Harper and Baker??

Where was Mulcahy......Cliff scored 12 points....what about Caleb, the other starter.....

What about players off the bench....Hyatt missed 2 threes in the last minute when the game was decided, prior to that he was 1 of 5....but he at least took the ball to the hoop and drew 2 fouls and earned 4 FT....he made 2 of the 4...

The bottom line is to the stats, you have Paul Mulcahy playing 30 minutes a game and averaging 6.7PPG.....Paul didn't score until there were 5 minutes left in the game, when it was apparent, he relapsed into inconsistent, passive Paul.....the Mulcahy who passes up wide open lanes, doesn't pump fake or draw enough fouls.....who teams consistently leave open and Mulcahy still isn't taking those shots.

The issue, is not asking/demanding Harper and Baker to carry Mulcahy, carry a bench of inconsistent scorers and carry teams on the road.

The issue from a strictly numbers game.....look at the stats vs per minutes played.

Should a player playing 30 minutes a game, average 6PPG.....

If Jacob Young played 30 minutes, would he average 6.7PPG......Nope....he averaged around 12 to 13 last year in those same amount of minutes.....

If Montez Mathis averaged 30 MPG, would he average 6.7PPG......Nope, he averaged more per minutes played than that, and would be in double figures as well......

If you look at the "Points per Minutes played"....

Hyatt is averaging 6PPG in 16 or 17 minutes a game.....common sense or high probability, is if he played 30 minutes, would he still be stuck at 6PPG....Nope.....he also would be around 12 PPG....

If Mag plays 30 MPG, I have a high confidence level, he would not average just 6.7PPG......he also would likely scrap his way to double figures per game......

Let's be objective and factual about what we are watching.....the issue should not be asking RHJ to shoot 50% from the field 20 out of 20 B1G games and average 20PPG....it should not ask Baker to shoot 50% from the field, 40% from 3, and average 16 to 18PPG....

Are we as fans allergic to why Mulcahy, as a starting junior and experienced player, who knows our system, can't pick up the slack?? Why is his lack of production, somehow ignored....??

Let me leave out the defense Mulcahy kinda doesn't play that well.....not his fault, he's not a great athlete.....but if his man constantly outscored what Mulcahy generates, why does that fall on Harper and Baker???

Fire away.....I'm here for the discussion......
There are some flaws in this argument... Geo and Harper's roles are as scorers. Not everyone is. When they are off, it forces others to try to do more and force it. If Geo and Harper are having good shooting nights it opens things up for everyone. Easier shots. Better offensive rhythm. Less pressure. They are leaders. They set the tone. All of these things matter and have a big impact
 
  • Like
Reactions: DHajekRC84

RU84

All-Conference
May 6, 2003
1,477
1,377
48
Another mindless thread....

Let's put it this way, since fans appear to somehow looking to Harper or Baker.

A) The two players in past years, had bad shooting nights OR missed games altogether and RU was still OK

B) The Harper/Baker combo shot 5/21 from the floor.....obviously not good.....but the final score or margin was 17 points....maybe it could have been 11 or 13 or 14.....

If they shot 10/21 combined, which is practically 50% and if 3 of those 5 additional shots were 3s, that's 9 points for the 3s....and 4 points for the 2s.....that's still 13 points when RU lost by 17.

Not a math guy, but a normal or good game from both and RU still loses by 4?? How does the original poster, start with Harper and Baker??

Where was Mulcahy......Cliff scored 12 points....what about Caleb, the other starter.....

What about players off the bench....Hyatt missed 2 threes in the last minute when the game was decided, prior to that he was 1 of 5....but he at least took the ball to the hoop and drew 2 fouls and earned 4 FT....he made 2 of the 4...

The bottom line is to the stats, you have Paul Mulcahy playing 30 minutes a game and averaging 6.7PPG.....Paul didn't score until there were 5 minutes left in the game, when it was apparent, he relapsed into inconsistent, passive Paul.....the Mulcahy who passes up wide open lanes, doesn't pump fake or draw enough fouls.....who teams consistently leave open and Mulcahy still isn't taking those shots.

The issue, is not asking/demanding Harper and Baker to carry Mulcahy, carry a bench of inconsistent scorers and carry teams on the road.

The issue from a strictly numbers game.....look at the stats vs per minutes played.

Should a player playing 30 minutes a game, average 6PPG.....

If Jacob Young played 30 minutes, would he average 6.7PPG......Nope....he averaged around 12 to 13 last year in those same amount of minutes.....

If Montez Mathis averaged 30 MPG, would he average 6.7PPG......Nope, he averaged more per minutes played than that, and would be in double figures as well......

If you look at the "Points per Minutes played"....

Hyatt is averaging 6PPG in 16 or 17 minutes a game.....common sense or high probability, is if he played 30 minutes, would he still be stuck at 6PPG....Nope.....he also would be around 12 PPG....

If Mag plays 30 MPG, I have a high confidence level, he would not average just 6.7PPG......he also would likely scrap his way to double figures per game......

Let's be objective and factual about what we are watching.....the issue should not be asking RHJ to shoot 50% from the field 20 out of 20 B1G games and average 20PPG....it should not ask Baker to shoot 50% from the field, 40% from 3, and average 16 to 18PPG....

Are we as fans allergic to why Mulcahy, as a starting junior and experienced player, who knows our system, can't pick up the slack?? Why is his lack of production, somehow ignored....??

Let me leave out the defense Mulcahy kinda doesn't play that well.....not his fault, he's not a great athlete.....but if his man constantly outscored what Mulcahy generates, why does that fall on Harper and Baker???

Fire away.....I'm here for the discussion......
For some reason, it seems more often than not, the whole team underperforms on the road.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
Do we get them good hotels.. or bad hotels? Whichever it is.. CHANGE IT. Something is really off in road games. Did they take a bus to State College? Is there a record of how they do taking Bus vs Plane? Day vs night game.. etc etc. What they eat on the road? When they eat?

Something is up.

Figure it out.

We don't win road games.. so what do we have to lose.. EXPERIMENT.

SInce this thread is about Harper.. I'll suggest this.. he takes off on some possessions.. is that for rest? Are we giving him too many minutes? AS I said above.. EXPERIMENT in road games (which we do not win anyway). Harper is averaging almost 33 min a game.. make it 28 and see how he does. BTW.. he played 36 vs PSU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DHajekRC84

Randal7

All-American
Jul 22, 2009
6,710
6,120
77
Another mindless thread....

Let's put it this way, since fans appear to somehow looking to Harper or Baker.

A) The two players in past years, had bad shooting nights OR missed games altogether and RU was still OK

B) The Harper/Baker combo shot 5/21 from the floor.....obviously not good.....but the final score or margin was 17 points....maybe it could have been 11 or 13 or 14.....

If they shot 10/21 combined, which is practically 50% and if 3 of those 5 additional shots were 3s, that's 9 points for the 3s....and 4 points for the 2s.....that's still 13 points when RU lost by 17.

Not a math guy, but a normal or good game from both and RU still loses by 4?? How does the original poster, start with Harper and Baker??

Where was Mulcahy......Cliff scored 12 points....what about Caleb, the other starter.....

What about players off the bench....Hyatt missed 2 threes in the last minute when the game was decided, prior to that he was 1 of 5....but he at least took the ball to the hoop and drew 2 fouls and earned 4 FT....he made 2 of the 4...

The bottom line is to the stats, you have Paul Mulcahy playing 30 minutes a game and averaging 6.7PPG.....Paul didn't score until there were 5 minutes left in the game, when it was apparent, he relapsed into inconsistent, passive Paul.....the Mulcahy who passes up wide open lanes, doesn't pump fake or draw enough fouls.....who teams consistently leave open and Mulcahy still isn't taking those shots.

The issue, is not asking/demanding Harper and Baker to carry Mulcahy, carry a bench of inconsistent scorers and carry teams on the road.

The issue from a strictly numbers game.....look at the stats vs per minutes played.

Should a player playing 30 minutes a game, average 6PPG.....

If Jacob Young played 30 minutes, would he average 6.7PPG......Nope....he averaged around 12 to 13 last year in those same amount of minutes.....

If Montez Mathis averaged 30 MPG, would he average 6.7PPG......Nope, he averaged more per minutes played than that, and would be in double figures as well......

If you look at the "Points per Minutes played"....

Hyatt is averaging 6PPG in 16 or 17 minutes a game.....common sense or high probability, is if he played 30 minutes, would he still be stuck at 6PPG....Nope.....he also would be around 12 PPG....

If Mag plays 30 MPG, I have a high confidence level, he would not average just 6.7PPG......he also would likely scrap his way to double figures per game......

Let's be objective and factual about what we are watching.....the issue should not be asking RHJ to shoot 50% from the field 20 out of 20 B1G games and average 20PPG....it should not ask Baker to shoot 50% from the field, 40% from 3, and average 16 to 18PPG....

Are we as fans allergic to why Mulcahy, as a starting junior and experienced player, who knows our system, can't pick up the slack?? Why is his lack of production, somehow ignored....??

Let me leave out the defense Mulcahy kinda doesn't play that well.....not his fault, he's not a great athlete.....but if his man constantly outscored what Mulcahy generates, why does that fall on Harper and Baker???

Fire away.....I'm here for the discussion......
Everyone knows what mulcahy is. He’s maximizing what he is. The point being made in this thread is that Ron and Geo are not
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

rubjk

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2013
2,282
4,906
113
Having capable talent around Geo & Ron - would make a world's of difference. Not only bc they could cover for them on a bad night, but also it could supply energy to feed off. You see teammates stepping up, then it triggers you to step up and join the party. Alot of this is mental
How many teams in the country are going to win when their top two players are ice cold?
 

Yeah Baby

All-American
Aug 14, 2001
19,261
6,466
0
Who are these Rutgers fans that don't want him on the team? I've never met one
I didn’t say that or even come close to saying that. You (the board) are clamoring for other teams players and saying they are better. Other teams fans like our guys. Grass is always greener. Get it?
 

Yeah Baby

All-American
Aug 14, 2001
19,261
6,466
0
When did I say I wish we didn’t have Harper on our team? All I’m saying is that Harper has had too many games throughout his career where he hasn’t shown up. You don’t see that from other stars around the league. We don’t have the talent to overcome when he doesn’t have it.
Where did I say that you said that? Is the old phrase the grass is always greener on the other side too old for some to understand?
 
Last edited:

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,081
12,884
113
Everyone knows what mulcahy is. He’s maximizing what he is. The point being made in this thread is that Ron and Geo are not

I don't get the laser focus on only Mulcahy. He is the 4th (5th?) most talented player on the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Randal7

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,081
12,884
113
I didn’t say that or even come close to saying that. You (the board) are clamoring for other teams players and saying they are better. Other teams fans like our guys. Grass is always greener. Get it?

I would slightly disagree.
Some (rightly or wrongly) were expecting that with JY/MM/JM leaving, RHJ (and Geo to a much lesser extent) would step up as seniors and put themselves in the BIG POY/1st Team All-BIG conversation along with these other elite players.
As senior captains, be the team leaders and keep the team competitive.
Especially considering the pre-season expectations of building off a tournament bid last season.

Unfornatuely, RHJ has increased his scoring by less than 1pt (14.9 to 15.7) through the easy part of the schedule.
https://bigten.org/stats.aspx?path=mbball&year=2021
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

bethlehemfan

Heisman
Sep 6, 2003
15,112
16,398
113
I would slightly disagree.
Some (rightly or wrongly) were expecting that with JY/MM/JM leaving, RHJ (and Geo to a much lesser extent) would step up as seniors and put themselves in the BIG POY/1st Team All-BIG conversation along with these other elite players.
As senior captains, be the team leaders and keep the team competitive.
Especially considering the pre-season expectations of building off a tournament bid last season.

Unfornatuely, RHJ has increased his scoring by less than 1pt (14.9 to 15.7) through the easy part of the schedule.
https://bigten.org/stats.aspx?path=mbball&year=2021
Harp has improved his 3 Pt percentage, rebounds, assists and steals. All incremental but he’s clearly playing better. Bottom line is as geo and harp goes that’s how ru is going to go this year for the most part.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickRU714

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
I didn’t say that or even come close to saying that. You (the board) are clamoring for other teams players and saying they are better. Other teams fans like our guys. Grass is always greener. Get it?
Lol what? Who is clamoring for what team's other players?
 

winfield102

All-Conference
Jun 15, 2005
7,137
2,782
113
I don't think anyone expects PM to do more because he is limited offensively. Him playing 30 minutes is on Pike.

Harper is a guy that can score from everywhere. Where's the plan to get him the ball in different spots and get him going early? That's on Pike. Against quality defensive teams, you can't just wing it. Against ****** defensive teams, opportunities consistently present themselves. The announcers for the nebby game was crushing nebby for leaving Harper unguarded on a regular basis.

I was saying "wtf" for the majority of our 1st 10-12 possessions (really the majority of the 1st half possessions). We see other teams with a plan to get the ball down low or into the hands of their star player. We looked like 5 guys playing together at the y for the first time, who had no idea what the strengths of each other was. Caleb turning it over in 2 attempts to go ISO. WTF. (Why was Caleb going iso at the end of the Michigan game btw?).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Corycord1

Yeah Baby

All-American
Aug 14, 2001
19,261
6,466
0
Lol what? Who is clamoring for what team's other players?
The guy who I was talking to when you jumped in. I figured you were reading this thread when you jumped in on my discussion with someone else. My bad.
 

Yeah Baby

All-American
Aug 14, 2001
19,261
6,466
0
I would slightly disagree.
Some (rightly or wrongly) were expecting that with JY/MM/JM leaving, RHJ (and Geo to a much lesser extent) would step up as seniors and put themselves in the BIG POY/1st Team All-BIG conversation along with these other elite players.
As senior captains, be the team leaders and keep the team competitive.
Especially considering the pre-season expectations of building off a tournament bid last season.

Unfornatuely, RHJ has increased his scoring by less than 1pt (14.9 to 15.7) through the easy part of the schedule.
https://bigten.org/stats.aspx?path=mbball&year=2021
Not sure what you’re disagreeing with here. I understand what you are saying. I get everyone wants those guys to score 30 pts every game. I do too. But I talk to fans of many other teams and they all talk about RHJ and Geo with high regard and respect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickRU714

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
Not sure what you’re disagreeing with here. I understand what you are saying. I get everyone wants those guys to score 30 pts every game. I do too. But I talk to fans of many other teams and they all talk about RHJ and Geo with high regard and respect.
AS a percentage of total scoring this year I'd guess RHJ is a lot higher than last year... but we are scoring a lot less... for a lot of reasons...

21.28% of total scoring.. in 2020/2021

22.78% of total scoring so far in 2021/2022

oops.. not as high as I'd thought it would be
 

rudad02

All-American
Nov 7, 2010
8,853
5,773
0
One disappointing part about Ron is that even if his shot is off, he should be able to use his size and strength to score in the paint and have a solid game anyway. Geo can score here and there driving to the rim, but if he is off he isn't going to feast around the basket. Ron can will his way to 15 even if he's off shooting
Yes.
 

S.W.A.I.N

All-Conference
Nov 23, 2004
4,579
4,863
81
I really like Ron as well. He’s a winner at every level he’s played at and he could easily have just rested on pops laurels but he’s made his own name. Massive credit to him there. But this dude needs to take this team and lead it. That’s what’s missing. That Michael Jordan esque refusal to lose. I don’t see that.
That’s it, pack it up, he isn’t MJ…