Harper should have missed the second FT

A

anon_xekqhstck0ygt

Guest
A few of us said it in the game thread, ya
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
I’ll take the points. They get the rebound, call timeout. Then if they draw a foul, we’re done for. Let them try a Hail Mary play again. If they make it full court with only 2 seconds and heart break us a second time, hats off to them.
Yeah, but this makes the Hail Mary way harder . If they even get to that point
 

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,085
12,886
113
If you saw the look on Harper's face when he made the second, he WAS trying to miss it

I thought the same based on how he seemed to shoot quickly and flatly shoot it.
Thought he might have been trying to miss.
 

rob kight

All-American
Oct 22, 2020
4,920
6,250
113
there was no indisputable evidence to overturn the out of bounds call that would have given us the ball. But overall if we made some chippies the game would not have been close. But we all have to be happy with a win. One game at a time. Hope Minnesota game is on!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arizona Knight

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
65,217
44,292
113
there was no indisputable evidence to overturn the out of bounds call that would have given us the ball. But overall if we made some chippies the game would not have been close. But we all have to be happy with a win. One game at a time. Hope Minnesota game is on!
yeah, but the shot at the end of the first half was really hard to overturn, IMO, plus we got the phantom call with 2 seconds left, so this is not the game to complain about the refs, IMO (I did a little early on, but it evened out and was well officiated IMO).
 

RutgersDom

All-American
Nov 18, 2003
5,972
7,405
113
Disagree. They had a timeout. Would just call a timeout. Make it and play D.
And what if they have a make up call and they get 3 free throws. Rather be up 1 or 2? It’s a 50/50. Call. Either way is acceptable.