I would say if you go thru the history of the SEC we would rank right down there with Vandy and Ky as a lower tier SEC program. We have been over performing the last nine years basically rising up to middle of the pack but historically we are bottom tier. UT and Arky had there glory days. Even Mizzou for a few of their years. And we know about the others that are usually dominant. I'm always amazed the way some folks talk like this is a 9 or 10 win program annually. It ain't
I'm amazed at the way some folks talk like we are still in 1980.
We do not in any shape form or fashion rank with Vandy as an SEC program. Whether we are with KY or not depends on how far you want to look back. You can put UK with us and Umiss, or you can put them slightly below. Arkansas is similar, if you look back far enough, they look like a tier above us and UM. They probably deserve the benefit of the doubt, but I'm not sure A&M and Mizzou joining the SEC wasn't fatal for their program. I think they're actually slightly worse off than MSU even though they are the only major school in their state and they have a money advantage, but that's based on me thinking Bert was actually a good coach, that his system was a good fit for arkansas, and that his record a Wisconsin wasn't a fluke. I think Arkansas is just a hard place to win right now. But maybe Bert just wasn't that good and they compounded that with a mediocre hire made much worse by the need to completely retool the roster to run his offense.