On a bandwagon I was one of the leaders for(hiring Hudspeth)...
He would have brought David Saunders with him. He would have brought "the plan" and gotten guys into school. The OM investigation still happens -- which still leads to a Saunders investigation. In all likelihood, we end up vacating wins and all just like ULL did.
But wait. We were already under investigation for Redmond at that point. And might have already been under sanctions. Would that have been tacked on to the Redmond investigation -- or would it have led to a second investigation with the threat of repeat offenders? I guess it really depends on the timeline.
All that to say -- we are definitely better off right now than we would be had I gotten what I wanted and a bunch of you wanted to do -- in response to Freeze. Just be careful what you wish for. One of my biggest problems with the "fahr Mullenz now" approach -- is that it's so hard to come up with a realistic candidate that is a clear upgrade resume-wise.
I do think we are approaching the most critical 2-3 year stretch for us in-state that we are likely to see in the near future, and that we really need to cash in on. I don't have great faith in Mullen to do it -- but I don't know that any clearly better candidate exists to fill that vacuum.
He would have brought David Saunders with him. He would have brought "the plan" and gotten guys into school. The OM investigation still happens -- which still leads to a Saunders investigation. In all likelihood, we end up vacating wins and all just like ULL did.
But wait. We were already under investigation for Redmond at that point. And might have already been under sanctions. Would that have been tacked on to the Redmond investigation -- or would it have led to a second investigation with the threat of repeat offenders? I guess it really depends on the timeline.
All that to say -- we are definitely better off right now than we would be had I gotten what I wanted and a bunch of you wanted to do -- in response to Freeze. Just be careful what you wish for. One of my biggest problems with the "fahr Mullenz now" approach -- is that it's so hard to come up with a realistic candidate that is a clear upgrade resume-wise.
I do think we are approaching the most critical 2-3 year stretch for us in-state that we are likely to see in the near future, and that we really need to cash in on. I don't have great faith in Mullen to do it -- but I don't know that any clearly better candidate exists to fill that vacuum.