So, the CJ article says UL paid the income taxes for Turtleneck, but I seem to recall a case from my law school days stating that if an employer pays the income tax owed by an employee on behalf of that employee, said payment of tax was also compensation that had to be taxed. In other words, it is impossible for an employer to eliminate an employee's tax obligation.
GYEROLAW, did I just make that up or amirite?
And if I am right, doesn't that article expose a possible tax problem for UL and/or TOM?