Gunnerson now a 4*

Aug 18, 2016
16,645
10,920
113
Not a big deal to me, but whether others moved ahead of you or you dropped below others it's the same thing just with a different PR spin. Winking

No. He is still 4 star and his rating stayed the same.

He didn’t drop. Other guys improved their star rating and overall rating and passed him.

If they dropped him to a 3 star or lowered his .9498, then he would have dropped.

Those folks still see him as the same player.

The connotation is different.
 
Sep 29, 2001
75,439
12,977
0
No. He is still 4 star and his rating stayed the same.

He didn’t drop. Other guys improved their star rating and overall rating and passed him.

If they dropped him to a 3 star or lowered his .9498, then he would have dropped.

Those folks still see him as the same player.

The connotation is different.
OK, we'll agree to disagree on that logic. Not a big deal but you're talking in absolute terms and I'm talking about the relative ranking of players to each other (ie., the pecking order).
 
  • Like
Reactions: John_J_Rambo

John_J_Rambo

Senior
Feb 22, 2019
2,015
906
13
OK, we'll agree to disagree on that logic. Not a big deal but you're talking in absolute terms and I'm talking about the relative ranking of players to each other (ie., the pecking order).

it's like in racing when one guy continues at his same pace and many others go faster he doesn't drop

o wait
 

huskerssalts

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2014
7,213
2,216
0
It’s funny how players are jumping above Betts, he had a top 5-6 Square of 130.71 and was higher then some of 24/7 top WRs. Simply put, they have Betts screwed on their site. But I do give them props for having Hutmacher and Gunnerson 4 star players. Well deserved. GBR!!!
 
Sep 29, 2001
75,439
12,977
0
it's like in racing when one guy continues at his same pace and many others go faster he doesn't drop

o wait
So then he didn't then actually drop 5 places from a first place finish IF 5 other racers actually passed him up? Got it. Winking

If he was in second place then he's still in second place even though 5 guys now are ahead of him to finish second. Great math there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John_J_Rambo

John_J_Rambo

Senior
Feb 22, 2019
2,015
906
13
So then he didn't then actually drop 5 places from a first place finish IF 5 other racers actually passed him up? Got it. Winking

If he was in second place then he's still in second place even though 5 guys now are ahead of him to finish second. Great math there.

ha yea we're simpatico
 
Aug 18, 2016
16,645
10,920
113
OK, we'll agree to disagree on that logic. Not a big deal but you're talking in absolute terms and I'm talking about the relative ranking of players to each other (ie., the pecking order).

Two things, they rate the players then rank them based on the rating. That is different than what happens in other rankings where they rank say a football team. No one says Nebraska is rated .972, then they take all the ratings and rank them. If Nebraska is ranked 8th in the polls in week one and no one changes their ranking of Nebraska in their poll, they will continue to be ranked 8th, even if someone different is ranked 7th. Even though someone different is ranked higher than Nebraska, Nebraska didn’t drop.

It’s different. IMHO.
 

Captain Nick

All-Conference
Jul 22, 2008
1,038
1,297
0
I love to 25% improvement overnight!.....how do I get that?
 

Suhrreal

All-Conference
Jun 1, 2009
7,380
1,049
0
It’s funny how players are jumping above Betts, he had a top 5-6 Square of 130.71 and was higher then some of 24/7 top WRs. Simply put, they have Betts screwed on their site. But I do give them props for having Hutmacher and Gunnerson 4 star players. Well deserved. GBR!!!

It's a top 100 football players list, not a top 100 SPARQ score list. They had plenty of time to evaluate him with the other top WRs up close and in person.