Getting rid of Kickoffs

aTotal360

Heisman
Nov 12, 2009
22,659
16,669
113
NFL brass is discussing it. Supposedly their internal studies indicate there is 5x chance of injury during a KO than any other play.

Question is...does that mean onside kicks are gone too? That would kinda suck.
 

dawgstudent

Heisman
Apr 15, 2003
40,714
22,874
113
There is an inherent risk of playing football. That's one reason you get paid millions.
 

DawgInThe256

All-Conference
Feb 18, 2011
1,585
1,434
83
The new "Alliance" football league is supposed to do away with kickoffs. If a trailing team wants to "onside kick", they get the ball at their own 35 facing 4th and 10.
 

thf24

Redshirt
Jan 28, 2011
1,334
3
38
Even if they don't go through with it, their attempts to reduce the number of runbacks are eventually going to result in them being effectively removed (touchbacks every time). They're probably going to get more heavy-handed on that front since their last experiment, moving touchbacks to the 25, backfired and resulted in more runbacks, not less. That might be preferable though since it would keep onside kicks with somewhat of an element of surprise in play.
 

kendesu

Redshirt
Oct 1, 2014
287
0
0
I would be in favor of limiting kickoffs. Start each half with a kickoff. Kickoff after a score inside two minutes to go in the half. In between, just give the other team the ball on the 20 or 25 after each score. You could adjust the specifics, but there's no need for 12 kickoffs in a game.
 

TrueMaroonGrind

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2017
4,141
1,730
113
There is an inherent risk of playing football. That's one reason you get paid millions.

I would disagree to an extent. MLB doesn't really have that much risk and they get paid a boatload more than NFL guys. The main reason they get paid a ton is because a ton of people pay to watch them. Arena football players get paid jack squat and what they do is just as dangerous as the NFL players.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,270
32,960
113
I actually kind of like this. It's a good compromise and would probably help reduce the ever expanding game times too.
 

seshomoru

Senior
Apr 24, 2006
5,660
452
83
Do they get paid millions because it's risky or because they do other football stuff better than anyone else? Maybe it's just protecting the most valuable assets/employees?
 

BlueRidgeMtns

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2016
5,599
3,507
113
I wonder what the chance of injury would be during a punt compared to other scenarios?
 

Go Budaw

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
7,321
0
36
The new "Alliance" football league is supposed to do away with kickoffs. If a trailing team wants to "onside kick", they get the ball at their own 35 facing 4th and 10.

That is an absolutely horrible rule. It is far easier to convert a 4th and 10 than it is to convert an onside kick. Would completely change the game and heavily skew results in favor of high powered offenses.

Just think, Bama could probably play an entire game against MTSU, Akron, etc. with their defense never even having to take the field.
 
Last edited:

QuadrupleOption

All-Conference
Aug 21, 2012
1,297
1,441
93
NFL brass is discussing it. Supposedly their internal studies indicate there is 5x chance of injury during a KO than any other play.

Question is...does that mean onside kicks are gone too? That would kinda suck.

I think it's a mistake to get rid of kickoffs.
KO returns are a wild card in football games that can allow a less-skilled/athletic team to win a game with a great play. I'd hate to see those removed.
Do punt returns fall under this as well?
 

5049

Redshirt
Dec 3, 2017
700
0
0
I think it's a mistake to get rid of kickoffs.
KO returns are a wild card in football games that can allow a less-skilled/athletic team to win a game with a great play. I'd hate to see those removed.
Do punt returns fall under this as well?
It's actually the opposite. Special teams give higher talented teams with more depth another edge. If you are looking at this through the lens of Mississippi State or parity in general, getting rid of the return game can only be good. Of course it cuts both ways, I've seen us use special teams to defeat a number of G5 schools.
 

512taylor

Redshirt
Sep 2, 2012
1,546
0
0
Another idea...

Take away all those fancy face masks.

Let's see what player wants to slam into another player if that tackler is not protected from severe injury.
 

RocketDawg

All-Conference
Oct 21, 2011
20,472
3,111
113
If they change the rules too much ... and not having a kickoff is probably going too far ... I think attendenance will plummet. People go to see hard knocks (not necessarly injuries) just like to to a NASCAR race to see the exciting wrecks.
 

QuadrupleOption

All-Conference
Aug 21, 2012
1,297
1,441
93
It's actually the opposite. Special teams give higher talented teams with more depth another edge. If you are looking at this through the lens of Mississippi State or parity in general, getting rid of the return game can only be good. Of course it cuts both ways, I've seen us use special teams to defeat a number of G5 schools.

That's a good point. I was thinking more along the lines of having one really special player returning kicks along with 10 decent to good players blocking for him. Teams like Bama would still have an edge because they are so deep, but in general it can make a large difference in the outcome of a game. Not necessarily even in TDs scored but just field position advantage.
 

thekimmer

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2012
8,922
3,113
113
Well, if they are going to do this then......

NFL brass is discussing it. Supposedly their internal studies indicate there is 5x chance of injury during a KO than any other play.

Question is...does that mean onside kicks are gone too? That would kinda suck.

Go ahead and revamp other rules too.

Primarily, change the rule to 5 minute quarters (or shorter) and clock stops after every play. That would largely eliminate running out the clock and the need for most onside kicks. When you think about it, it does not make much sense for a game where the vast majority of the play clock is spent not playing the game.
 

ababyatemydingo

All-Conference
Nov 27, 2008
4,151
3,164
113
NFL brass is discussing it. Supposedly their internal studies indicate there is 5x chance of injury during a KO than any other play.

Question is...does that mean onside kicks are gone too? That would kinda suck.

Why don’t they just put a flag on each hip and call it a day. They’ve been doing everything possible to run off fans for several years now, anyway.
 

5049

Redshirt
Dec 3, 2017
700
0
0


Watch this video. It changed my mind and will probably change yours too.

How did I know that that was going to be put together by SBNation ie Vox. Inventing problems because STATS.

The only true point he has is player safety. Taking away the kickoff would take away a lot of excitement from the game.
 

5049

Redshirt
Dec 3, 2017
700
0
0
Do they get paid millions because it's risky or because they do other football stuff better than anyone else? Maybe it's just protecting the most valuable assets/employees?
Both, and to deny that is straight delusion
 

5049

Redshirt
Dec 3, 2017
700
0
0
Why don’t they just put a flag on each hip and call it a day. They’ve been doing everything possible to run off fans for several years now, anyway.
It's the concern troll/left leaning side that is going to run me off. I'm already done with the NFL. If they start paying college players I'll be done with that too

All the while, baseball teams can't even give their teams full rides
 

Go Budaw

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
7,321
0
36
True, but who cares about the alliance football league. If it is entertaining for us to watch that is all that matters.

Well, I can tell you right off the bat that I’m not going to give a **** about it regardless of the kickoff rules. But a dumb rule is a dumb rule. And entertainment value should be 2nd to actually changing the balance of the game and affecting results on the field. This is the same thing as if the American League decided they were going to add a 2nd DH to hit for the position player of their choice. It’s just wrong.
 

aTotal360

Heisman
Nov 12, 2009
22,659
16,669
113
It's not the left or the media. It's the legal side of it. The NFL has to install rules and regulations to satiate the all the litigious entities involved. They are constantly under a barrage of lawsuits that involve player health. They have to "do something".
 

QuaoarsKing

All-Conference
Mar 11, 2008
6,360
3,282
113
Well, I can tell you right off the bat that I’m not going to give a **** about it regardless of the kickoff rules. But a dumb rule is a dumb rule. And entertainment value should be 2nd to actually changing the balance of the game and affecting results on the field. This is the same thing as if the American League decided they were going to add a 2nd DH to hit for the position player of their choice. It’s just wrong.

As the video I posted proves, kickoffs have little effect on scoring, and when they do, it's almost always due to luck.
 

Go Budaw

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
7,321
0
36
I would be in favor of limiting kickoffs. Start each half with a kickoff. Kickoff after a score inside two minutes to go in the half. In between, just give the other team the ball on the 20 or 25 after each score. You could adjust the specifics, but there's no need for 12 kickoffs in a game.

I would say just do it like high school football. Any kickoff into the end zone is an automatic touchback. That is a logical first step to reduce the number of returns. Then go from there as far as other potential options if results aren’t improved.

As far as the reducing the overall overall number of kickoffs, good luck with that, especially at the NFL level. Networks and the league aren’t going to want to give up the ad revenue from the “Score-Commercial Break-Kickoff-Commercial Break-1st and 10” pattern that they have already established. You get rid of kickoffs, you are taking one commercial break off every scoring play in the game. Those breaks aren’t going away. They will add designated TV timeouts (like basketball), or make each existing break longer in order to make up for it. Not that I agree with any of that, but it’s just reality.
 

G-Dawg

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2012
1,190
107
63
Actually, take away the facemasks and people wouldn't be tackling with their headgear. You would probably eliminate just about all of the so-called "targeting"
 

Palos verdes

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
1,839
36
48
NFL brass is discussing it. Supposedly their internal studies indicate there is 5x chance of injury during a KO than any other play.

Question is...does that mean onside kicks are gone too? That would kinda suck.

Football will become a historic sport some point in the 21st century.
 

5049

Redshirt
Dec 3, 2017
700
0
0
As the video I posted proves, kickoffs have little effect on scoring, and when they do, it's almost always due to luck.
You cannot say that it has "little effect" if it's not compared with other plays. He didn't statistically break down punt returns that I saw
 

dogfan96

Redshirt
Jun 3, 2007
2,188
12
66
As the video I posted proves, kickoffs have little effect on scoring, and when they do, it's almost always due to luck.

Of course you're correct but all the fake "old school" guys will ignore it. Kickoffs in the NFL have very little to do with scoring and result in a touchback 60% of the time.
 

EurekaDog

Redshirt
Nov 10, 2010
598
0
0
Next, punts will go away. Ball will be placed 45 yards down field from the

line of scrimmage, but not inside the 15 yard line of the "receiving" team.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
17,006
6,834
113
It's the concern troll/left leaning side that is going to run me off. I'm already done with the NFL. If they start paying college players I'll be done with that too
All the while, baseball teams can't even give their teams full rides

Damn women makin it tough for more guys to get full rides!
How dare they**
 

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
18,458
7,573
113
Damn boys, the NFL is circling

For the first time, an NFL team will have men as part of its official spirit squad.
Quinton Peron and Napoleon Jinnies, named to the Los Angeles Rams squad this week, will be the first ones to perform the same routine as the female dancers. The Baltimore Ravens and Indianapolis Colts have men who perform stunts with female cheerleaders, but don't dance.
Peron and Jinnies are both classically trained dancers and have been performing their entire lives.
 
Maroon and White

Latest

  1. 01 Maroon and White Basketball Sam Purcell praises Mississippi State's offensive breakout: "The way they played at UT Martin was what I've been seeing in practice"
  2. 02 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Week 11 Preview: Auburn Players to Know
  3. 03 Rivals Football Recruiting JUCO Intel: Top recruits taking mid-week, final officials before decision time
  4. 04 Maroon and White Mississippi State S Kendel Dolby speaks on defensive adjustments ahead of Auburn game
  5. 05 Maroon and White Basketball "His part in our team, no coach can do": Josh Hubbard impact felt on the court and in the locker room as much as in the record books