Getting bored of CFP

jimmyjoseph

All-Conference
Jun 18, 2020
4,574
3,884
113
I think adding more teams adds more ability to recruit at a higher level for other schools. Right now, it's a momentum/self-fulfilling prophecy issue where the great teams make the playoffs, makes it more appealing to play for the great teams, and those same teams continue to make the playoffs. If you're elite and your goal is to make the playoffs, you're going to Alabama, Clemson, and Ohio State right now... and there's not much to slow it down.

Adding more teams will level the recruiting field a little bit.

Say what you will about the wild west of college football pre-playoff (and especially pre-BCS and post-85 scholarship limit), that is where we saw the "best" "parity" in FBS as a whole.
if you believe the #7 team in the country is mediocre then you really aren't interested in college fb to begin with.
 

saluno22

All-Conference
Mar 1, 2006
8,043
2,379
0
I think that if you extended automatic invitations to every Power 5 conference champ (with a sixth berth in a six-team playoff to the highest-ranked Group of 5 champ), it could even out recruiting a bit, especially in the South.

If you're Nebraska, Iowa State or Colorado, for example, you might have a better shot at a top-tier Southern player by saying, "Listen, other than Alabama and Clemson, you have no shot at being in the playoffs. Come here, and give us a shot at the Big Ten (Pac-12, Big XII) title, and we'll get you into the playoffs."

Of course, all those Florida players might get one hint of a Midwestern winter and head back home to play for FAU or FIU, but that would be a boon for Group of 5 programs that already play at a high level (Boise, Cincinnati, UCF, Houston, etc.) who would have a shot at a playoff berth as well.

As it stands, you can pretty much pencil in only the SEC champ and ACC champ, with a second SEC team or Notre Dame filling the third spot, leaving the Big Ten, the Big XII and the Pac-12 out of the running unless they run the table and go 13-0 (or 6-0 in OSU's case this year). That's a tough hill to climb, one that an SEC team or Clemson generally doesn't have to scale.

And to say that one team is obviously better than a team from another conference is often based only on win-loss records, often in the same conference, or from games played between conferences in September. And as we know, in a normal season, most teams change over time.

As for Iowa, they'd have to up their game and start shooting for championships instead of printing t-shirts for second- and third-place finishes, their current apex and measuring stick for excellence.
I'm with you and have said time and again there needs to be an "objective path" for any team to qualify. Seeing these "Percentage chance of making the CFP" on the ESPN talking head shows makes no sense. What are these percentages based on?

Expand the playoff, create an objective path (win your conference).
 

saluno22

All-Conference
Mar 1, 2006
8,043
2,379
0
Honestly yes, mainly for entertainment and interest if college fans. I mean, I look at college football as the best, most pure sport out there. The passion and dedication of college fans is beyond that of any pro sport in my opinion. I get that you want to crown a champion but that’s not all what college football is about in my opinion. Add more teams to this thing and that will generate a ton more hope and meaning to the seasons. It will also potentially stop every 5 star recruit from going to 1 of 4 schools. I also think the open transfer market/free agency is going to help as well going forward
CORRECTION: That's not what FBS is all about. Every other college football division isn't like FBS and has a large playoff field to crown a champion.