That's reacting to the market. Would imagine, at least only going from the information in the tweet, that if they all use the same software, that software could be used to all raise prices together.I don't know about algorithmic price fixing. Landlords can simply look at the for rent pages on realtor.com and see what prices are for similar properties
Don't know about that, but I'm renting a condo in Virginia, and before I set a price I took my own advice and looked at realtor.com to see what similar units were/had rented for. So, maybe there's more to this than I understand, But hey, if Californians don't have a problem with it, neither do I.That's reacting to the market. Would imagine, at least only going from the information in the tweet, that if they all use the same software, that software could be used to all raise prices together.
Many short term rental services like Airbnb use algorithms to set prices, will these be included? In general I'm not opposed to what he is saying, I think his intentions are good, but I doubt this helps much in the long term. It seems like a focus on regulation instead of focusing on fixing the supply.That's reacting to the market. Would imagine, at least only going from the information in the tweet, that if they all use the same software, that software could be used to all raise prices together.
I hear you on all that, I don't know either. But seems worthy of trying I suppose.Many short term rental services like Airbnb use algorithms to set prices, will these be included? In general I'm not opposed to what he is saying, I think his intentions are good, but I doubt this helps much in the long term. It seems like a focus on regulation instead of focusing on fixing the supply.
somehow, I would think ROI would enter into a landlord's thought process. If I can't make a decent return, why be in the business?I hear you on all that, I don't know either. But seems worthy of trying I suppose.
Sure. Not sure why any of that is relevant.somehow, I would think ROI would enter into a landlord's thought process. If I can't make a decent return, why be in the business?
that was my thought as well. But there must be more to it than we realize. Otherwise what's the point?Sure. Not sure why any of that is relevant.
Same way that companies aren't allowed to collude to raise prices together (they have to let the market decide), these algorithms and software apparently has been a way around that.that was my thought as well. But there must be more to it than we realize. Otherwise what's the point?
Isn’t it all the same. The software is taking data that’s available to anyone and simply compiling into information that they’re using. This information is out there, seems like they just want them to work for the info lol. You’ll see this more and more imo as the market pivots more to renters.Same way that companies aren't allowed to collude to raise prices together (they have to let the market decide), these algorithms and software apparently has been a way around that.
Instead of competition driving what they charge, it sounds like they were all using the same software that instead of going by competition and the market.
Yea, understand. I've rented before and my philosophy was to to keep the place rented at the highest price possible. If everybody else was renting at $2000, I'd go for $1950/1975. But I guess I''m not as greedy a capitalist.Same way that companies aren't allowed to collude to raise prices together (they have to let the market decide), these algorithms and software apparently has been a way around that.
Instead of competition driving what they charge, it sounds like they were all using the same software that instead of going by competition and the market.
Right, and that makes sense.Yea, understand. I've rented before and my philosophy was to to keep the place rented at the highest price possible. If everybody else was renting at $2000, I'd go for $1950/1975. But I guess I''m not as greedy a capitalist.
not an expert, maybe bear can weigh in, but I would have thought price fixing is already . I don't have a dog in this fight, so if Californians want it, fine by me.Right, and that makes sense.
What should be illegal is for all of the landlords in the city to collude and all decide to charge 2500 (or in your case 2450/2475). Because if everyone does it, what are renters going to do otherwise? Sounds like they were trying to get around this by all using the same software.
Again though, I don't really know to be clear, I'm going off what I'm seeing.
Right, what I'm saying is it appears this is closing a loophole.not an expert, maybe bear can weigh in, but I would have thought price fixing is already . I don't have a dog in this fight, so if Californians want it, fine by me.
Libs, anything to say about this? Do you defend it? lol