Gary Waters against graduate transfers - ESPN interview

Sideline20

Senior
Jul 27, 2001
5,434
956
0

ecojew

All-Conference
Feb 1, 2006
9,767
2,271
0
If we truly want to keep the "student" in "student-athlete," then a student who has graduated should be allowed to pursue his/her grad degree at another university and use a remaining year of athletic eligibility without penalty. I can understand a coach's desire to keep the student around after investing so much time in him/her but the student's ultimate interests need to come first. Stanford's Shaw got it right.

We should be focusing our energy on the athletes who don't graduate, not those who do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: billhobo

blockm2

Senior
Jul 9, 2001
4,354
584
0
I have a hard time being against a system that rewards a player for graduating college with the option of continuing to play/study somewhere else for a year. Especially when that same system let's those players' coaches they committed to up and leave for another school with no notice.

So coaches that treat jobs like a turnstyle trying to always go somewhere bigger and better probably shouldn't whine when their players graduate and then look to go somewhere else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MADHAT1

Knight_Light

Hall of Famer
May 29, 2001
95,836
136,389
113
Cleveland State's roster has been ravaged by these transfers. Imagine if they had the 3 seniors this season.......Bryn Forbes (Michigan State)....well he went "hardship", while Trey Lewis (Louisville) and Anton Grady (Wichita State) graduated and left. They would have been NCAA bound for sure. Now, not so much.

Most Graduate Transfers are 5th years...as they have used a redshirt year in the past (like at Cleveland St, either for transfering in and/or not being qualified in Year 1).

Very few graduate after 3 years of college (and college play), so if you don't want players to graduate/leave your program with 1 year of eligibility, don't redshirt and/or except transfers who need a redshirt year to sit out.
 

billhobo

Redshirt
Jan 7, 2004
3,325
37
0
If we truly want to keep the "student" in "student-athlete," then a student who has graduated should be allowed to pursue his/her grad degree at another university and use a remaining year of athletic eligibility without penalty. I can understand a coach's desire to keep the student around after investing so much time in him/her but the student's ultimate interests need to come first. Stanford's Shaw got it right.

We should be focusing our energy on the athletes who don't graduate, not those who do.
Agree 100%. Often we're criticizing college athletics for too many kids not graduating, but in this particular thread we're debating graduates as if graduation's a bad thing.
 
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Basketball Analytical look Rutgers Women's Basketball opening the season with a 31-point win
  2. 02 The Knight Report Join The Knight Report TODAY and get it for 60% off!
  3. 03 The Knight Report The Knight Report - Ask The Experts Chat: November 4th Edition
  4. 04 The Knight Report Basketball How to watch Rutgers / La Salle; Pregame Info, More: Gameday Central
  5. 05 The Knight Report Three Rutgers Basketball Commits Ranked Among Nation's Top 150 Prospects