Football GAMEDAY THREAD: Rutgers vs. Temple

-RUFAN4LIFE-

Heisman
Feb 28, 2015
33,843
52,496
113
Vedral would have been no better. It’s our offense coordinator that stinks! He has had 3 years to develop Simon and this is what he has to show for it? He also had the opportunity to bring in transfers. Gleeson decides he has what he needs.
He doesn't stink he just has very predictable tendencies that put the skill guys in bad down and distances. But we've seen what happens when he doesn't run every first down. The mixed play calling results in good ball movement and momentum on offense.

They don't have an OL that will blow guys off the ball every snap. That's 2-3 years away if RU is lucky enough to develop several of these young guys. Until then call plays that put your offense in the best position.
 

-RUFAN4LIFE-

Heisman
Feb 28, 2015
33,843
52,496
113
Sorry to bring this up yet again but this is what SOME have seen out of our two young QBs all summer long . All we heard was schiano not being fair , schiano not giving so snd so a chance etc and oh yeah Vedral sucks should not start. I think Rutgers nation has seen what our QB room looks like RIGHT NOW. there are no conspiracy theories gentlemen as some said all summer long. There are concerns at QB and we have to piece things together .
Haha, now it's Sean isn't calling the offense. They just pivot to a new tinfoil hat conspiracy theory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDiddy777

mugrat86

Heisman
Dec 11, 2014
8,254
10,818
82
Color me shocked that I was right all this time. BTW he doesn't stink he just has very predictable tendencies that put the skill guys in bad down and distances. But we've seen what happens when he doesn't run every first down. The mixed play calling results in good ball movement and momentum on offense.
Um you defended him and pounced all over me last year
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Isn't it sad that neither of our QB's are good/reliable enough to finish this game that we need to put in Langan to just muscle the ball down the field?
Not at all. Everyone in the building knows it's running time. Letting Johnny run gives us an extra blocker. Makes perfect sense
 
Jan 12, 2015
39,463
39,563
113
My heart agrees with you, at least for style points - but you’ve gotta do the smart thing and end it there.
Only about 10 seconds left there-I'd run it in. As I said you definitely take the knee if it's closer to a minute on the clock. I understand the .001% chance that it could backfire but I like the odds it won't. And I'll admit I like the window dressing, style points could count if we're borderline bowl eligible at the end of the season.

Note: this is because we were playing Temple...in B1G play you definitely go down at the 1 and end it.
 
Last edited:

kupuna133

All-American
Jul 13, 2015
7,083
7,868
113
so Wimsatt is the answer, I agree.
Wouldn’t matter who the QB is, If the QB is not allowed to read the d and make the correct call. You can tell pre snap where the ball is going. Look at the body language of the receivers who know the RPO is prescripted for run. Look at the line splits on run they are much narrower than when it is scripted for pass. It’s fairly easy to see where the ball is going.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDead

LukeRU90

Senior
Oct 18, 2010
960
433
63
Wouldn’t matter who the QB is, If the QB is not allowed to read the d and make the correct call. You can tell pre snap where the ball is going. Look at the body language of the receivers who know the RPO is prescripted for run. Look at the line splits on run they are much narrower than when it is scripted for pass. It’s fairly easy to see where the ball is going.
Maybe, but with the complete sell out of the rush, like Temple did today, Wimsatt's running ability should have been able to neutralize Temple's plan. A few long QB runs when the LBs and line sell out on the rush and they stop. With Simon, yes, too obvious where he was going. So sick of the deep fades on the sideline which never worked, especially 2 on 1. Wimsatt gives us more options when all receivers are covered.
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,838
16,623
113
Iowa is dropping at least 28 on us lmao. They are eventually going to break out, and we’re an excellent stepping stone.
eventually if not sooner.
But the same might be said about the RU QB play and instead of looking at Evan and Gavin as not ready for prime time, against Iowa one of them will step up and prove to be a prime time player.
Either that or ( here he comes to save the day) Super Noah will come to play better than we thought he could and the D will stop the Hawkeyes from moving the chain .
I much rather look forward to a nice win than feel the opponent will do some damage
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
31,838
16,623
113
It’s always been depressing if you’ve been paying attention. But he’s a great fit !
3-0 makes the fit a lot better than you think.
Getting to another bowl game will make the fit look pretty good even though the getting there was on the ugly side.
Making a bowl game last year helped the fit
So far the coach of your dreams is 11- 14 three games into his 3rd year after taking over a program that was 8-33 for the 4 previous years ( HC was fired after 5 games into 4th year)
 

kupuna133

All-American
Jul 13, 2015
7,083
7,868
113
Maybe, but with the complete sell out of the rush, like Temple did today, Wimsatt's running ability should have been able to neutralize Temple's plan. A few long QB runs when the LBs and line sell out on the rush and they stop. With Simon, yes, too obvious where he was going. So sick of the deep fades on the sideline which never worked, especially 2 on 1. Wimsatt gives us more options when all receivers are covered.
That’s play design not talent related. If the “read” is predetermined before the snap it doesn’t matter who is handing the ball off. There needs to be an actual RPO read.Wimsatt nor Simon have been allowed to make a read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUShea

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,512
4,707
66
Oh, he’s a fraud alright. Was clear, even before today. And the fault of the fan base for forcing Hobbs to hire him and overpay on exponential scale.
 

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
23,820
12,480
113
Temple is not that bad a team, not sure why people thought that.
They lost to Duke ..ACC bottom feeder…by 30 points. And were in a 7 point game vs. Lafayette in the 4th Qtr. Temple SUCKS . This was hopefully our WTF game. Poor preparation/ no motivation
 

mildone_rivals

Heisman
Dec 19, 2011
55,607
51,272
0
OR.... He wasn't put in the right position to succeed because he had a governor attached to his game.
Maybe. But he's the only QB who has interceptions this season, and hasn't exactly been on target with some of his other throws.

He has a hell of an arm and can run. But he seems not quite ready to start, to me, at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDiddy777
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,952
0
Temple didn’t improve that much from last season, or even from last week from the Lafayette game

Rutgers did not show up with even their C game game today. They expected Temple to just lie down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rusty_Screw_88

Colbert17!

Heisman
Aug 30, 2014
17,425
18,881
113
It’s always been depressing if you’ve been paying attention. But he’s a great fit !
No today was particularly depressing. You didn't see much of it because you were watching the end of your Orange's nice win aginst Purdue.
Congrats!!!
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,512
4,707
66
Unless you are joking, c’mon you are smarter than that.

Can’t even admit today showed what I’ve been saying all along ?

Today matched my criticisms exactly. Can you at least concede that ?
 

Colbert17!

Heisman
Aug 30, 2014
17,425
18,881
113
Unless you are joking, c’mon you are smarter than that.

Can’t even admit today showed what I’ve been saying all along ?

Today matched my criticisms exactly. Can you at least concede that ?

If you're talking to me I will agree that some of your criticisms maybe valid but I'm not going to concede that's it's "always been depressing".
Now go celebrate your big win today. I say that with not the least bit of sarcasm, it was a nice victory for the Juice and just leave us to wallow in the post mortem. But I will repeat what I said in another thread. We did still win the game.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,512
4,707
66
It eliminated any chance for Temple whatsoever. No kickoff run back for a TD. No recovered onside kick.
You take the points.
Scenario 1, score and Temple needs a TD and a FG.
Scenario 2, don’t score and Temple only needs a FG.

Is obvious which scenario boosts TU’s odds.”
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,512
4,707
66
If you're talking to me I will agree that some of your criticisms maybe valid but I'm not going to concede that's it's "always been depressing".
Now go celebrate your big win today. I say that with not the least bit of sarcasm, it was a nice victory for the Juice and just leave us to wallow in the post mortem. But I will repeat what I said in another thread. We did still win the game.
Always been depressing for me at least, because I see it every game. Anti-scoring philosophy.

I always root Big10 OOC, so no I did not root Juice. Rooted PSU too, only conf team to impress today.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,512
4,707
66
Not that I recall but possibly only once or twice at most when at a game, as was the case today.

Why do you ask ?
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,512
4,707
66
Yes, possession of the football definitely isn't a relevant variable. You are pretty stupid, aren't you?
not more valuable than scoring so that Temple would have to then score twice instead of once in the same amount of time, and with no timeouts.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,512
4,707
66
I’m not emotional about this. Coming to games 40 years, each game and season isn’t that meaningful. I hope for wins but losses don’t faze me. It’s just entertainment.

Besides, I didn’t need to post during the game today. The offense showed exactly what I’d have posted anyway, loud and clear.
 
Last edited:

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,512
4,707
66
You honestly think being up 8 + possible PAT with 1:00 left and kicking the ball away is better than being up 2 in victory formation? What?
Yes in terms of probability, but in reality it wasn’t going to matter. Am not criticizing, just pointing out better strategy.
 
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Everything Rutgers Football HC Greg Schiano said following Saturday's scrimmage
  2. 02 The Knight Report Rutgers Football Fall Camp: Get 75% off The Knight Report - One Day Left
  3. 03 The Knight Report Rutgers Football HC Greg Schiano talks QB battle after first scrimmage
  4. 04 The Knight Report Pennsylvania guard Korey Francis sets Rutgers Basketball Official Visit
  5. 05 The Knight Report Three-Star QB Drew Sheridan talks Rutgers interest, sets visit