FYI...

little a

Senior
Jul 4, 2001
2,134
705
0
Minnesota lost, Oregon lost (Oregon st.), Fresno (SJSU)lost, Boise state (Air Force)lost, and Wyoming (New Mexico) lost.
"We beat some very good teams" and my favorite "Minnesota is a damn good team".
God I hope Riley turns it around. So looking back our big win of the year is against an 8-4 Minnesota team (didn't beat ANYONE) and almost beating Wisconsin.
 

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
I think the program will continue to bleed fans and ticket sales.

You still have message board posters to remind you how you should be thankful for a 9-3 season.. every. last. one. of us should 'take that' compared to last year.. and you're supposed to feel better. Welcome to the mediocrity mindset.
Yeah, 9-3 sucks!!!!! So embarrassed by this...

EDIT: Complain about the blowouts, I don't have a leg to stand on. But we won the games we were supposed to win, which we couldn't say last year. It's called progression. And we still need to progress more next year. If we don't, the seat will continue to heat up. Pretty simple.
 
Aug 18, 2016
16,625
10,902
113
What was Wisconsin's big win? Beating LSU at home a couple of weeks before they fired their coach?

If you want to play the dumb game, SMU beat Houston, who killed Louisville, who destroyed Florida St, who dominated Florida, who beat mighty LSU in Baton Rouge.

i understand the disappointment in the outcomes of a couple of games. But matchups are the key. Some teams match up well and some don't. When games are played, where games are played, injuries to key players happen, all factors.

I am disappointed as well but then I look back to August and my prediction for this team was 9-3. I had a loss to Oregon and a win over Iowa but losses to Ohio St and Wisconsin.

I know people on this board who were predicting 6 or 7 wins, now complaining about how 9 isn't good enough. Seems odd to me but what do I know.
 

GBRhuskers_rivals203711

All-Conference
Jul 15, 2016
1,609
1,753
0
This will be a fun thread to read, a circle jerk from the true fans. You know; the true fans I assume have different expectations, beginning on December 1, 2014.

Please don't disappoint guys, here's your chance to let it all out!
 
  • Like
Reactions: jeans15

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
So you did not feel embarrassed two days ago on national television? You also didn't feel embarrassed at Ohio State on national television either? Two blowouts on ABC.. hmmmmmm
Didn't get my edit posted fast enough... Absolutely it was embarrassing in those two games... But I do recognize that we had Tommy (or Ryker) at QB and an offensive line that was battered for much of the season. Spare me the "Everybody has injuries" routine... Most other teams had more depth to cover the injuries sustained...

We should have been better in those games, but we weren't. We did win the games we were supposed to win, which before the season, many doubted that would happen as well. I also find it funny that the OP included a team we never played (Boise St) and failed to include the team Minnesota played (since it was top 7 wisconsin, don't want to let people know Minnesota was up in the fourth quarter before Mitch Leidner imploded).

That's pretty manipulative to make a point... Hammer Minnesota for losing to #6 Wisconsin at their house in a come from behind 4th quarter victory... Wow, what a compelling argument!!!!
 
Aug 18, 2016
16,625
10,902
113
So you did not feel embarrassed two days ago on national television? You also didn't feel embarrassed at Ohio State on national television either? Two blowouts on ABC.. hmmmmmm

Disappointed, sure. Embarrassed? Hell No. I didn't play in the games I didn't coach the players. I have no control over the outcomes of games. My emotional state isn't predicated by the outcomes of football games played by 18-23 year old young men as I sit on my fat *** drinking beer and eating Nachos.
 

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
Well it is what it is.. 9-3, blowouts on national tv again.

I'll leave you all to celebrate in peace.
Does that mean you will stop whining about everything that goes wrong while ignoring the good things? Awesome!
 

JohnRossEwing

All-American
Jul 4, 2013
11,899
5,284
0
I don't think fans are mad...they are frustrated and maybe a bit confused. All of us blamed blow out losses on Blo...so when they came back it was confusing as to where to place the blame.
 

JohnRossEwing

All-American
Jul 4, 2013
11,899
5,284
0
Thought we just got rid of the not so nice guy?
This was brought up on one of the post game call in shows...a few callers were upset that Riley sort of just stands around on the sidelines. Weird how what fans wanted has changed so quickly.
 

rrthusker

Heisman
Jul 24, 2001
135,436
63,934
113
This was brought up on one of the post game call in shows...a few callers were upset that Riley sort of just stands around on the sidelines. Weird how what fans wanted has changed so quickly.

Yep can't please em all. The coach is either too psycho or too calm.
 

tpmcg_rivals137159

All-Conference
Mar 25, 2002
10,437
1,024
0
improvement from last yr is good, but the blowouts temper the 9-3 record once again. it's all too familiar territory.

with a tougher schedule and some key position losses it could be a tough yr, again. maybe there will be compelling developments (qb? young oline making strides) to give some hope...regardless, they've got their work cut out for them.
 
Aug 18, 2016
16,625
10,902
113
Blowouts are apart of college football in this day and age.

Penn St is a top 10 team, playing for a conference title, that was blown out by 39 at Michigan

Florida St top 15 team blown out by Louisville by 43

USC top 15 team blown out by Alabama by 46

Oklahoma top 10 team lost by 21 at home to Ohio St

West Virginia top 15ish team blown out at home by 28 to Oklahoma.
 

huskerfan1414

Heisman
Oct 25, 2014
12,603
12,740
0
Yeah, 9-3 sucks!!!!! So embarrassed by this...
EDIT: Complain about the blowouts, I don't have a leg to stand on. But we won the games we were supposed to win, which we couldn't say last year. It's called progression. And we still need to progress more next year. If we don't, the seat will continue to heat up. Pretty simple.
Its not progress.
We set the nar very low in year one. Win nine games again like we have been doing and now its called progress?
If we would have won 9 and got rid of the blowouts Bo suffered id agree with you. But we havent.
This is exactly what i said would happen. After a 6 win season, as long as riley won more than six his apologists would ge yelling PROGRESS! From the rooftops. Way to set the bar low, husker fans.
Time will tell if riley wants to win badly enough to make the proper decisions and philosophy changes to do so. If he does, we can. If he doesnt, look for more sunshine pumping that ends with himleaving not having sniffed a title
Face it, so far we have a nice guy version of bo pelini, only with less wins.
 

GBRhuskers_rivals203711

All-Conference
Jul 15, 2016
1,609
1,753
0
This is exactly what i said would happen.

No it's not, here's what you actually said, the bold is my emphasis.

I can't believe anyone would say anything less than 9 wins is acceptable. This is still Nebraska and we play 12 regular season games.
My biggest fear about last year's pathetic season is that it would lower the bar, and Riley winning 7 or 8 games would be seen as meaningful progress. Looks like that's what has happened. Anything less than 9 is unacceptable.
Nine wins should be a certainty but I wouldn't be surprised to see 10 this season, especially since I think we will beat Oregon, which will be huge for momentum.

Not only that but I also find your recent comment interesting because here's what you said in August.

Question posed
Would 8-4 be good enough of an improvement for everyone? Given the road games this year I would be okay with 8-4. Here's an article that helps me think that the future is bright. Also, what are your thoughts?

huskerfan1414 said:
No, it would not be okay, especially with this schedule.

If we got a 9th win in a bowl game I would feel much better, however.

We got our 9th win in game 11. But for some reason, "9 in 13 is would make you feel much better" while you claim others are "lowering the bar". :rolleyes:
 

nu2u

All-Conference
Aug 10, 2006
10,191
2,143
113
Time will tell if riley wants to win badly enough to make the proper decisions and philosophy changes to do so
Looking forward to your bullet points which flesh that out a little. "philosophy changes" are, by their nature, more general and vague. More interested in "the proper decisions". Spill the beans coach.
 

romanman

Freshman
Apr 19, 2006
219
57
18
Yeah, 9-3 sucks!!!!! So embarrassed by this...

EDIT: Complain about the blowouts, I don't have a leg to stand on. But we won the games we were supposed to win, which we couldn't say last year. It's called progression. And we still need to progress more next year. If we don't, the seat will continue to heat up. Pretty simple.
I am sorry, but this is not progress. The only difference is that we have Mr Rogers instead of Pelini and both are/were producing the same results on the field. This chain of events was set in motion, when Dr Tom retired it has been one bad coaching hire after another. I was willing give to Riley a pass last year, because there were no epic blowouts; but this year exposed Riley and his staff at how average/bad they are in fact special team has taken a huge step back.
 

RealHusker

Senior
Jul 7, 2001
764
496
0
Blowouts are apart of college football in this day and age.

Penn St is a top 10 team, playing for a conference title, that was blown out by 39 at Michigan

Florida St top 15 team blown out by Louisville by 43

USC top 15 team blown out by Alabama by 46

Oklahoma top 10 team lost by 21 at home to Ohio St

West Virginia top 15ish team blown out at home by 28 to Oklahoma.

This actually does make me feel a little better (I'm being serious). I'm not going to bother looking it up, but I still suspect NU would have far more blow-out losses in recent years than any of the above teams.

Anyway, NU's blowouts to OSU and Iowa this year were a direct result of the health of the QB. Not that NU would have won either game, but NU would have been able to sustain a few more drives, keep the defense off the field, and likely score more points if TA doesn't get knocked out of the OSU game, and if he was actually functional against Iowa. That, of course, leads to the discussion about how the QB position at NU has been a train-wreck pretty much since Eric Crouch won the Heisman trophy.
 
Jan 24, 2004
56,018
17,342
113
No it's not, here's what you actually said, the bold is my emphasis.



Not only that but I also find your recent comment interesting because here's what you said in August.

Question posed
Would 8-4 be good enough of an improvement for everyone? Given the road games this year I would be okay with 8-4. Here's an article that helps me think that the future is bright. Also, what are your thoughts?



We got our 9th win in game 11. But for some reason, "9 in 13 is would make you feel much better" while you claim others are "lowering the bar". :rolleyes:
lol, many forget their post history is available for others to read. Caught you slipping, ha
 
Aug 27, 2006
27,799
5,563
0
I think you had to start out the season being pretty unrealistic if you're disappointed now. The signs were there from the first quarter of the first game, we weren't very good, and were it not for a schedule that ranked about....well I'm not sure where it ranked but it was pretty rank, we'd have lost long before the Wisky game. We're about where I thought we were as a program, so I'm not disappointed. Doesn't mean I like what happened a couple times this year, but if you watched us play the first couple of games, and were being honest about it, it was pretty obvious what we were. So if you ignored the signs, then I can see how you'd be disappointed, but if you were paying attention....... I'll take 9-3 with a great shot to go 10-3. I'll gladly take that this year.

I liken it to the recent election. The signs were there for over a year, but nobody was paying attention. Record new voter registrations, rally attendance, the signs were not only there, they were shouting at the top of their lungs. Just like this team and what it was all year, to many people just didn't want to believe what they were seeing with their own eyes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nebcountry
A

anon_umk0ifu6vj6zi

Guest
What makes him not so nice? Cause he fired a raving loon??
It's the easy target for mouth-breathing idiots who are easily convinced that just because Pope Tom is not running the show, everyone is bad.
That is unless Myers comes back after quitting multiple times because his feelings are so precious.
The program will never be allowed to move forward until this kind of mindset dies off.
 

huskerfan1414

Heisman
Oct 25, 2014
12,603
12,740
0
No it's not, here's what you actually said, the bold is my emphasis.



Not only that but I also find your recent comment interesting because here's what you said in August.

Question posed
Would 8-4 be good enough of an improvement for everyone? Given the road games this year I would be okay with 8-4. Here's an article that helps me think that the future is bright. Also, what are your thoughts?



We got our 9th win in game 11. But for some reason, "9 in 13 is would make you feel much better" while you claim others are "lowering the bar". :rolleyes:
I also said that assuming oregon would be good as usual and didnt think wed have the 2nd worse loss in program history and lose by 30 to an unranked, average IOWA team.
Face it, youve got bo pelini 2.0 at this point.
It was unacceptable under pelini, but now its ok. Thats lowering the bar.
 

GBRhuskers_rivals203711

All-Conference
Jul 15, 2016
1,609
1,753
0
I also said that assuming oregon would be good as usual and didnt think wed have the 2nd worse loss in program history and lose by 30 to an unranked, average IOWA team.
Face it, youve got bo pelini 2.0 at this point.
It was unacceptable under pelini, but now its ok. Thats lowering the bar.

Double down instead of owning your expectations.

It's pretty clear what you said. No you're not only making excuses to cover what you said in August, you're trying to raise the bar.

9 wins in 11 games > 9 wins in 13 being ok
 
A

anon_umk0ifu6vj6zi

Guest
Double down instead of owning your expectations.

It's pretty clear what you said. No you're not only making excuses to cover what you said in August, you're trying to raise the bar.

9 wins in 11 games > 9 wins in 13 being ok
Hmm. Seems like he is full of crap #shocking
 

Truehuskerfan

All-Conference
May 1, 2003
15,270
3,020
0
Well, I can see the negativists who think 9-3 is something to be embarrassed about are still running their mouths. In response to the original poster, who is curiously selective about which games from yesterday to talk about, Northwestern, Indiana and Maryland all became bowl eligible yesterday. That means that 5 of our 9 wins are over bowl teams. Not too bad really. Look at Wisconsin-the team everybody praises for only losing to Ohio State and Michigan. They beat 5 bowl teams too. And who is their best win? Us. So if we're so horrible, then Wisconsin doesn't have a whole lot to be proud of either.
 
Last edited:

jlb321_rivals110621

All-American
Aug 8, 2014
7,956
5,492
0
I am not embarrassed by the 9-3 record.

what is embarrassing are fans coming on here within 24 hours of getting beat down by an unranked Iowa team (a team and coach many consider us superior to) celebrating the fact that we haven't turned the ball over the last three games (something the 95 team didn;t even accomplish !!!) and other such nonsense.

people will be satisfied with 9-3 ... but they shouldn't be looking for warm fuzzies immediately after that type of beat down by a mediocre team
 
  • Like
Reactions: nebcountry
A

anon_umk0ifu6vj6zi

Guest
Just like most of these hit and run posters you don't see until we lose. Never around any other time with anything positive. Just post and run like a little girl. Nothing to back up their mouths. Nothing. Weak
Sc sker. The clown coming up with multiple game score usernames. Little a. Snohomishred. Just the tip of the iceberg. Cockroaches
 

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
No it's not, here's what you actually said, the bold is my emphasis.



Not only that but I also find your recent comment interesting because here's what you said in August.

Question posed
Would 8-4 be good enough of an improvement for everyone? Given the road games this year I would be okay with 8-4. Here's an article that helps me think that the future is bright. Also, what are your thoughts?



We got our 9th win in game 11. But for some reason, "9 in 13 is would make you feel much better" while you claim others are "lowering the bar". :rolleyes:
Ohhhh Snap!!!!
 

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
I am not embarrassed by the 9-3 record.

what is embarrassing are fans coming on here within 24 hours of getting beat down by an unranked Iowa team (a team and coach many consider us superior to) celebrating the fact that we haven't turned the ball over the last three games (something the 95 team didn;t even accomplish !!!) and other such nonsense.

people will be satisfied with 9-3 ... but they shouldn't be looking for warm fuzzies immediately after that type of beat down by a mediocre team
This is a by-product of people telling us things are in the crapper. No one came on pointing out areas where we improved until people came on saying we are worse than before...

No one here is celebrating turnover margin or penalties... we are pointing out to the doom and gloomers that progress was made this year. Big difference between celebrating and showing why we can be pleased with this season in spite of the 2 bad losses we had.