Frank Solich Retires

leodisflowers

Senior
Feb 25, 2011
14,801
808
0
I respectfully disagree.. If it isn’t broke don’t fix it.

And Tom must have felt the same way with all that stability in the coaching staff.. Omly problem was a few where getting old and couldn’t hop on air planes to recruit around the country..

It's ok. We will never know who is right and it is good conversation, I just don't think Frank was the guy. You never know, Byrne could have hired a terrible candidate and would have probably still went down the same road. I think the biggest thing was we failed to innovate and move forward. TO was ahead of this curve a few times. Looking back Frank didn't get the athletes and we definitely got a lot less athletic and a lot slower than we were.
 

inWV

All-Conference
Sep 22, 2007
14,190
4,837
91
It's good conversation, but if any of the assistants would have taken over they would have had success. That was a well oiled machine and was stocked with talent. That staff started to age and needed some turnover as well as recruiting started to fall off as well. TO was an innovator. He was doing all kinds of things moving the program forward. Frank didn't have that gift or the gift of recruiting.
Usually teams don't follow up a HOF coach with another HOF coach, but NU did just that between 1962 and 1997. HOF coaches are not usually hanging around waiting on offers. But Stevie P fired Frank, didn't seem to have a real plan for his replacement, and eventually hired a pro coach who had just been fired by the Raiders.
 

steinek11

All-Conference
Apr 18, 2004
13,509
1,251
113
7-7 season in 2002 was the start of the downfall. The 2003 schedule looks good on paper but Penn St was 3-9, we played two teams that were ranked at the end of the season and lost to both Kansas St and Texas, plus lost to a meh Missouri team that year. Oklahoma St was the only team with a winning record that Solich beat that year.

Not all 9-3 look the same.
I remember when Mike Riley was 7 and 0. What a paper tiger fraud that was.
 

steinek11

All-Conference
Apr 18, 2004
13,509
1,251
113
It's ok. We will never know who is right and it is good conversation, I just don't think Frank was the guy. You never know, Byrne could have hired a terrible candidate and would have probably still went down the same road. I think the biggest thing was we failed to innovate and move forward. TO was ahead of this curve a few times. Looking back Frank didn't get the athletes and we definitely got a lot less athletic and a lot slower than we were.
That, and Frank was saddled with some old guys on the staff who rested on their laurels and didn't put in the work on the recruiting trail. Was going to be pretty hard for him to cut those guys loose prematurely.
 

leodisflowers

Senior
Feb 25, 2011
14,801
808
0
Usually teams don't follow up a HOF coach with another HOF coach, but NU did just that between 1962 and 1997. HOF coaches are not usually hanging around waiting on offers. But Stevie P fired Frank, didn't seem to have a real plan for his replacement, and eventually hired a pro coach who had just been fired by the Raiders.
I 100% agree with this Stevie P had nothing and that was just a huge clusterfuck. I don't necessarily think Frank should have been fired at the time, I just think we screwed up going with him out of the gate.
 
Aug 18, 2016
16,645
10,920
113
I respectfully disagree.. If it isn’t broke don’t fix it.

And Tom must have felt the same way with all that stability in the coaching staff.. Omly problem was a few where getting old and couldn’t hop on air planes to recruit around the country..
And a few didn't like Frank.
 

beaglehusker

All-Conference
Sep 29, 2006
13,178
3,891
0
hope they can get him in lincoln for a game this season, especially if his health is failing.
Get him back this year so we can finally honor him and get rid of this curse we've been under. Anybody got a live chicken
 
Aug 18, 2016
16,645
10,920
113
A coach goes 7-7, then revamps the defensive staff and the team has a record of 10-3 the next year, albeit with a kind schedule. Ranked in the top 25 after the season. I'm sure the fear was of having a true losing season, but NU did that with Callahan the next year. Frank would have been gone the next year had he gone 5-7 and missed the bowl. I suspect the fear for Stevie P was that with Pelini in the fold as D coordinator, Frank would have posted 8-9 wins as long as Bo was in the mix, thus putting NU in a kind of purgatory. I think there were 8-9 wins on the schedule in 2004 under a Solich/Pelini staff.
The fact is that we think we know what would have happened if Solich remained, but we really don't. The general operating procedure since TO left has been to not be happy with the coaching, and thinking that if we could just be rid of that coach, some magic coach was was waiting in the wings to take NU to new heights. The result is that we would all be incredibly happy if the team won the same number of games that Frank and Pelini won every year but one.
A 7-7 record is a reality that even great programs had experienced much more recently than NU. So no, that wasn't a downfall. It was a sign for a corrective, which NU made. Was Solich an inferior head coach to TO. Yes. Was it wise to fire him after a 9-3 regular season and a top 20 final ranking. No, unless you wish to signal to the applicant pool that insane expectations are expected.
There are a couple of facts that I will share. No matter how you want to sugarcoat it, 7 losses in one season is a downfall at Nebraska, especially the year after playing for a national title. The fact that of the 16 wins over the next 2 seasons, 2002 and 2003, Frank Solich coached teams beat exactly 2 teams with winning records. Both games were the first games of the year both at home.

I tend to agree with others that pointed out that Solich shouldn't have been the hire to begin with. Osborne handicapped him by stating publicly that the staff should remain intact outside of hiring Gillespie as RB coach. Sort of a it worked for me so it will work for you type thing. Except the relationships between Solich and the staff and Osborne and the staff were no where near the same. The respect level for Solich was miniscule as compared to that of Osborne.

The fact that Osborne wanted to run the show, without running the show, was an issue. There were multiple coaches on that staff that needed to retire. But Solich knew that he couldn't go against the guy that gave him the job and make changes to the staff. So one bad decision is compounded by another bad decision.

I like Osborne the coach and by all accounts is a genuinely great man. I just wish people at the university would leave him out of decision making process. We don't sell alcohol because Osborne wouldn't like it. When we needed to get rid of Petersen, lets bring Osborne in to fix it, he will know what to do. Except the only people he interviewed were 2 guys with Nebraska ties, Pelini and Gill and then Jim freaking Grobe to replace Callahan. Was Pelini a hot candidate at the time? absolutely but you can't tell me there wasn't more interest in that job than those 3 dudes.
 

bigboxes

All-American
Sep 4, 2004
46,231
6,775
113
Frank was the heir apparent HC for years before TO retired and I assume was TO's choice. What Byrne should have been able to do and what choices were actually available to him were very different.
You are right. TO botched the hire. Should have hired Mack Brown. Solich was let go at the right time. Those three losses were *** wuppings.
 

jeans1515

Redshirt
Sep 30, 2016
263
28
0
7-7 season in 2002 was the start of the downfall. The 2003 schedule looks good on paper but Penn St was 3-9, we played two teams that were ranked at the end of the season and lost to both Kansas St and Texas, plus lost to a meh Missouri team that year. Oklahoma St was the only team with a winning record that Solich beat that year.

Not all 9-3 look the same.

They a really do


No one cares your schedule is hard if you go . 3-9.

They say you sucked liked the other 3-9 teams..lol
 

inWV

All-Conference
Sep 22, 2007
14,190
4,837
91
There are a couple of facts that I will share. No matter how you want to sugarcoat it, 7 losses in one season is a downfall at Nebraska, especially the year after playing for a national title. The fact that of the 16 wins over the next 2 seasons, 2002 and 2003, Frank Solich coached teams beat exactly 2 teams with winning records. Both games were the first games of the year both at home.

I tend to agree with others that pointed out that Solich shouldn't have been the hire to begin with. Osborne handicapped him by stating publicly that the staff should remain intact outside of hiring Gillespie as RB coach. Sort of a it worked for me so it will work for you type thing. Except the relationships between Solich and the staff and Osborne and the staff were no where near the same. The respect level for Solich was miniscule as compared to that of Osborne.

The fact that Osborne wanted to run the show, without running the show, was an issue. There were multiple coaches on that staff that needed to retire. But Solich knew that he couldn't go against the guy that gave him the job and make changes to the staff. So one bad decision is compounded by another bad decision.

I like Osborne the coach and by all accounts is a genuinely great man. I just wish people at the university would leave him out of decision making process. We don't sell alcohol because Osborne wouldn't like it. When we needed to get rid of Petersen, lets bring Osborne in to fix it, he will know what to do. Except the only people he interviewed were 2 guys with Nebraska ties, Pelini and Gill and then Jim freaking Grobe to replace Callahan. Was Pelini a hot candidate at the time? absolutely but you can't tell me there wasn't more interest in that job than those 3 dudes.
The problem with a GOAT level head coach is that coach has an open lane to meddle as former HC. The dude is one of the most revered Nebraskans. But canning a coach that just won 9 games sends a message to the future applicant pool, and it doesn’t matter much the opponents quality. And whatever the nature of TOS meddling was didn’t excuse the fact that Pederson didn’t have his ducks in a row on the subsequent search.
 

Cidsports

All-American
Iowa Swarm member
Nov 8, 2001
45,051
9,847
113
His father had issues with his heart. Now Frank Solich is needing to step down, due to heart concerns. Hope your health stays strong, Frank!
 

bigboxes

All-American
Sep 4, 2004
46,231
6,775
113
I may not have loved him as head coach, but he's a true Husker. Always welcome in Lincoln. Hope he has a good retirement!
 

Redscarlet

Heisman
Jun 17, 2001
33,040
11,051
113
There are a couple of facts that I will share. No matter how you want to sugarcoat it, 7 losses in one season is a downfall at Nebraska, especially the year after playing for a national title. The fact that of the 16 wins over the next 2 seasons, 2002 and 2003, Frank Solich coached teams beat exactly 2 teams with winning records. Both games were the first games of the year both at home.

I tend to agree with others that pointed out that Solich shouldn't have been the hire to begin with. Osborne handicapped him by stating publicly that the staff should remain intact outside of hiring Gillespie as RB coach. Sort of a it worked for me so it will work for you type thing. Except the relationships between Solich and the staff and Osborne and the staff were no where near the same. The respect level for Solich was miniscule as compared to that of Osborne.

The fact that Osborne wanted to run the show, without running the show, was an issue. There were multiple coaches on that staff that needed to retire. But Solich knew that he couldn't go against the guy that gave him the job and make changes to the staff. So one bad decision is compounded by another bad decision.

I like Osborne the coach and by all accounts is a genuinely great man. I just wish people at the university would leave him out of decision making process. We don't sell alcohol because Osborne wouldn't like it. When we needed to get rid of Petersen, lets bring Osborne in to fix it, he will know what to do. Except the only people he interviewed were 2 guys with Nebraska ties, Pelini and Gill and then Jim freaking Grobe to replace Callahan. Was Pelini a hot candidate at the time? absolutely but you can't tell me there wasn't more interest in that job than those 3 dudes.
Johnson from Georgia Tech was also being considered with Grobe outside of Gill and Pelini..

Read Osborne knew the offensive side of the ball didn’t need fixing so that is why Watson was retained but the defense needs a overhaul…
 

NebChicago

Sophomore
Oct 14, 2009
3,565
141
0
I'm a proud Ohio grad. And I think it's really remarkable what Frank did with our program. Undergrads never even bothered going to games before Frank.
 

NebChicago

Sophomore
Oct 14, 2009
3,565
141
0
You are right. TO botched the hire. Should have hired Mack Brown. Solich was let go at the right time. Those three losses were *** wuppings.
We could've had a pre-Texas Mack Brown? That would've been amazing! We'd still be rolling!
 

Crazyhole

All-American
Jun 4, 2004
27,841
9,769
0
If I could invest in the Ohio Bobcats right now, I would. Albin is going to wreck the MAC.
 

NorthWillRiseAgain

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2004
8,760
4,757
113
Get him back this year so we can finally honor him and get rid of this curse we've been under. Anybody got a live chicken
 

redwine65

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2010
10,846
2,165
113
I'll always like solich....he may not have worked out at NU as head coach (talk about some shoes to fill)....but he is a solid coach
 

Husker.Wed._rivals

All-Conference
Feb 13, 2004
17,651
3,706
98
People talk about doing things "the Nebraska Way". I don't know what that means exactly, but my interpretation is being honest, humble, forthright, fair, and practicing the Golden Rule. All I know is it is obvious when something is not done "the Nebraska Way."

Holding a grudge against your boss who got the job you coveted, then quitting and holding a PC to announce your successor (who your boss had the right to name) while your boss is off on vacation is definitely not the Nebraska Way.
 

NebChicago

Sophomore
Oct 14, 2009
3,565
141
0
People talk about doing things "the Nebraska Way". I don't know what that means exactly, but my interpretation is being honest, humble, forthright, fair, and practicing the Golden Rule. All I know is it is obvious when something is not done "the Nebraska Way."

Holding a grudge against your boss who got the job you coveted, then quitting and holding a PC to announce your successor (who your boss had the right to name) while your boss is off on vacation is definitely not the Nebraska Way.
Is that true? If so is there an article link? I’d love to read about it
 

NebChicago

Sophomore
Oct 14, 2009
3,565
141
0
Is that true? If so is there an article link? I’d love to read about it
Never mind… I thought you were talking about solich passing the reigns at OHio to Albin. You are obviously talking about Osborne’s pass to Solich while Byrne was on vacation
 
Aug 21, 2010
1,148
334
0
We could've had a pre-Texas Mack Brown? That would've been amazing! We'd still be rolling!
Yes, conventional wisdom / urban legend has historically suggested that Bill Byrne wanted to hire Mack as TO's replacement and supposedly there was mutual interest.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,541
12,970
78
There are a couple of facts that I will share. No matter how you want to sugarcoat it, 7 losses in one season is a downfall at Nebraska, especially the year after playing for a national title. The fact that of the 16 wins over the next 2 seasons, 2002 and 2003, Frank Solich coached teams beat exactly 2 teams with winning records. Both games were the first games of the year both at home.

I tend to agree with others that pointed out that Solich shouldn't have been the hire to begin with. Osborne handicapped him by stating publicly that the staff should remain intact outside of hiring Gillespie as RB coach. Sort of a it worked for me so it will work for you type thing. Except the relationships between Solich and the staff and Osborne and the staff were no where near the same. The respect level for Solich was miniscule as compared to that of Osborne.

The fact that Osborne wanted to run the show, without running the show, was an issue. There were multiple coaches on that staff that needed to retire. But Solich knew that he couldn't go against the guy that gave him the job and make changes to the staff. So one bad decision is compounded by another bad decision.

I like Osborne the coach and by all accounts is a genuinely great man. I just wish people at the university would leave him out of decision making process. We don't sell alcohol because Osborne wouldn't like it. When we needed to get rid of Petersen, lets bring Osborne in to fix it, he will know what to do. Except the only people he interviewed were 2 guys with Nebraska ties, Pelini and Gill and then Jim freaking Grobe to replace Callahan. Was Pelini a hot candidate at the time? absolutely but you can't tell me there wasn't more interest in that job than those 3 dudes.
The only thing I would disagree with is the idea of completely leaving Tom out of the decision making process. His endorsement or lack thereof can largely determine how a coaching move is viewed by a large percentage of the fan base and potentially the future success of that coach. I have no problem with them doing their search and after they've got it pretty well narrowed down going to Tom and telling him "this is what we're thinking and why". Listen to what he has to say and then do what you're going to do.