Let's see...2 or 3 elite players surrounded by some pretty good ones. Sounds like what Wisconsin put on the floor the past couple years.
Wait a minute though. Bo Ryan is 0-2 in the Final Four. That's no good. Of course we won't know how bad he is until 4 more trips.
How about Michigan St.? They follow this formula very well.
Oh no, that can't be right. Izzo is even WORSE in the Final Four than Cal.
Kansas always seems to have a couple of studs mixed in with upperclassmen. But the funny thing is, they've only been to one FF since Cal got to Lexington. Good thing they didn't get to 4 or 5...they could have had more losses!!!
How's about perennial blueblood UNC? They only had one guy drafted this year, but they usually have a couple. And lots of their players hang around to provide that upperclassmen leadership.
But there's something wrong here too. Ol Roy hasn't sniffed the Final Four since 2009. At least he knows how to close the deal when he gets there.
I guess it all boils down to Duke and UCONN. They have each won 2 titles since Cal got here, which proves that Cal's system doesn't work. I knew there was proof in there somewhere.
I would say UL, since they won the other title these last 6 years with their senior laden team. But I can't quite figure how Cal has managed to beat them 7 out of 8, including twice under those bright NCAA lights. Anomalies, very likely.
His point of view is a bit different. It is obvious he doesn't like Cal.
First Cal has not performed good enough as he references Cal's failure to win titles.
Secondly he would rather have a team as you have described over our team the last six years of which he would fair far worse than the standard he set for Cal.
Many times the more these complainers talk, they will work themselves into a corner, and show their true colors running out of reasonable responses.
Now I do not believe he is a troll by any means. He just doesn't like Cal.
Doesn't like the words Cal says.
Doesn't like Cal's goals.
Doesn't like the make-up of Cal's rosters.
Is not satisfied with Cal's performance.
I don't get it. However, he does have other good takes on things not related to Cal.